scholarly journals The Cost-Effectiveness of Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Infants in Sub-Saharan Africa

PLoS ONE ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e10313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesong Conteh ◽  
Elisa Sicuri ◽  
Fatuma Manzi ◽  
Guy Hutton ◽  
Benson Obonyo ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. e18391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Ross ◽  
Nicolas Maire ◽  
Elisa Sicuri ◽  
Thomas Smith ◽  
Lesong Conteh

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 588-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Chen ◽  
Lawrence Mwenge ◽  
Shabir Lakhi ◽  
Duncan Chanda ◽  
Peter Mwaba ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mortality from cryptoccocal meningitis remains high. The ACTA trial demonstrated that, compared with 2 weeks of amphotericin B (AmB) plus flucystosine (5FC), 1 week of AmB and 5FC was associated with lower mortality and 2 weeks of oral flucanozole (FLU) plus 5FC was non-inferior. Here, we assess the cost-effectiveness of these different treatment courses. Methods Participants were randomized in a ratio of 2:1:1:1:1 to 2 weeks of oral 5FC and FLU, 1 week of AmB and FLU, 1 week of AmB and 5FC, 2 weeks of AmB and FLU, or 2 weeks of AmB and 5FC in Malawi, Zambia, Cameroon, and Tanzania. Data on individual resource use and health outcomes were collected. Cost-effectiveness was measured as incremental costs per life-year saved, and non-parametric bootstrapping was done. Results Total costs per patient were US $1442 for 2 weeks of oral FLU and 5FC, $1763 for 1 week of AmB and FLU, $1861 for 1 week of AmB and 5FC, $2125 for 2 weeks of AmB and FLU, and $2285 for 2 weeks of AmB and 5FC. Compared to 2 weeks of AmB and 5FC, 1 week of AmB and 5FC was less costly and more effective and 2 weeks of oral FLU and 5FC was less costly and as effective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for 1 week of AmB and 5FC versus oral FLU and 5FC was US $208 (95% confidence interval $91–1210) per life-year saved. Clinical Trials Registration ISRCTN45035509. Conclusions Both 1 week of AmB and 5FC and 2 weeks of Oral FLU and 5FC are cost-effective treatments.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoenabo Douamba ◽  
Cyrille Bisseye ◽  
Florencia W. Djigma ◽  
Tegwinde R. Compaoré ◽  
Valérie Jean Telesphore Bazie ◽  
...  

Sub-Saharan Africa records each year about thirty-two million pregnant women living in areas of high transmission ofPlasmodium falciparumcausing malaria. The aim of this study was to carve out the prevalence of asymptomatic malaria among pregnant women and to emphasize its influence on haematological markers. The prevalence ofPlasmodium falciparumasymptomatic infection among pregnant women was 30% and 24% with rapid detection test (RDT) and microscopy, respectively. The prevalence ofP. falciparumasymptomatic malaria was reduced among pregnant women using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine's intermittent preventive treatment and 61% of them were anaemic. Anaemia was significantly more common in women infected withP. falciparumcompared with the uninfected pregnant women. Most of the women had normal levels of homocysteine and low levels of folate, respectively. Therefore, the systematic diagnosis of malaria should be introduced to pregnant women as a part of the antenatal care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Hill ◽  
Peter Ouma ◽  
Seth Oluoch ◽  
Jane Bruce ◽  
Simon Kariuki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is recommended for preventing malaria in pregnancy in areas of moderate-to-high transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. However, due to increasing parasite resistance to SP, research on alternative strategies is a priority. The study assessed the implementation feasibility of intermittent screening and treatment (ISTp) in the second and third trimester at antenatal care (ANC) with malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and treatment of positive cases with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) compared to IPTp-SP in western Kenya. Methods A 10-month implementation study was conducted in 12 government health facilities in four sub-counties. Six health facilities were assigned to either ISTp-DP or IPTp-SP. Evaluation comprised of facility audits, ANC observations, and exit interviews. Intermediate and cumulative effectiveness analyses were performed on all processes involved in delivery of ISTp-DP including RDT proficiency and IPTp-SP ± directly observed therapy (DOT, standard of care). Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of receiving each intervention. Results A total of 388 and 389 women were recruited in the ISTp-DP and IPTp-SP arms, respectively. For ISTp-DP, 90% (289/320) of eligible women received an RDT. Of 11% (32/289) who tested positive, 71% received the correct dose of DP and 31% the first dose by DOT, and only 6% were counselled on subsequent doses. Women making a sick visit and being tested in a facility with a resident microscopist were more likely to receive ISTp-DP (AOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.31, 2.41; and AOR 3.75, 95% CI 1.31, 2.40, respectively). For IPTp-SP, only 57% received a dose of SP by DOT. Payment for a laboratory test was independently associated with receipt of SP by DOT (AOR 6.43, 95% CI 2.07, 19.98). Conclusions The findings indicate that the systems effectiveness of ANC clinics to deliver ISTp-DP under routine conditions was poor in comparison to IPTp-SP. Several challenges to integration of ISTp with ANC were identified that may need to be considered by countries that have introduced screening at first ANC visit and, potentially, for future adoption of ISTp with more sensitive RDTs. Understanding the effectiveness of ISTp-DP will require additional research on pregnant women’s adherence to ACT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document