scholarly journals Applying to vascular specialty training in the UK: 12 tips for success

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
AD Jones ◽  
MA Waduud ◽  
J De Siqueira ◽  
DA Russell ◽  
D Julian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Specialty Training ◽  
The Uk

From preparation to accomplishment, maximise your chances of a career in vascular surgery.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Aadil Ahmed ◽  
Adam Heyes ◽  
Jagraj Pandher ◽  
Sriram Rajagopalan
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
European Society ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Substantial Proportion ◽  
Limb Loss ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Treatable Condition

Vascular surgery is a relatively new surgical sub-speciality in the UK, with treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms forming a substantial proportion of the emergency and elective caseload. This article summarises the guidance from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence and the European Society for Vascular Surgery that outlines the epidemiology, diagnosis and management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. This is important for both vascular and non-vascular trainees to understand because of the critical nature of the disease, which can cause catastrophic haemorrhage, limb loss and mortality. However, if discovered in time, abdominal aortic aneurysms are a very treatable condition.

scholarly journals Are there differences between those doctors who apply for a training post in Foundation Year 2 and those who take time out of the training pathway? A UK multicohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e032021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Cleland ◽  
Gordon Prescott ◽  
Kim Walker ◽  
Peter Johnston ◽  
Ben Kumwenda
Keyword(s):  
Medical School ◽  
Workforce Planning ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Specialty Training ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Foundation Programme ◽  
Training Post ◽  
Multivariable Regression ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Participation In Higher Education

IntroductionKnowledge about the career decisions of doctors in relation to specialty (residency) training is essential in terms of UK workforce planning. However, little is known about which doctors elect to progress directly from Foundation Year 2 (F2) into core/specialty/general practice training and those who instead opt for an alternative next career step.ObjectiveTo identify if there were any individual differences between these two groups of doctors.DesignThis was a longitudinal, cohort study of ‘home’ students who graduated from UK medical schools between 2010 and 2015 and completed the Foundation Programme (FP) between 2012 and 2017.We used the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) to access linked data from different sources, including medical school performance, specialty training applications and career preferences. Multivariable regression analyses were used to predict the odds of taking time out of training based on various sociodemographic factors.Results18 380/38 905 (47.2%) of F2 doctors applied for, and accepted, a training post offer immediately after completing F2. The most common pattern for doctors taking time out of the training pathway after FP was to have a 1-year (7155: 38.8%) or a 2-year break (2605: 14.0%) from training. The odds of not proceeding directly into core or specialty training were higher for those who were male, white, entered medical school as (high) school leavers and whose parents were educated to degree level. Doctors from areas of low participation in higher education were significantly (0.001) more likely to proceed directly into core or specialty training.ConclusionThe results show that UK doctors from higher socioeconomic groups are less likely to choose to progress directly from the FP into specialty training. The data suggest that widening access and encouraging more socioeconomic diversity in our medical students may be helpful in terms of attracting F2s into core/specialty training posts.

scholarly journals Modernising Medical Careers: a urological workforce perspective

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26
Author(s):  
GO Hellawell ◽  
SS Kommu ◽  
F Mumtaz
Keyword(s):  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Specialty Training ◽  
Medical Careers ◽  
Foundation Programme ◽  
The Future ◽  
Training Programmes ◽  
The Uk ◽  
And Training

The training of junior doctors in the UK is undergoing an evolution to ensure that those concerned are adequately trained and specialised for current and future consultant practice. The implementation of this training evolution is currently widespread at the foundation level (SHO-equivalent) and will expand to specialty training programmes as foundation programme trainees complete their training in 2007. Urology has led the change to the specialty training, with three-year trainees having entered the specialty in 2005. The emergence of urology as the lead specialty for change originated in part from a meeting in 1998 that addressed the future of urology and training, the summary of which was published later that year.

scholarly journals Neurosurgery specialty training in the UK: What you need to know to be shortlisted for an interview

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 287-290
Author(s):  
Giorgos Solomou ◽  
Suzanne Murphy ◽  
Soham Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Hugo Layard Horsfall ◽  
Midhun Mohan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Specialty Training ◽  
The Uk

scholarly journals UK nationals who received their medical degrees abroad: selection into, and subsequent performance in postgraduate training: a national data linkage study

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e023060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A Tiffin ◽  
James Orr ◽  
Lewis W Paton ◽  
Daniel T Smith ◽  
John J Norcini
Keyword(s):  
Postgraduate Training ◽  
Medical Specialty ◽  
Linkage Study ◽  
Annual Review ◽  
Educational Performance ◽  
Specialty Training ◽  
Subsequent Performance ◽  
Satisfactory Outcome ◽  
Training Programmes ◽  
The Uk

ObjectivesTo compare the likelihood of success at selection into specialty training for doctors who were UK nationals but obtained their primary medical qualification (PMQ) from outside the UK (‘UK overseas graduates’) with other graduate groups based on their nationality and where they gained their PMQ. We also compared subsequent educational performance during postgraduate training between the graduate groups.DesignObservational study linking UK medical specialty recruitment data with postgraduate educational performance (Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) ratings).SettingDoctors recruited into national programmes of postgraduate specialist training in the UK from 2012 to 2016.Participants34 755 UK-based trainee doctors recruited into national specialty training programmes with at least one subsequent ARCP outcome reported during the study period, including 1108 UK overseas graduates.Main outcome measuresOdds of being deemed appointable at specialty selection and subsequent odds of obtaining a less versus more satisfactory category of ARCP outcome.ResultsUK overseas graduates were more likely to be deemed appointable compared with non-EU medical graduates who were not UK citizens (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.42), although less so than UK (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.27) or European graduates (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.75). However, UK overseas graduates were subsequently more likely to receive a less satisfactory outcome at ARCP than other graduate groups. Adjusting for age, sex, experience and the economic disparity between country of nationality and place of qualification reduced intergroup differences.ConclusionsThe failure of recruitment patterns to mirror the ARCP data raises issues regarding consistency in selection and the deaneries’ subsequent annual reviews. Excessive weight is possibly given to interview performance at specialty recruitment. Regulators and selectors should continue to develop robust processes for selection and assessment of doctors in training. Further support could be considered for UK overseas graduates returning to practice in the UK.

scholarly journals The Vascular Surgery Workforce: A Survey of Consultant Vascular Surgeons in the UK, 2014

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.W. Harkin ◽  
J.D. Beard ◽  
C.P. Shearman ◽  
M.G. Wyatt
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
The Uk

scholarly journals The pursuit of radiology training in times of a pandemic

BJR|Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 20200039
Author(s):  
Anum Pervez ◽  
Fiona McCurdie ◽  
Daniel Poon
Keyword(s):  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Specialty Training ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Radiology Training ◽  
Technology Platforms ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Medical Disciplines ◽  
Traditional Approaches ◽  
The Impact

The Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has been the greatest challenge faced by the National Health Service (NHS) in its lifetime. The crisis has seen the disruption of many long-held institutions, most critically of which is specialty training. In this article, we discuss the impact of the pandemic on Radiology training in the UK. We explore the methods that have been used to combat these difficulties and suggest workable solutions. As technology platforms become ever more integral to our daily clinical routines, we discuss how these offer a new approach to training. We argue that, of all the medical disciplines, radiologists are best placed to design and implement technology-based training, and lead other specialties in doing so. Whilst the upheaval of traditional approaches to education is a challenge, we propose that this departure from the norm offers exciting opportunities for improvement.

scholarly journals Study protocol for COvid-19 Vascular sERvice (COVER) study: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision, practice and outcomes of vascular surgery

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth A Benson
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Service Provision ◽  
British Society ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Tier 3 ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTBackgroundThe novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a profound impact on global healthcare. Shortages in staff, operating theatre space and intensive care beds has led to a significant reduction in the provision of surgical care. Even vascular surgery, often insulated from resource scarcity due to its status as an urgent specialty, has limited capacity due to the pandemic. Furthermore, many vascular surgical patients are elderly with multiple comorbidities putting them at increased risk of COVID-19 and its complications. There is an urgent need to investigate the impact on patients presenting to vascular surgeons during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods and AnalysisThe COvid-19 Vascular sERvice (COVER) study has been designed to investigate the worldwide impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vascular surgery, at both service provision and individual patient level. COVER is running as a collaborative study through the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network (VERN) with the support of numerous national (Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland, British Society of Endovascular Therapy, British Society of Interventional Radiology, Rouleaux Club) and an evolving number of international organisations (Vascupedia, SingVasc, Audible Bleeding (USA), Australian and New Zealand Vascular Trials Network (ANZVTN)). The study has 3 ‘Tiers’: Tier 1 is a survey of vascular surgeons to capture longitudinal changes to the provision of vascular services within their hospital; Tier 2 captures data on vascular and endovascular procedures performed during the pandemic; and Tier 3 will capture any deviations to patient management strategies from prepandemic best practice. Data submission and collection will be electronic using online survey tools (Tier 1: SurveyMonkey® for service provision data) and encrypted data capture forms (Tiers 2 and 3: REDCap® for patient level data). Tier 1 data will undergo real-time serial analysis to determine longitudinal changes in practice, with country-specific analyses also performed. The analysis of Tier 2 and Tier 3 data will occur on completion of the study as per the prespecified statistical analysis plan.Ethical ApprovalEthical approval from the UK Health Research Authority has been obtained for Tiers 2 and 3 (20/NW/0196 Liverpool Central). Participating centres in the UK will be required to seek local research and development approval. Non-UK centres will need to obtain a research ethics committee or institutional review board approvals in accordance with national and/or local requirements.ISRCTN: 80453162 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN80453162)Ethical Approval: 20/NW/0196 Liverpool Central, IRAS: 282224

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document