scholarly journals Active household contact screening for tuberculosis and provision of isoniazid preventive therapy to under-five children in Afghanistan

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. e0240031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Said Mirza Sayedi ◽  
Mohammad Khaled Seddiq ◽  
Mohammad K. Rashidi ◽  
Ghulam Qader ◽  
Naser Ikram ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Netsanet Fentahun ◽  
Yosef Wasihun ◽  
Abebe Mamo ◽  
Lakew Abebe Gebretsadik

Background. Children are highly susceptible to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, and about 70% of children living in the same households with pulmonary tuberculosis-positive patients will become infected. However, pulmonary positive tuberculosis is a common phenomenon and the implementation of the recommended contact screening and initiation of isoniazid preventive therapy is very low. Therefore, this study is aimed at assessing contact screening practice and initiation of isoniazid preventive therapy of under-five children among pulmonary tuberculosis-positive patients in Bahir Dar, northwest Ethiopia. Methods. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March 1 to 30, 2016. A total of 267 pulmonary tuberculosis-positive patients were included in this study. To identify independent predictors of contact screening and isoniazid preventive therapy initiation, we performed multivariable logistic regression analyses using SPSS version 20 with CI of 95% at p value < 0.05. Results. A total of 230 (90.2%) pulmonary tuberculosis-positive patients had single contacts with their under-five children. One hundred nine (64.8%) children were screened. From those screened, 11 (7.4%) developed tuberculosis disease and started antituberculosis treatment. Forty-four (31.9%) children started isoniazid preventive therapy. Sex of the participants, place of service delivery, relationship with contacts, HIV status, and attitude of PTB+ cases were significant predictors of contact screening (p<.05). Participant’s knowledge, attitude of participants, and relationship of the child with participant were significant predictors of isoniazid preventive therapy initiation (p<0.05). Conclusion. Contact screening practice and isoniazid preventive therapy initiation of children under the age of 5 in Bahir Dar zone were very low. Intimate family contact with pulmonary tuberculosis-positive patients, place of service delivery, and attitude towards screening are the key factors of contact screening. Participant’s knowledge, attitude of participants, and relationship of the child with participant are the key factors of isoniazid preventive therapy initiation. Therefore, household contact screening and isoniazid preventive therapy initiation should be paid attention to reduce transmission.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e0155525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yared Tadesse ◽  
Nigussie Gebre ◽  
Shallo Daba ◽  
Zewdu Gashu ◽  
Dereje Habte ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. e22500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhavi Pothukuchi ◽  
Sharath Burugina Nagaraja ◽  
Santosha Kelamane ◽  
Srinath Satyanarayana ◽  
Shashidhar ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-26
Author(s):  
Tirsa Hizkia Saverina Nugroho ◽  
Anindita Soetadji ◽  
Dea Amarilisa Adespin ◽  
Stefani Candra Firmanti

Background: The implementation of isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) among children under five years old in close contact with sputum smear-positive TB patients is still low. Only 21,7% of children implemented the IPT in Central Java in 2017. Assessment of the barriers to IPT implementation needs to be carried out in the control of child TB cases.Objective: To analyze the barriers to IPT implementation among children under five years old in close contact with sputum smear-positive TB patients.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among children (age <5 years) in close contact with sputum smear-positive TB patients. Data were collected from KRMT Wongsonegoro Hospital, Dr. Adhyatma, MPH Hospital, Puskesmas Kedungmundu, and Puskesmas Bandarharjo. Structured questionnaires were used to obtain sociodemographic information and to identify associated barriers to IPT implementation. The data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test.Results: The majority (93,3%) of the total subject (75) of this study did not implement the IPT. The results of the bivariate analysis showed that distance to health facilities (p=0.024), perceived barriers (p=0.016), and cues to action (p=0.001) had a significant association as barriers to IPT implementation. Meanwhile age (p=0.622), gender (p=2.121), education level (p=0.073), economic level (p=0.521), knowledge level (p=0.166), and perceived threats (p=0.316) had no significant association as barriers to IPT implementation.Conclusion: IPT implementation rate is low. The barriers were distance to health facilities, perceived barriers, and cues to action.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
Yesaya K Mwasubila ◽  
Issa Sabi ◽  
Rogatus Kabyemera ◽  
Nyanda E Ntinginya ◽  
Reginald Sauve ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Rahman ◽  
M Banerjee ◽  
M Rahman ◽  
FU Akhter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document