Investigation of Sample Atomization Using a Power-Modulated Radio-Frequency Glow Discharge Source

1996 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Parker ◽  
R. Kenneth Marcus

A power-modulated (pulsed), radio-frequency glow discharge source by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (rf-GD-AAS) atomizer was used to evaluate the roles of applied power, pressure, orifice diameter, duty cycle, and power-on time in the production of gas-phase sample atoms. As expected, the response of the modulated rf-GD-AAS source generally followed the same trends as those exhibited by the more common continuous-powering scheme. The effects of discharge power and pressure on the observed plasma emission and absorbance transients are presented. Use of small duty cycles and higher instantaneous powers, thus keeping the same overall average power as in the continuous mode, was shown to increase the production of ground-state atoms. However, using very high instantaneous powers may more efficiently populate excited states of the atomic species, thus decreasing the observed absorption signal for resonant transitions. Individual pulse transients were shown to be distorted if the plasma “on” times approached periods down to 2 ms. Plasma stabilization times for measurements taken in the “dark” portion of the pulse cycle (i.e., after pulse termination) were comparable to those obtained in the continuous mode (on the order of a few seconds) with the use of the same source and sample. Calibration curves were used to investigate the analytical utility of different temporal regions of the absorption transients with comparisons made between the plasma “on” and “off” portions of the cycle in the quantification of continuous plasma operation.

1994 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Parker ◽  
R. Kenneth Marcus

Studies are performed to evaluate the roles of discharge power and pressure as well as limiting orifice diameter on the production of free, gas-phase atoms with a radio-frequency glow discharge-atomic absorption spectrophotometry (rf-GD-AAS) atomizer. Results indicate that nominal pressures of ∼4 Torr Ar are optimal for conductive samples, whereas a pressure of ∼1 Torr is desired for nonconductive sample types. As might be expected, absorbance signals increase with increases in discharge power to a level of ∼30 W, though trade-offs between ablation rates and source stability exist at higher levels. Completely opposite to the bulk atomization characteristics, large limiting orifice diameters yield higher absorbances. Plasma stabilization times are seen to be on the order of 20 s after initiation of the plasma for conductive and nonconductive sample types. Despite limitations imposed by the current optical instrumentation, it is believed that rf powering in GD-AAS is a viable alternative to conventional dc-powered sources, with the advantage of direct analysis of nonconductive sample types.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document