scholarly journals Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review of Case Reports

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e0160221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noha Abdel-Wahab ◽  
Mohsin Shah ◽  
Maria E. Suarez-Almazor
2021 ◽  
pp. jim-2021-001806
Author(s):  
Hannah Elizabeth Green ◽  
Jorge Nieva

The advent of checkpoint blockade-based immunotherapy is rapidly changing the management of lung cancer. Whereas past anticancer drugs’ primary toxicity was hematologic, the newer agents have primarily autoimmune toxicity. Thus, it is no longer enough for oncology practitioners to be skilled only in hematology. They must also understand management of autoimmune conditions, leveraging the skills of the rheumatologist, endocrinologist and gastroenterologist in the process. Herein we describe the mechanism of action and toxicities associated with immune checkpoint blockade in patients with lung cancer and provide a framework for management of adverse events.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3084-3084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Santomasso ◽  
Aya Haggiagi ◽  
Rachna Malani ◽  
Colleen Anne Maher ◽  
Jenessa N. Holder ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 84-84
Author(s):  
Kushal Naha ◽  
Lakshmi Manogna Chintalacheruvu ◽  
Donald C. Doll ◽  
Sowjanya Naha

84 Background: Immune checkpoint blockade is known to be associated with various dermatologic adverse events. However, these adverse effects have not been studied in a systematic manner. This is especially relevant considering the rapidly increasing number of immune checkpoint inhibitors that are now available. Methods: We searched for eligible studies in PubMed and Google scholar. We reviewed randomized controlled trials involving cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors - PD1 inhibitors, PDL1 inhibitors and CTLA4 inhibitors and for dermatologic adverse effects. A total of 47 randomized controlled trials involving 11875 patients met eligibility criteria for our study. Results: Incidence rate of all grade dermatologic adverse effects was 40.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.4-41.7%). Most common adverse effects included pruritus (17.3%) (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.6-18.1%), undifferentiated rash (15.1%) (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.4-15.9%), vitiligo (3.6%) (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-3.9%), maculopapular rash (2.3%) (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-2.6%), stomatitis (0.7%) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.92%) and dry skin (0.7%) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-0.8%). Less common adverse events include palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia, pemphigoid skin reactions, lichen planus and hyperhidrosis. Grade 3 and higher adverse effects were seen in 1.3% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.6%). Conclusions: A wide range of dermatologic adverse effects can be seen with immune checkpoint blockade. While the majority of these events are of grade 1-2, they can occasionally be severe and even life threatening. Patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade should be closely monitored for dermatologic adverse effects.


iScience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 101580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weilei Hu ◽  
Guosheng Wang ◽  
Yian Wang ◽  
Matthew J. Riese ◽  
Ming You

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document