ABFM'S SELF-ASSESSMENT MODULE (SAM) REVISION PROCESS

AbstractWriting on-demand, text-based analytical essays is a challenging skill to master. Novice writers, such as the sixth grade US students in this study, may lack background knowledge of how to compose an effective essay, the self-efficacy skills, and the goal setting skills that will help with completing this task in accomplished ways. This sequential mixed-method study explored the impact of guiding a predominantly Redesignated English Learner group of students in a large, urban, low-SES school district in a timed, on-demand essay into a multiple draft process paper through a self-assessment, planning and goal setting, and reflection process as they revised this process paper over a three week period. Both treatment and comparison students completed a pre-test on demand writing assessment, a pre and post self-efficacy in writing survey, and a post-test on demand writing assessment. Students in both conditions were participating in a year-long writing intervention called The Pathway to Academic Success, developed and implemented by the UC Irvine site of the National Writing Project (UCI Writing Project), during the 2017–2018 school year and received identical training from their teachers on how to revise a pre-test essay. However, only the treatment group engaged in self-assessment, planning and goal setting, and reflection during this revision process. Students in the treatment condition demonstrated improved self-efficacy in the writing sub-domain of revision (p < .05) and had statistically significant greater gains on the post-test writing assessment (r = .57; p < .001). These results suggest that engaging students in a planned revision process that includes student reflection, planning, and goal setting before revision, and reflection and self-assessment after revision, positively impacts self-efficacy and writing outcomes.

Download Full-text

Student self-assessment in dental technology

Journal of Dental Education ◽

10.1002/j.0022-0337.1973.37.9.tb00731.x ◽

1973 ◽

Vol 37 (9) ◽

pp. 19-21 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

PR Geissler

Keyword(s):

Self Assessment ◽

Dental Technology

Download Full-text

Outcomes: Promoting Reflective Practice Using Performance Indicator Questionnaires

Perspectives on Administration and Supervision ◽

10.1044/aas20.2.64 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 20 (2) ◽

pp. 64-70 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mary Pat McCarthy

Keyword(s):

Clinical Education ◽

Performance Indicator ◽

Clinical Skills ◽

Self Assessment ◽

Clinical Practicum ◽

Self Reflection ◽

Healthcare Settings ◽

Language Pathology ◽

Traditional Performance ◽

The University

This article details the process of self-reflection applied to the use of traditional performance indicator questionnaires. The study followed eight speech-language pathology graduate students enrolled in clinical practicum in the university, school, and healthcare settings over a period of two semesters. Results indicated when reflection was focused on students' own clinical skills, modifications to practice were implemented. Results further concluded self-assessment using performance indicators paired with written reflections can be a viable form of instruction in clinical education.

Download Full-text

Students Involvement in Multilingual and Multicultural Community Services

Perspectives on Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations ◽

10.1044/cds22.2.77 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 22 (2) ◽

pp. 77-89 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ying-Chiao Tsao

Keyword(s):

Service Learning ◽

Cultural Competence ◽

Linguistically Diverse ◽

Community Services ◽

Cultural Humility ◽

Self Assessment ◽

Multicultural Community ◽

Raising Awareness ◽

Hands On ◽

Teaching Learning

Promoting cultural competence in serving diverse clients has become critically important across disciplines. Yet, progress has been limited in raising awareness and sensitivity. Tervalon and Murray-Garcia (1998) believed that cultural competence can only be truly achieved through critical self-assessment, recognition of limits, and ongoing acquisition of knowledge (known as “cultural humility”). Teaching cultural humility, and the value associated with it remains a challenging task for many educators. Challenges inherent in such instruction stem from lack of resources/known strategies as well as learner and instructor readiness. Kirk (2007) further indicates that providing feedback on one's integrity could be threatening. In current study, both traditional classroom-based teaching pedagogy and hands-on community engagement were reviewed. To bridge a gap between academic teaching/learning and real world situations, the author proposed service learning as a means to teach cultural humility and empower students with confidence in serving clients from culturally/linguistically diverse backgrounds. To provide a class of 51 students with multicultural and multilingual community service experience, the author partnered with the Tzu-Chi Foundation (an international nonprofit organization). In this article, the results, strengths, and limitations of this service learning project are discussed.

Download Full-text

How to Select a Self-Assessment Instrument: What is it You Want to Know and Why?

Perspectives on Aural Rehabilitation and Its Instrumentation ◽

10.1044/arii9.1.7 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 7-9

Author(s):

Sue Ann Erdman

Keyword(s):

Assessment Instrument ◽

Self Assessment

Download Full-text

An Advocate for Self-Assessment: Barbara Weinstein

ASHA Leader ◽

10.1044/leader.ftr1.12142007.5 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 12 (14) ◽

pp. 5-29

Author(s):

Joseph Montano

Keyword(s):

Self Assessment

Download Full-text

Sixth Edition: the New Standard

Guides Newsletter ◽

10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2008.janfeb01 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

pp. 1-12

Author(s):

Christopher R. Brigham ◽

Robert D. Rondinelli ◽

Elizabeth Genovese ◽

Craig Uejo ◽

Marjorie Eskay-Auerbach

Keyword(s):

Review Process ◽

Peer Review Process ◽

World Health ◽

International Classification Of Functioning ◽

Revision Process ◽

Sixth Edition ◽

Impairment Ratings ◽

Health Organization ◽

Impairment Severity

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, was published in December 2007 and is the result of efforts to enhance the relevance of impairment ratings, improve internal consistency, promote precision, and simplify the rating process. The revision process was designed to address shortcomings and issues in previous editions and featured an open, well-defined, and tiered peer review process. The principles underlying the AMA Guides have not changed, but the sixth edition uses a modified conceptual framework based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), a comprehensive model of disablement developed by the World Health Organization. The ICF classifies domains that describe body functions and structures, activities, and participation; because an individual's functioning and disability occur in a context, the ICF includes a list of environmental factors to consider. The ICF classification uses five impairment classes that, in the sixth edition, were developed into diagnosis-based grids for each organ system. The grids use commonly accepted consensus-based criteria to classify most diagnoses into five classes of impairment severity (normal to very severe). A figure presents the structure of a typical diagnosis-based grid, which includes ranges of impairment ratings and greater clarity about choosing a discreet numerical value that reflects the impairment.

Download Full-text