scholarly journals Patients Are Not Given Quality-Of-Care Data About Skilled Nursing Facilities When Discharged From Hospitals

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 1385-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise A. Tyler ◽  
Emily A. Gadbois ◽  
John P. McHugh ◽  
Renée R. Shield ◽  
Ulrika Winblad ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Chapin White

In 1998, Medicare began phasing in a new prospective payment system (PPS) for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). This paper measures facility-level changes in nurse staffing and quality at freestanding SNFs from 1997 (pre-PPS) to 2001 (post-PPS). Findings show a positive but small association between changes in payment levels and changes in nurse staffing. Among for-profits, the elimination of cost reimbursement is associated with a large drop in nurse staffing. Additionally, the elimination of cost reimbursement is associated with worsening in one of four measures of quality of care; however, the quality results are not statistically robust.


2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 689-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez ◽  
Momotazur Rahman ◽  
Dana B Mukamel ◽  
Vincent Mor ◽  
Amal N Trivedi

2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 315-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlene Harrington ◽  
Steffie Woolhandler ◽  
Joseph Mullan ◽  
Helen Carrillo ◽  
David U. Himmelstein

Quality problems have long plagued the nursing home industry. While two-thirds of U.S. nursing homes are investor-owned, few studies have examined the impact of investor-ownership on the quality of care. The authors analyzed 1998 data from inspections of 13,693 nursing facilities representing virtually all U.S. nursing homes. They grouped deficiency citations issued by inspectors into three categories (“quality of care,” “quality of life,” and “other”) and compared deficiency rates in investor-owned, nonprofit, and public nursing homes. A multivariate model was used to control for case mix, percentage of residents covered by Medicaid, whether the facility was hospital-based, whether it was a skilled nursing facility for Medicare only, chain ownership, and location by state. The study also assessed nurse staffing. The authors found that investor-owned nursing homes provide worse care and less nursing care than nonprofit or public homes. Investor-owned facilities averaged 5.89 deficiencies per home, 46.5 percent higher than nonprofit and 43.0 percent higher than public facilities, and also had more of each category of deficiency. In the multivariate analysis, investor-ownership predicted 0.679 additional deficiencies per home; chain-ownership predicted an additional 0.633 deficiencies per home. Nurse staffing ratios were markedly lower at investor-owned homes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1705-1711.e3
Author(s):  
Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez ◽  
Chanee D. Fabius ◽  
Shekinah Fashaw ◽  
Brian Downer ◽  
Amit Kumar ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 796-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca I. Buijck ◽  
Sytse U. Zuidema ◽  
Monica S. van Eijk ◽  
Debby L. Gerritsen ◽  
Raymond TCM Koopmans ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. PCRT.S3296
Author(s):  
Sean O'Mahony ◽  
Patricia Marthone ◽  
Gabriella Santoro ◽  
Clare Horn ◽  
Sandy Selikson ◽  
...  

Currently about 25% of Americans die in nursing homes, many with poorly controlled pain and other symptoms, with minimal provisions for psychosocial support. New models are necessary to lessen structural and process barriers to give effective end-of-life care in nursing homes. Objectives 1) To extend hospital-based Bioethics Consultation Services (BCS) and Palliative Care Services (PCS) at Montefiore Medical Center (MMC) in the Bronx to two local Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs), Morningside House Aging in America (MSH) using direct face-to-face consultations and Beth Abraham Health Systems (BAHS) via video consultations (VC); 2) Achieve improvements in quality of life and comfort for elderly residents and their families; 2a) Improve the level of practice and increase staff satisfaction with palliative care content-related knowledge and bioethical analysis. Methods We report preliminary findings of this two group quasi experimental project with results of pre- and post-tests rating content-related knowledge in aspects of end-of-life care for staff. Select pre-test and post-test questions were given to physicians and other staff, but were re-configured for, registered and licensed practice nurses, social workers, and certified nursing assistants from the End-of-Life Physician Education Resource Center (EPERC). Patient, family, and staff ratings of the quality of palliative care were measured with a Palliative Outcomes Scale (POS) one week prior to and post consultation. Results 72 staff attended in-services; 53 completed pre-tests and 49 post-tests. Overall knowledge scores increased for 9 of the 16 items that were analyzed. There were improvements in knowledge scores in 12 of 16 items tested for staff content related knowledge which were statistically significant in regard to management of cancer pain from 63.8% to 81.5% (p = 0.03) and a trend to significance for assessment and management of delirium from 31.6% to 61.9% (p = 0.073). Seventy five POS surveys were completed from 13 video-conferenced Palliative Care consultations and 14 direct face-to-face consultations from March 2008 to January 2009. There were improvements in ratings for some aspects of quality of care on the POS. Patient and staff aggregate response scores for the POS were significantly improved between baseline and follow-up (Wilcoxon signed-rank test p = 0.0143 and p = 0.005) at the videoconsultation site and for family and staff at the face-to-face consultation site (Wilcoxon signed-rank test p = 0.0016 and p = 0.0012). Conclusion Preliminary evidence suggests that use of real time videoconferencing to connect hospital-based Bioethics and Palliative Care clinicians with patients, families, and staff in Skilled Nursing Facilities may enhance some aspects of end-of-life care for their residents, as well as content related knowledge in core aspects of end-of-life care for interdisciplinary groups of staff or caregivers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S703-S703
Author(s):  
Marlene Steinheiser

Abstract The purpose of this hermeneutic interpretive phenomenology study was to describe the shared meaning of compassion fatigue (CF) among registered nurses (RNs) who work in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The specific aims were to describe: 1) contributors (triggers, situation, or patient characteristics) that cause symptoms of compassion fatigue, 2) associated physical and emotional symptoms, and 3) the short-term outcomes of unresolved compassion fatigue impacting nurses and patient care. CF can negatively impact patient outcomes, is associated with decreased quality of patient care, and can be a reason why nurses leave the profession. Eight participants were interviewed three times each, while concurrent data analysis helped to formulate mutual understanding of the phenomenon and informed subsequent interviews. Self-reflection, journaling, record keeping, and use of direct quotes enhanced trustworthiness. Four shared meanings were abstracted:1) I feel conflicted and that causes my CF; 2) physical and emotional manifestations of CF; 3) CF is infused in every aspect of my life; 4) we are trying to cope with CF. The participants shared their central desire to make a difference in the lives of their patients, which was of paramount importance. When participants felt they were unable to make the desired difference, they began to develop symptoms of CF. Symptoms were compounded when they experienced frequent patient deaths. A resiliency program specifically addressing the needs of SNF nurses, incorporating individuals and their organizations, could positively impact the nurses’ professional quality of life. Future research is needed to better understand CF and interventions specific to SNF nurses.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S160-S160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamanna Hossin ◽  
Mozhdeh Bahranian ◽  
Lyndsay Taylor ◽  
David Nace ◽  
Christopher Crnich

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document