scholarly journals Development and Validation of a New Method to Measure Walking Speed in Free-Living Environments Using the Actibelt® Platform

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. e23080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Schimpl ◽  
Christian Lederer ◽  
Martin Daumer
2012 ◽  
Vol 67 (11) ◽  
pp. 2645-2649 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Baietto ◽  
A. D'Avolio ◽  
C. Marra ◽  
M. Simiele ◽  
J. Cusato ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (10) ◽  
pp. 2425-2430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liana T. Burghardt ◽  
Brendan Epstein ◽  
Joseph Guhlin ◽  
Matt S. Nelson ◽  
Margaret R. Taylor ◽  
...  

Assays to accurately estimate relative fitness of bacteria growing in multistrain communities can advance our understanding of how selection shapes diversity within a lineage. Here, we present a variant of the “evolve and resequence” approach both to estimate relative fitness and to identify genetic variants responsible for fitness variation of symbiotic bacteria in free-living and host environments. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by characterizing selection by two plant hosts and in two free-living environments (sterilized soil and liquid media) acting on synthetic communities of the facultatively symbiotic bacteriumEnsifer meliloti. We find (i) selection that hosts exert on rhizobial communities depends on competition among strains, (ii) selection is stronger inside hosts than in either free-living environment, and (iii) a positive host-dependent relationship between relative strain fitness in multistrain communities and host benefits provided by strains in single-strain experiments. The greatest changes in allele frequencies in response to plant hosts are in genes associated with motility, regulation of nitrogen fixation, and host/rhizobia signaling. The approach we present provides a powerful complement to experimental evolution and forward genetic screens for characterizing selection in bacterial populations, identifying gene function, and surveying the functional importance of naturally occurring genomic variation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 1643-1648 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Utzschneider ◽  
M. Goettinger ◽  
P. Weber ◽  
A. Horng ◽  
C. Glaser ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 631-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Patrik Johansson ◽  
Lena Rossander-Hulthén ◽  
Frode Slinde ◽  
Björn Ekblom

The aim of the present study was: (1) to develop a new method for total energy expenditure (TEE) assessment, using accelerometry (ACC) and heart rate (HR) telemetry in combination; (2) to validate the new method against the criterion measure (DLW) and to compare with two of the most common methods, FLEX-HR and ACC alone. In the first part of the study VO2, HR and ACC counts were measured in twenty-seven subjects during walking and running on a treadmill. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of the HR and ACC methods an analysis model was developed, using ACC at intensities of low and medium levels and HR at higher intensities. During periods of inactivity, RMR is used. A formula for determining TEE from ACC, HR and RMR was developed: TEE =1·1×(EQHR×TTHR+EQACC1×TTACC1+EQACC2×TTACC2+RMR×TTRMR). In the validation part of the study a sub-sample of eight subjects wore an accelerometer, HR was logged and TEE was measured for 14d with the DLW method. Analysis of the Bland–Altman plots with 95% CI indicates that there are no significant differences in TEE estimated with HR–ACC and ACC alone compared with TEE measured with DLW. It is concluded that the HR–ACC combination as well as ACC alone has potential as a method for assessment of TEE during free-living activities as compared with DLW


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document