scholarly journals Preoperative oral antibiotic bowel preparation in elective resectional colorectal surgery reduces rates of surgical site infections: a single-centre experience with a cost-effectiveness analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Vadhwana ◽  
A Pouzi ◽  
G Surjus Kaneta ◽  
V Reid ◽  
D Claxton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Bowel Preparation ◽  
Mechanical Bowel Preparation ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Oral Antibiotic ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis

Introduction Surgical site infections cause considerable postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the effect on surgical site infection rates following introduction of a departmental oral antibiotic bowel preparation protocol. Methods A prospective single-centre study was performed for elective colorectal resections between May 2016-April 2018; with a control group with mechanical bowel preparation and treatment group with oral antibiotic bowel preparation (neomycin and metronidazole) and mechanical bowel preparation. The primary outcome of surgical site infection and secondary outcomes of anastomotic leak, length of stay and mortality rate were analysed using Fisher’s exact test and independent samples t-tests. A cost-effectiveness analysis was also performed. Results A total of 311 patients were included; 156 in the mechanical bowel preparation group and 155 in the mechanical bowel preparation plus oral antibiotic bowel preparation group. The study included 180 (57.9%) men and 131 (42.1%) women with a mean age of 68 years. There was a significant reduction in surgical site infection rates (mechanical bowel preparation 16.0% vs mechanical bowel preparation plus oral antibiotic bowel preparation 4.5%; P = 0.001) and mean length of stay (mechanical bowel preparation 10.2 days vs mechanical bowel preparation plus oral antibiotic bowel preparation 8.2 days; P = 0.012). There was also a reduction in anastomotic leak and mortality rates. Subgroup analyses demonstrated significantly reduced surgical site infection rates in laparoscopic resections (P = 0.008). There was an estimated cost saving of £239.13 per patient and £37,065 for our institution over a one-year period. Conclusion Oral antibiotic bowel preparation is a feasible and cost-effective intervention shown to significantly reduce the rates of surgical site infection and length of stay in elective colorectal surgery.

Enhancing recovery: Joining the Improving Surgical Care and Recovery programme to decrease colorectal surgical site infections

2021 ◽  
pp. 175045892096202
Author(s):  
Bernadette Boalt-Watson ◽  
Cherif Boutros
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Mechanical Bowel Preparation ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Surgical Site Infection Rate

Aim Surgical site infections after colorectal surgery are a clinical and financial challenge in healthcare. The purpose of this project was to decrease the rate of surgical site infections in colorectal surgical patients in a community hospital with an academic cancer centre in the United States of America. Method The Quality Improvement Department obtained data to measure the hospital’s performance with colorectal surgical patients. The data examined the surgical site infection rate and the length of stay. A multidisciplinary team was established to implement protocols to improve compliance. Results More than 200 patients received a colorectal surgical resection at the hospital. The implemented protocols decreased both the surgical site infection rate and the length of stay (9.1–0% and median 6–4 days respectively). Discussion Challenges with implementation of the Improving Surgical Care and Recovery programme, in a community setting, are discussed. The challenges were worked through collaboratively to achieve the best outcomes for the patients. Conclusion The interdisciplinary committee used evidence-based practices to enhance the care of the colorectal patients. Some of the protocols that emerged were: patient education, pain medication, mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics, as well as early alimentation. The protocols are discussed in Tables 1 to 4.

scholarly journals The Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Elective Colon Surgery

Scientifica ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald E. Fry
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Bowel Preparation ◽  
Mechanical Bowel Preparation ◽  
Local Environment ◽  
Colon Surgery ◽  
Colon Resection ◽  
Oral Antibiotic ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Elective Colon Surgery ◽  
Elective Colon

Infections at the surgical site continue to occur in as many as 20% of elective colon resection cases. Methods to reduce these infections are inconsistently applied. Surgical site infection (SSI) is the result of multiple interactive variables including the inoculum of bacteria that contaminate the site, the virulence of the contaminating microbes, and the local environment at the surgical site. These variables that promote infection are potentially offset by the effectiveness of the host defense. Reduction in the inoculum of bacteria is achieved by appropriate surgical site preparation, systemic preventive antibiotics, and use of mechanical bowel preparation in conjunction with the oral antibiotic bowel preparation. Intraoperative reduction of hematoma, necrotic tissue, foreign bodies, and tissue dead space will reduce infections. Enhancement of the host may be achieved by perioperative supplemental oxygenation, maintenance of normothermia, and glycemic control. These methods require additional research to identify optimum application. Uniform application of currently understood methods and continued research into new methods to reduce microbial contamination and enhancement of host responsiveness can lead to better outcomes.

58 Use of Abdominal Wall or Sucutaneous Drain to Reduce the Risk of Surgical Site Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Mistry ◽  
B Woolner ◽  
A John
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Standard Operating Procedure ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Local Evidence ◽  
Audit Data ◽  
The Impact ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Introduction Open abdominal surgery confers potentially greater risk of surgical site infections, and local evidence suggests use of drains can reduce this. Our objectives were: Assessing local rates and risk factors of infections and if use of drains can reduce the rates of infections. Method Retrospectively looking from 01/01/2018 to 31/12/2018, at patients following laparotomy or open cholecystectomy. Data collection on demographics, smoking/alcohol status, heart, respiratory or renal disease or diabetes, steroid use and CEPOD status, as well as use of drain and the outcome of infection using inpatient and online patient records. Results 84 patients included, 25 had drains inserted. There were 13 documented cases of surgical site infection, all of whom had no drain post-op. Other parameters shown to be most prevalent in the patients with a surgical site infection include being current/ex-smoker (8/13), having heart disease (9/13), and elective procedures. Conclusions Aiming to reduce the risk of surgical site infections can improve morbidity and potentially mortality outcomes. Our audit data showed that there appears to be a benefit of inserting intra-abdominal or subcutaneous drains. We will create a standard operating procedure of all patient to receive drains post-op and then re-audit to assess the impact this has on infection rates.

Reduction in Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Expenditure and the Rate of Surgical Site Infection by Means of a Protocol That Controls the Use of Prophylaxis

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1358-1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa I. Gómez ◽  
Silvia I. Acosta-Gnass ◽  
Luisa Mosqueda-Barboza ◽  
Juan A Basualdo
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Final Stage ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Prospective Survey ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Objective.To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on training and the use of a protocol with an automatic stop of antimicrobial prophylaxis to improve hospital compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.Design.An interventional study with a before-after trial was conducted in 3 stages: a 3-year initial stage (January 1999 to December 2001), during which a descriptive-prospective survey was performed to evaluate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections; a 6-month second stage (January to June 2002), during which an educational intervention was performed regarding the routine use of a surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis request form that included an automatic stop of prophylaxis (the “automatic-stop prophylaxis form”); and a 3-year final stage (July 2002 to June 2005), during which a descriptive-prospective survey of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections was again performed.Setting.An 88-bed teaching hospital in Entre Ríos, Argentina.Patients.A total of 3,496 patients who underwent surgery were included in the first stage of the study and 3,982 were included in the final stage.Results.Comparison of the first stage of the study with the final stage revealed that antimicrobial prophylaxis was given at the appropriate time to 55% and 88% of patients, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.25-0.30]; P < .01); the antimicrobial regimen was adequate in 74% and 87% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45-0.55]; P < .01); duration of the prophylaxis was adequate in 44% and 55% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.77-0.84]; P < .01); and the surgical site infection rates were 3.2% and 1.9%, respectively (RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79]; P < .01). Antimicrobial expenditure was US$10,678.66 per 1,000 patient-days during the first stage and US$7,686.05 per 1,000 patient-days during the final stage (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.86-0.89]; P<.01).Conclusion.The intervention based on training and application of a protocol with an automatic stop of prophylaxis favored compliance with the hospital's current surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines before the intervention, achieving significant reductions of surgical site infection rates and substantial savings for the healthcare system.

scholarly journals Getting It Right First Time: the national survey of surgical site infection rates in NHS trusts in England

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 463-471
Author(s):  
JLC Wong ◽  
CWY Ho ◽  
G Scott ◽  
JT Machin ◽  
TWR Briggs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Paediatric Surgery ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Infection Surveillance ◽  
Surgical Units ◽  
First Time

Introduction Surgical site infections are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients. The Getting It Right First Time surgical site infection programme set up a national survey to review surgical site infection rates in surgical units in England. The objectives were for frontline clinicians to assess the rates of infection following selected procedures, to examine the risk of significant complications and to review current practice in the prevention of surgical site infection. Methods A national survey was launched in April 2017 to assess surgical site infections within 13 specialties: breast surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, cranial neurosurgery, ear, nose and throat surgery, general surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology, ophthalmology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthopaedic surgery, paediatric surgery, spinal surgery, urology and vascular surgery. All participating trusts prospectively identified and collected supporting information on surgical site infections diagnosed within the six-month study period. Results Data were received from 95 NHS trusts. A total of 1807 surgical site infection cases were reported. There were variations in rates reported by trusts across specialties and procedures. Reoperations were reported in 36.2% of all identified cases, and surgical site infections are associated with a delayed discharge rate of 34.1% in our survey. Conclusion The Getting It Right First Time surgical site infection programme has introduced a different approach to infection surveillance in England. Results of the survey has demonstrated variation in surgical site infection rates among surgical units, raised the importance in addressing these issues for better patient outcomes and to reduce the financial burden on the NHS. Much work remains to be done to improve surgical site infection surveillance across surgical units and trusts in England.

scholarly journals MRSA – ‘Bug-Bear’ of a Surgical Practice: Reducing the Incidence of MRSA Surgical Site Infections

2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Guyot ◽  
Graham Layer
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Surgical Practice ◽  
Department Of Health

Adverse publicity (the ‘superbug') has demonstrated that the problem of MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) is prevalent in many of the country's most prestigious hospitals. The results of the mandatory UK Department of Health (DH) surveillance for early surgical site infections in orthopaedic surgery (SSIS) have been published recently for the period April 2004 to March 2005 when 41,242 operations were studied (< http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistic > 28 October 2005). Infection rates were generally and gratifyingly low but 48% of surgical site infections were caused by Staph. aureus and of those 68% were MRSA. The following article will discuss the aetiology and prevention of MRSA surgical site infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document