scholarly journals Improved atmospheric correction algorithm for Landsat 8–OLI data in turbid waters: a case study for the Lake Taihu, China

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (20) ◽  
pp. A1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dian Wang ◽  
Ma Ronghua ◽  
Kun Xue ◽  
Jing Li
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dian Wang ◽  
Ronghua Ma ◽  
Kun Xue ◽  
Steven Loiselle

The OLI (Operational Land Imager) sensor on Landsat-8 has the potential to meet the requirements of remote sensing of water color. However, the optical properties of inland waters are more complex than those of oceanic waters, and inland atmospheric correction presents additional challenges. We examined the performance of atmospheric correction (AC) methods for remote sensing over three highly turbid or hypereutrophic inland waters in China: Lake Hongze, Lake Chaohu, and Lake Taihu. Four water-AC algorithms (SWIR (Short Wave Infrared), EXP (Exponential Extrapolation), DSF (Dark Spectrum Fitting), and MUMM (Management Unit Mathematics Models)) and three land-AC algorithms (FLAASH (Fast Line-of-sight Atmospheric Analysis of Spectral Hypercubes), 6SV (a version of Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum), and QUAC (Quick Atmospheric Correction)) were assessed using Landsat-8 OLI data and concurrent in situ data. The results showed that the EXP (and DSF) together with 6SV algorithms provided the best estimates of the remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) and band ratios in water-AC algorithms and land-AC algorithms, respectively. AC algorithms showed a discriminating accuracy for different water types (turbid waters, in-water algae waters, and floating bloom waters). For turbid waters, EXP gave the best Rrs in visible bands. For the in-water algae and floating bloom waters, however, all water-algorithms failed due to an inappropriate aerosol model and non-zero reflectance at 1609 nm. The results of the study show the improvements that can be achieved considering SWIR bands and using band ratios, and the need for further development of AC algorithms for complex aquatic and atmospheric conditions, typical of inland waters.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 31676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dat Dinh Ngoc ◽  
Hubert Loisel ◽  
Lucile Duforêt-Gaurier ◽  
Cedric Jamet ◽  
Vincent Vantrepotte ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1927
Author(s):  
Fuqin Li ◽  
David Jupp ◽  
Thomas Schroeder ◽  
Stephen Sagar ◽  
Joshua Sixsmith ◽  
...  

An atmospheric correction algorithm for medium-resolution satellite data over general water surfaces (open/coastal, estuarine and inland waters) has been assessed in Australian coastal waters. In situ measurements at four match-up sites were used with 21 Landsat 8 images acquired between 2014 and 2017. Three aerosol sources (AERONET, MODIS ocean aerosol and climatology) were used to test the impact of the selection of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and Ångström coefficient on the retrieved accuracy. The initial results showed that the satellite-derived water-leaving reflectance can have good agreement with the in situ measurements, provided that the sun glint is handled effectively. Although the AERONET aerosol data performed best, the contemporary satellite-derived aerosol information from MODIS or an aerosol climatology could also be as effective, and should be assessed with further in situ measurements. Two sun glint correction strategies were assessed for their ability to remove the glint bias. The most successful one used the average of two shortwave infrared (SWIR) bands to represent sun glint and subtracted it from each band. Using this sun glint correction method, the mean all-band error of the retrieved water-leaving reflectance at the Lucinda Jetty Coastal Observatory (LJCO) in north east Australia was close to 4% and unbiased over 14 acquisitions. A persistent bias in the other strategy was likely due to the sky radiance being non-uniform for the selected images. In regard to future options for an operational sun glint correction, the simple method may be sufficient for clear skies until a physically based method has been established.


Author(s):  
Andrey Karpachevskiy ◽  
Sergey Lednev ◽  
Ivan Semenkov ◽  
Anna Sharapova ◽  
Sultan Nagiyev ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 106287
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiao Zhu ◽  
Cheng Wang ◽  
Sheng Nie ◽  
Feifei Pan ◽  
Xiaohuan Xi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document