Low-Energy Proton Implantation of Stainless Steel

1976 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Wilson ◽  
G. J. Thomas ◽  
W. Bauer
2001 ◽  
Vol 308-310 ◽  
pp. 668-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-F. Barthe ◽  
D.T. Britton ◽  
C. Corbel ◽  
A. Hempel ◽  
L. Henry ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 403 ◽  
pp. 126364
Author(s):  
You Wu ◽  
Dandan Ju ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Huiyang Zhao ◽  
Chengyue Sun ◽  
...  

Solar Energy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. 486-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhaskar Parida ◽  
Gyoungho Lim ◽  
Jaeho Choi ◽  
Srikanta Palei ◽  
Keunjoo Kim

2001 ◽  
Vol 78 (9) ◽  
pp. 1234-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. T. Britton ◽  
M.-F. Barthe ◽  
C. Corbel ◽  
A. Hempel ◽  
L. Henry ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2A) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Soares Zahn ◽  
Regina Beck Ticianelli ◽  
Mitiko Saiki ◽  
Frederico Antonio Genezini

In IPEN’s Neutron Activation Laboratory (LAN/IPEN), thin stainless steel sample holders are used for gamma spectrometry in NAA measurements. This material is very practical, but its chemical composition may be troublesome, as it presents large amounts of elements with intermediate atomic number, with attenuation factors for low-energy gamma-rays that must not be neglected. In this study, count rates obtained using different sample holders were compared. To accomplish that, an Am-241 source, with 59-keV gamma emission, was used so that low-energy gamma attenuation differences can be determined. Moreover, in order to study the energy dependence of these differences, a Ho-166m source was also used. From these results, it was possible to analyze the experimental error associated to the variations between sample holders, with the aim of introducing an addictive term to the uncertainty analysis of comparative Neutron Activation Analysis results.


1979 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Mattox ◽  
D. J. Sharp

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document