Interpreting the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Subscales based on an interpersonal theory model

1999 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Riding ◽  
Alan Cartwright
2003 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle J. McDonald ◽  
Paul D. Linden

Attempting to bridge the gap between psychotherapy research on interpersonal discord and personality research on factors of normal and abnormal personality, the present study uses personality factors to predict interpersonal problems. Eysenck's P-E-N (Psychoticism-Extraversion-Neuroticism) model of personality and its correspondent index, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised is used as a schema from which to conceptualize and measure personality. Horowitz's Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, which includes six problems commonly reported by psychotherapy patients at intake (hard to be assertive, hard to be submissive, hard to be intimate, hard to be sociable, too controlling, and too responsible), was used as an index of interpersonal distress. Hierarchical multiple regression, in which the most significant predictor was entered into the equation first, indicate significant prediction of various problems by the personality factors considered here. Results are discussed in the context of interpersonal theory.


1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Maling ◽  
Michael B. Gurtman ◽  
Kenneth I. Howard

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Faustino ◽  
António Branco Vasco

Abstract The identification of dysfunctional patterns in individuals’ interpersonal interactions is a cornerstone of psychotherapy. The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-32) is one of the most used measures to explore individuals’ interpersonal styles. However, an IIP-32 Portuguese version is missing. Therefore, this study describes a preliminary psychometric study of an IIP-32 Portuguese version in a nonclinical sample. In a cross-sectional correlational design, 250 participants (M age = 20.67, SD = 4.88, males = 33, females = 217) were assessed with self-report questionnaires. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), convergent, and divergent validities of the IIP-32 were tested with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Relationships with symptomatology were also tested with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-53). The EFA showed a theoretically coherent eight-factor structure. Almost all of the IIP-32 subscales were positively correlated with personal discomfort and with BSI-53 subscales. Vindictive/self-centred, socially inhibited, domineering/controlling and self-sacrificing subscales predicted symptomatology. Promising preliminary psychometric properties were found that may support the IIP-32 as a reliable instrument to assess interpersonal styles. However, more research is required to deepen the analysis of the IIP-32 in the Portuguese population.


Author(s):  
Lucas de Francisco Carvalho ◽  
Nelson Hauck Filho ◽  
André Pereira Gonçalves ◽  
Giselle Pianowski ◽  
Lia Rocha

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
AMBER L. BUSH ◽  
AMEE B. PATEL ◽  
JON G. ALLEN ◽  
CAYLA TEAL ◽  
DAVID M. LATINI ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila Z. Wu ◽  
Michael J. Roche ◽  
Emily A. Dowgwillo ◽  
Shuo Wang ◽  
Aaron L. Pincus

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Lo Coco ◽  
Giuseppe Mannino ◽  
Laura Salerno ◽  
Veronica Oieni ◽  
Carla Di Fratello ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Stian Solem ◽  
Aashild T. Haaland ◽  
Kristen Hagen ◽  
Gunvor Launes ◽  
Bjarne Hansen ◽  
...  

AbstractAccording to interpersonal theory of personality, interpersonal behaviours can be causal and maintaining factors in emotional disorders. However, interpersonal styles have not yet been investigated in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). The aim of the study was to investigate interpersonal style in OCD. The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems – Circumplex was used to assess the interpersonal styles of 101 outpatients with OCD treated with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Patients with OCD had more interpersonal problems than the healthy control group. However, the OCD group presented with slightly fewer interpersonal problems than a further comparison group of psychiatric outpatients. Interpersonal style did not predict improvement in OCD symptoms. Following CBT for OCD, there were small to moderate improvements in interpersonal problems. These changes remained stable at 12-month follow-up. Although the OCD group reported reduced interpersonal problems post-treatment, the group still experienced more submissiveness compared to healthy controls. Interpersonal problems in OCD appeared to be more attributable to comorbid conditions than to OCD-specific symptoms. Although patients with OCD were found to have interpersonal styles that might cause some problems, these were minimal at baseline and did not significantly affect OCD treatment outcomes. Interpersonal problems in this population might be more strongly related to depressive symptoms than to OCD-specific symptoms. CBT was associated with slight improvements in interpersonal problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document