scholarly journals Producing 3D printed hand models for anatomy education using cadaveric dissection: a feasibility study

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 217-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
SR Dhumale ◽  
TW Barraclough ◽  
A Stokes ◽  
W Lam

What are the potential benefits and problems?

Morphologie ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.A. Onigbinde ◽  
T. Chia ◽  
O.I. Oyeniran ◽  
A.O. Ajagbe

2021 ◽  
pp. 026835552098822
Author(s):  
Philip Stather ◽  
Carroll Petty ◽  
Helen Langthorne ◽  
Emma Rayner ◽  
Jufen Zhang ◽  
...  

Introduction The mainstay of treatment for venous ulceration remains compression therapy. Velcro Wrap devices are being increasingly used in these patients despite limited evidence. This feasibility study aimed to compare standard bandaging to the JuxtaCures™ Velcro wrap device. Methods A single centre, unblinded RCT compared participants with venous ulceration randomised to either the JuxtaCures™ device or short stretch bandaging. Participants were followed up for 26 weeks. Results 160 participants were screened with 40 randomised. 3 participants in bandaging and 1 in JuxtaCures™ didn’t complete the study. 60% in JuxtaCures™ healed v 55% in bandaging despite larger ulcers in the JuxtaCures™ arm (9.33 cm2 v 6.97 cm2). There was no significant difference in time to healing (12.17 v 13.64 weeks). JuxtaCures™ showed improved ulcer reduction for those that didn’t heal (14.91–5.00 cm2 v 14.20–8.62 cm2; P = 0.06). JuxtaCures™ had more consistent sub-bandage pressure dropping from 39–36 mmHg versus 41–25 mmHg in bandaging between application and removal (P < 0.001). Quality of life (EQ5D) was improved in JuxtaCures at 3 months (mean difference 0.14, p = 0.04), but not at 1 and 6 months, or in disease specific quality of life. Cost was lower in JuxtaCures™ £842.47 v £1064.68. Duration of appointment was significantly shorter in JuxtaCures™ (41 minutes v 53 minutes; P = 0.003). Conclusion This study has shown the feasibility and necessity of running a multicentre trial to evaluate the use of Velcro wrap devices for venous ulceration. It highlights the potential benefits of more consistent pressure, increased self-care, and potential with regards to ulcer healing, cost, nursing resource and quality of life.


2018 ◽  
Vol 265 ◽  
pp. 690-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Cohen ◽  
S. Menkin ◽  
M. Lifshits ◽  
Y. Kamir ◽  
A. Gladkich ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique Garas ◽  
Mauro Vaccarezza ◽  
George Newland ◽  
Kylie McVay-Doornbusch ◽  
Jamila Hasani

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 5628
Author(s):  
Zhanzhao Li ◽  
Maryam Hojati ◽  
Zhengyu Wu ◽  
Jonathon Piasente ◽  
Negar Ashrafi ◽  
...  

3D-printing of cementitious materials is an innovative construction approach with which building elements can be constructed without the use of formwork. Despite potential benefits in the construction industry, it introduces various engineering challenges from the material point of view. This paper reviews the properties of extrusion-based 3D-printed cementitious materials in both fresh and hardened states. Four main properties of fresh-state printing materials are addressed: flowability, extrudability, buildability, and open time, along with hardened properties, including density, compressive strength, flexural strength, tensile bond strength, shrinkage, and cracking. Experimental testing and effective factors of each property are covered, and a mix design procedure is proposed. The main objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the recent development in 3D-printing of cementitious materials and to identify the research gaps that need further investigation.


Author(s):  
Tae Hoon Kim ◽  
Sangmin Lee ◽  
Dong Geon Kim ◽  
Jae Young Jeong ◽  
Hye Jeong Yang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document