scholarly journals Whole-body protein kinetics in critically ill patients during 50 or 100% energy provision by enteral nutrition: A randomized cross-over study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. e0240045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Sundström Rehal ◽  
Felix Liebau ◽  
Jan Wernerman ◽  
Olav Rooyackers
Critical Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. R158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agneta Berg ◽  
Olav Rooyackers ◽  
Bo-Michael Bellander ◽  
Jan Wernerman

2015 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 549-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Liebau ◽  
Jan Wernerman ◽  
Luc JC van Loon ◽  
Olav Rooyackers

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olav Rooyackers ◽  
Ramin Kouchek-Zadeh ◽  
Inga Tjäder ◽  
Åke Norberg ◽  
Maria Klaude ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 385-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayse Gulsah Atasever ◽  
Perihan Ergin ozcan ◽  
Kamber Kasali ◽  
Taner Abdullah ◽  
Gunseli Orhun ◽  
...  

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Magdalena Hoffmann ◽  
Christine Maria Schwarz ◽  
Stefan Fürst ◽  
Christina Starchl ◽  
Elisabeth Lobmeyr ◽  
...  

Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) have a high risk of developing malnutrition, and this is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. In clinical practice, nutrition, including enteral nutrition (EN), is often not prioritized. Resulting from this, risks and safety issues for patients and healthcare professionals can emerge. The aim of this literature review, inspired by the Rapid Review Guidebook by Dobbins, 2017, was to identify risks and safety issues for patient safety in the management of EN in critically ill patients in the ICU. Three databases were used to identify studies between 2009 and 2020. We assessed 3495 studies for eligibility and included 62 in our narrative synthesis. Several risks and problems were identified: No use of clinical assessment or screening nutrition assessment, inadequate tube management, missing energy target, missing a nutritionist, bad hygiene and handling, wrong time management and speed, nutritional interruptions, wrong body position, gastrointestinal complication and infections, missing or not using guidelines, understaffing, and lack of education. Raising awareness of these risks is a central aspect in patient safety in ICU. Clinical experts can use a checklist with 12 identified top risks and the recommendations drawn up to carry out their own risk analysis in clinical practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Angela Bonomo ◽  
Diane Lynn Blume ◽  
Katie Davis ◽  
Hee Jun Kim

Background At least 80% of ordered enteral nutrition should be delivered to improve outcomes in critical care patients. However, these patients typically receive 60% to 70% of ordered enteral nutrition volume. In a practice review within a 28-bed medical-surgical adult intensive care unit, patients received a median of 67.5% of ordered enteral nutrition with standard rate-based feeding. Volume-based feeding is recommended to deliver adequate enteral nutrition to critically ill patients. Objective To use a quality improvement project to increase the volume of enteral nutrition delivered in the medical-surgical intensive care unit. Methods Percentages of target volume achieved were monitored in 73 patients. Comparisons between the rate-based and volume-based feeding groups used nonparametric quality of medians test or the χ2 test. A customized volume-based feeding protocol and order set were created according to published protocols and then implemented. Standardized education included lecture, demonstration, written material, and active personal involvement, followed by a scenario-based test to apply learning. Results Immediately after implementation of this practice change, delivered enteral nutrition volume increased, resulting in a median delivery of 99.8% of ordered volume (P = .003). Delivery of a mean of 98% ordered volume was sustained over the 15 months following implementation. Conclusions Implementation of volume-based feeding optimized enteral nutrition delivery to critically ill patients in this medical-surgical intensive care unit. This success can be attributed to a comprehensive, individualized, and proactive process design and educational approach. The process can be adapted to quality improvement initiatives with other patient populations and units.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document