Toxic adenoma: to biopsy or not to biopsy?

Author(s):  
MS Goonoo ◽  
MF Arshad ◽  
F Tahir ◽  
SP Balasubramanian

Toxic adenoma nodules rarely harbour cancer. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is often not done because of the rarity of these lesions being cancer, the difficulty in interpreting cytology in hyperthyroid patients and the rare precipitation of thyrotoxicosis. We present two young, Caucasian female patients aged 29 and 13 years who were each diagnosed with a toxic nodule categorised as benign and indeterminate respectively. They underwent hemithyroidectomy after being rendered euthyroid, however their histology unexpectedly revealed differentiated follicular cancer. Despite thyroid cancer being rare in patients with toxic adenomas, it should be considered when planning treatment, especially if there are risk factors for cancer, or suspicious features on ultrasound examination. A review of the literature shows that compared with adenomas in euthyroid patients, patients in this group are generally younger and predominately female. If an FNA is considered, it should be performed after the patient is rendered euthyroid.

2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (7) ◽  
pp. 643-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
David D Pothier ◽  
AA Narula

INTRODUCTION Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a well-established investigation in thyroid disease. Fine needle sampling without aspiration (FNS) is less commonly used but often easier to perform. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages but, as yet, there is no agreement on which method produces better specimens for cytological diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS We undertook a review of the literature and performed a meta-analysis of the results of four crossover trials. RESULTS The resulting odds ratio favoured FNS (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.88–1.11) but was not statistically significant. A fifth paper not included in the meta-analysis reported results in favour of FNS (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence from the meta-analysis that one method is superior to the other; however, taking into consideration all available evidence, it seems that FNS may be easier to perform and may produce better samples.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
YaNan Zhang ◽  
Ying Chang ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Xiaolin Xu ◽  
Xu Zhang

Abstract Purpose: To describe the clinical and histopathological characteristics of diffuse infiltrating retinoblastoma underwent primary enucleation from Chinese children. Methods: It was a hospital-based retrospective study that included all eyes with retinoblastomas consecutively enucleated in the Beijing Tongren Hospital between October 2005 and October 2019. Further studies were carried out in patients diagnosed by clinicians and pathologists as diffuse infiltrating retinoblastoma. Results: Out of 1,911 patients, 37 eyes of 37 patients (2%) were classified as diffuse infiltrating type and treated with primary enucleation. The tumors were detected at a mean age of 47 months (range: 6–108 months). There were two (5%) patients with binocular tumors and one (3%) patient with a positive family history. Anterior chamber fine needle aspiration biopsy was obtained in 5 cases for diagnostic purpose. In 11 patients (30%), the retinoblastoma had not initially been diagnosed as a tumor. The most common symptoms found on ophthalmic examination were conjunctiva injection (n=17;46%) of anterior segment and vitreous seeds (n=23; 62%) of posterior segment. 12 of 37 tumors measured by imaging examination and cross-section showed the average height was 7mm and average width was 10mm. The minimum tumor diameter was just 3mm. Histopathology revealed tumor invasion into optic nerve (n=26; 70%), iris (n=14; 38%), ciliary body (n=12; 32%), massive choroid (n=2;5%) and iris neovascularization (n=24; 65%). Histopathologic risk factors (HRF) were detected in 26 eyes. Anterior chamber fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), cornea endothelium with tumor seeds, anterior chamber free-floating tumor seeds, or pseudohypopyon might contribute to a higher rate of histopathological risk factors. Conclusions: Diffuse infiltrating retinoblastoma was usually masqueraded as endophthalmitis. Therefore, it should always be considered as a differential diagnosis in intraocular inflammation. Considering the so small diameter of the tumor, it should be examined carefully. Anterior chamber fine needle aspiration biopsy should be used with caution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document