cementitious materials
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

3154
(FIVE YEARS 1310)

H-INDEX

73
(FIVE YEARS 15)

2022 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. 106709
Author(s):  
Saif Al-Shmaisani ◽  
Ryan D. Kalina ◽  
Raissa Douglas Ferron ◽  
Maria C.G. Juenger

2022 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 100040
Author(s):  
Afonso R. G. de Azevedo ◽  
Mohamed Amin ◽  
Marijana Hadzima-Nyarko ◽  
Ibrahim Saad Agwa ◽  
Abdullah M. Zeyad ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. 106698
Author(s):  
Abdelrahman Hamdan ◽  
Taehwan Kim ◽  
Ailar Hajimohammadi ◽  
Mohammed Fouad Alnahhal ◽  
Aditya Rawal

2022 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 106676
Author(s):  
Yushan Gu ◽  
Patrick Dangla ◽  
Renaud-Pierre Martin ◽  
Othman Omikrine Metalssi ◽  
Teddy Fen-Chong

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hemn Unis Ahmed ◽  
Ahmed S. Mohammed ◽  
Azad A. Mohammed

Abstract Geopolymers are innovative cementitious materials that can completely replace traditional Portland cement composites and have a lower carbon footprint than Portland cement. Recent efforts have been made to incorporate various nanomaterials, most notably nano-silica (nS), into geopolymer concrete (GPC) to improve the composite's properties and performance. Compression strength (CS) is one of the essential properties of all types of concrete composites, including geopolymer concrete. As a result, creating a credible model for forecasting concrete CS is critical for saving time, energy, and money, as well as providing guidance for scheduling the construction process and removing formworks. This paper presents a large amount of mixed design data correlated to mechanical strength using empirical correlations and neural networks. Several models, including artificial neural network, M5P-tree, linear regression, nonlinear regression, and multilogistic regression models were utilized to create models for forecasting the CS of GPC incorporated nS. In this case, about 207 tested CS values were collected from literature studies and then analyzed to promote the models. For the first time, eleven effective variables were employed as input model parameters during the modeling process, including the alkaline solution to binder ratio, binder content, fine and coarse aggregate content, NaOH and Na2SiO3 content, Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio, molarity, nS content, curing temperatures, and ages. The developed models were assessed using different statistical tools such as RMSE, MAE, SI, OBJ value, and R2. Results revealed that the ANN model estimated the CS of GPC incorporated nS more accurately than the other models. On the other hand, the alkaline solution to binder ratio, molarity, NaOH content, curing temperature, and ages were those parameters that have significant influences on the CS of GPC incorporated nS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document