scholarly journals Telemedicine experience of NYC Internal Medicine residents during COVID-19 pandemic

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246762
Author(s):  
Chia-Yu Chiu ◽  
Amara Sarwal ◽  
Muzamil Jawed ◽  
Venkata Sireesha Chemarthi ◽  
Nehad Shabarek
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
New York ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
South Bronx ◽  
Career Plans ◽  
Future Career ◽  
Internal Medicine Residents

Background The COVID-19 pandemic challenged the resilience of public health, including diagnostic testing, antiviral development and transmission prevention. In addition, it also affected the medical education of many residents and learners throughout the country. Historically, physicians undergoing their residency training were not involved in telemedicine. However, in response to the challenges faced due to COVID-19, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) released a provision in May 2020 to allow residents to participate in telemedicine. Method Lincoln Medical Center, located in the South Bronx of New York City, currently has 115 Internal Medicine residents, and telemedicine clinic visits have been conducted by residents since June 2020. An anonymous 25-question survey was sent to all Internal Medicine residents between August 8, 2020 to August 14, 2020. Result Of 115 residents, 95 (82.6% of the residents) replied to this questionnaire. Residents revealed feeling less confident in managing chronic diseases through telemedicine visits. The survey also shows that 83.1% of respondents prefer in-person visits during their training, 65.3% feel that the telemedicine experience will affect their future career choice, and 67.4% would prefer less than 50% of visits to be telemedicine in their future careers. Outcome The purpose of the new ACGME rules allowing telemedicine was to prevent the undertraining of residents and maintain health care for the patient during the COVID-19 pandemic. This affects residency training and the experiences of residents, which in turn can influence their future career plans.

Drug Alert Experience and Salience during Medical Residency at Two Healthcare Institutions

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 355-361
Author(s):  
Kinjal Gadhiya ◽  
Edgar Zamora ◽  
Salim M. Saiyed ◽  
David Friedlander ◽  
David C. Kaelber
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Internal Medicine Resident ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
University Of Pennsylvania ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Medicine Resident ◽  
Internal Medicine Residents ◽  
The University

Abstract Background Drug alerts are clinical decision support tools intended to prevent medication misadministration. In teaching hospitals, residents encounter the majority of the drug alerts while learning under variable workloads and responsibilities that may have an impact on drug-alert response rates. Objectives This study was aimed to explore drug-alert experience and salience among postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1), postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2), and postgraduate year 3 (PGY-3) internal medicine resident physicians at two different institutions. Methods Drug-alert information was queried from the electronic health record (EHR) for 47 internal medicine residents at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center (UPMC) Pinnacle in Pennsylvania, and 79 internal medicine residents at the MetroHealth System (MHS) in Ohio from December 2018 through February 2019. Salience was defined as the percentage of drug alerts resulting in removal or modification of the triggering order. Comparisons were made across institutions, residency training year, and alert burden. Results A total of 126 residents were exposed to 52,624 alerts over a 3-month period. UPMC Pinnacle had 15,574 alerts with 47 residents and MHS had 37,050 alerts with 79 residents. At MHS, salience was 8.6% which was lower than UPMC Pinnacle with 15%. The relatively lower salience (42% lower) at MHS corresponded to a greater number of alerts-per-resident (41% higher) compared with UPMC Pinnacle. Overall, salience was 11.6% for PGY-1, 10.5% for PGY-2, and 8.9% for PGY-3 residents. Conclusion Our results are suggestive of long-term drug-alert desensitization during progressive residency training. A higher number of alerts-per-resident correlating with a lower salience suggests alert fatigue; however, other factors should also be considered including differences in workload and culture.

scholarly journals Internal medicine residents identify gaps in medical education on outpatient referrals

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masha J. Slavin ◽  
Mangala Rajan ◽  
Lisa M. Kern
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
New York ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Ambulatory Setting ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Internal Medicine Residents ◽  
Strongly Agree ◽  
Residents Attitudes

Abstract Background Relevant clinical information is often missing when a patient sees a specialist after being referred by another physician in the ambulatory setting. This can result in missed or delayed diagnoses, delayed treatment, unnecessary testing, and drug interactions. Residents’ attitudes toward providing clinical information at the time of referral and their perspectives toward training on referral skills are not clear. We sought to assess internal medicine residents’ attitudes toward and experiences with outpatient referrals. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey in October–December 2018 of all internal medicine interns and residents affiliated with a large, urban internal medicine residency program in New York, NY. We used a novel survey instrument that included 13 questions about attitudes toward and experiences with outpatient referrals. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the results. Results Overall, 122 of 132 residents participated (92% response rate). Respondents were approximately equally distributed across post-graduate years 1–3. Although 83% of residents reported that it is “always” important to provide the clinical reason for a referral, only 11% stated that they “always” provide a sufficient amount of clinical information for the consulting provider when making a referral. Only 9% of residents “strongly agree” that residency provides sufficient training in knowing when to refer patients, and only 8% “strongly agree” that residency provides sufficient training in what information to provide the consulting physician. Conclusions These results suggest a substantial discrepancy between the amount of information residents believe they should provide at the time of a referral and the amount they actually provide. Many residents report not receiving adequate training during residency on when to refer patients and what clinical information to provide at the time of referral. Improvements to medical education regarding outpatient referrals are urgently needed.

scholarly journals Internal Medicine Resident Work Absence During the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Large Academic Medical Center in New York City

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 682-685
Author(s):  
Ross Merkin ◽  
Ariel Kruger ◽  
Gaurav Bhardwaj ◽  
Grace R. Kajita ◽  
Lauren Shapiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
New York ◽  
New York City ◽  
York City ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Work Absence ◽  
Patient Exposure ◽  
Internal Medicine Residents ◽  
Resident Work ◽  
Over Time

ABSTRACT Background Montefiore Medical Center (MMC) is a large tertiary care center in the Bronx, New York City, with 245 internal medicine residents. Beginning on February 29, 2020, residents became ill with COVID-19-like illness (CLI), which required absence from work. There was initially a shortage of personal protective equipment and delays in SARS-CoV-2 testing, which gradually improved during March and April 2020. Objective We evaluated the relationship between CLI-related work absence rates of internal medicine residents and MMC's COVID-19 hospital census over time. Methods Data on resident work absence between February 29 and May 22 were reviewed along with MMC's COVID-19 hospital census data. To determine the effect of patient exposure on resident CLI incidence, we compared the mean incidence of CLI per patient exposure days (PED = daily hospital census × days pre- or post-peak) before and after peak COVID-19 hospital census. Results Forty-two percent (103 of 245) of internal medicine residents were absent from work, resulting in 875 missed workdays. At the peak of resident work absence, 16% (38 of 245) were out sick. Residents were absent for a median of 7 days (IQR 6–9.5 days). Mean resident CLI incidence per PED (CLI/PED) was 13.9-fold lower post-peak compared to pre-peak (P = .003). Conclusions At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City, a large portion of internal medicine residents at this single center became ill. However, the incidence of CLI decreased over time, despite ongoing exposure to patients with COVID-19.

scholarly journals EMR-based handoff tool improves completeness of internal medicine residents’ handoffs

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e000188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L Tisdale ◽  
Zac Eggers ◽  
Lisa Shieh
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Internal Medicine Resident ◽  
Objective Data ◽  
Code Status ◽  
Medicine Resident ◽  
Communication Breakdown ◽  
Internal Medicine Residents ◽  
Action List ◽  
Identical Fashion

BackgroundThe majority of adverse events in healthcare involve communication breakdown. Physician-to-physician handoffs are particularly prone to communication errors, yet have been shown to be more complete when systematised according to a standardised bundle. Interventions that improve thoroughness of handoffs have not been widely studied.AimTo measure the effect of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based handoff tool on handoff completeness.InterventionThis EMR-based handoff tool included a radio button prompting users to classify patients as stable, a ‘watcher’ or unstable. It automatically pulled in EMR data on the patient’s 24-hour vitals, common lab tests and code status. Finally, it provided text boxes labelled ‘Active Issues’, ‘Action List (To-Dos)’ and ‘If/Then’ to fill in.Implementation and evaluationWritten handoffs from general and specialty (haematology, oncology, cardiology) Internal Medicine resident-run inpatient wards were evaluated on a randomly chosen representative sample of days in April and May 2015 at Stanford University Medical Center, focusing on a predefined set of content elements. The intervention was then implemented in June 2015 with postintervention data collected in an identical fashion in August to September 2016.ResultsHandoff completeness improved significantly (p<0.0001). Improvement in inclusion of illness severity was notable for its magnitude and its importance in establishing a consistent mental model of a patient. Elements that automatically pulled in data and those prompting users to actively fill in data both improved.ConclusionA simple EMR-based handoff tool providing a mix of frameworks for completion and automatic pull-in of objective data improved handoff completeness. This suggests that EMR-based interventions may be effective at improving handoffs, possibly leading to fewer medical errors and better patient care.

scholarly journals Timing and Predictors of Subspecialty Career Choice Among Internal Medicine Residents: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-216
Author(s):  
Jingkun Yang ◽  
Surbhi Singhal ◽  
Yingjie Weng ◽  
Jason P. Bentley ◽  
Neel Chari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Career Choice ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Career Choices ◽  
Hospital Medicine ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Clinical Exposure ◽  
Internal Medicine Residents ◽  
Primary Care Hospital ◽  
Early Clinical Exposure

ABSTRACT Background Internal medicine residents face numerous career options after residency training. Little is known about when residents make their final career choice. Objective We assessed the timing and predictive factors of final career choices among internal medicine residents at graduation, including demographics, pre-residency career preferences, and rotation scheduling. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of graduates of an academic internal medicine residency program from 2014 to 2017. Main measures included demographics, rotation schedules, and self-reported career choices for residents at 5 time points: recruitment day, immediately after Match Day, end of postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1), end of PGY-2, and at graduation. Results Of the 138 residents eligible for the study, 5 were excluded based on participation in a fast-track program for an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education subspecialty fellowship. Among the remaining 133 residents, 48 (36%) pursued general internal medicine fields and 78 (59%) pursued fellowship training. Career choices from recruitment day, Match Day, and PGY-1 were only weakly predictive of the career choice. Many choices demonstrated low concordance throughout training, and general medicine fields (primary care, hospital medicine) were frequently not decided until after PGY-2. Early clinical exposure to subspecialty rotations did not predict final career choice. Conclusions Early career choices before and during residency training may have low predictability toward final career choices upon graduation in internal medicine. These choices may continue to have low predictability beyond PGY-2 for many specialties. Early clinical exposure may not predict final career choice for subspecialties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document