TIME TO ANTIBIOTIC ADMINISTRATION AND OUTCOME IN SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK

CHEST Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 495A
Author(s):  
Henry Ostman ◽  
Vinay K. Sharma ◽  
Karim Djekidel ◽  
Alan Haber
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

A multifaceted educational intervention shortened time to antibiotic administration in children with severe sepsis and septic shock: ABISS Edusepsis pediatric study

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 1916-1918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Esteban ◽  
Sylvia Belda ◽  
Patricia García-Soler ◽  
Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez ◽  
Cristina Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Educational Intervention ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Pediatric Study ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Epidemiology, recognition and documentation of sepsis in the pre-hospital setting and associated clinical outcomes: a prospective multicenter study

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 168-175
Author(s):  
Nadia Alam ◽  
◽  
Kirtiedevi BNS Doerga ◽  
Tahira Hussain ◽  
Sadia Hussain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Care Chain ◽  
Discharge Letter ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Introduction: General practitioners (GPs) and the emergency medical services (EMS) personnel have a pivotal role as points of entry into the acute care chain. This study was conducted to investigate the recognition of sepsis by GPs and EMS personnel and to evaluate the associations between recognition of sepsis in the pre-hospital setting and patient outcomes. Methods Design: prospective, observational study during a 12 week period in the emergency department (ED) of two academic hospitals. Study population: Patients >18 years presenting with sepsis at the ED. The information available in the ED discharge letter and the ED charts was used to make a definite diagnosis of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock Outcome measures: primary: recognition/documentation of sepsis. Secondary: ED arrival time to antibiotic administration, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Results: A total of 301 patients were included in the study. GPs and EMS personnel correctly identified and documented 31.6% (n=114) and 41.4% of all sepsis patients (n=140) respectively. Recognition and documentation of sepsis improved with increasing severity. The mean time to administration of antibiotics (TTA) was nearly halved for the group of patients where sepsis was documented (GP: 66,4 minutes, EMS: 65,6 minutes) compared to the group in which sepsis was not documented (GP: 123,9 minutes, EMS: 101,5 minutes; p= 0.365 and p= 0.024 respectively). Conclusions: There is room for improvement in the recognition of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock by practitioners working in the pre-hospital setting. Documentation of sepsis prior to arrival in hospital led to a reduced time delay in administration of antibiotics.

scholarly journals Implementation of earlier antibiotic administration in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in Japan: a descriptive analysis of a prospective observational study

Critical Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshikazu Abe ◽  
◽  
Shigeki Kushimoto ◽  
Yasuharu Tokuda ◽  
Gary S. Phillips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Sepsis Care

Abstract Background Time to antibiotic administration is a key element in sepsis care; however, it is difficult to implement sepsis care bundles. Additionally, sepsis is different from other emergent conditions including acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or trauma. We aimed to describe the association between time to antibiotic administration and outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in Japan. Methods This prospective observational study enrolled 1184 adult patients diagnosed with severe sepsis based on the Sepsis-2 criteria and admitted to 59 intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan between January 1, 2016, and March 31, 2017, as the sepsis cohort of the Focused Outcomes Research in Emergency Care in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Sepsis and Trauma (FORECAST) study. We compared the characteristics and in-hospital mortality of patients administered with antibiotics at varying durations after sepsis recognition, i.e., 0–60, 61–120, 121–180, 181–240, 241–360, and 361–1440 min, and estimated the impact of antibiotic timing on risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality using the generalized estimating equation model (GEE) with an exchangeable, within-group correlation matrix, with “hospital” as the grouping variable. Results Data from 1124 patients in 54 hospitals were used for analyses. Of these, 30.5% and 73.9% received antibiotics within 1 h and 3 h, respectively. Overall, the median time to antibiotic administration was 102 min [interquartile range (IQR), 55–189]. Compared with patients diagnosed in the emergency department [90 min (IQR, 48–164 min)], time to antibiotic administration was shortest in patients diagnosed in ICUs [60 min (39–180 min)] and longest in patients transferred from wards [120 min (62–226)]. Overall crude mortality was 23.4%, where patients in the 0–60 min group had the highest mortality (28.0%) and a risk-adjusted mortality rate [28.7% (95% CI 23.3–34.1%)], whereas those in the 61–120 min group had the lowest mortality (20.2%) and risk-adjusted mortality rates [21.6% (95% CI 16.5–26.6%)]. Differences in mortality were noted only between the 0–60 min and 61–120 min groups. Conclusions We could not find any association between earlier antibiotic administration and reduction in in-hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis.

scholarly journals Impact of timely antibiotic administration on outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Min Joo ◽  
Minjung Kathy Chae ◽  
Sung Yeon Hwang ◽  
Sang-Chan Jin ◽  
Tae Rim Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Effect of fluid bolus triggers and their combination on fluid responsiveness in optimization phase of severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitation

MedPharmRes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Bien Le ◽  
Dai Huynh ◽  
Mai Tuan ◽  
Minh Phan ◽  
Thao Pham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Fluid Responsiveness ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Fluid Bolus ◽  
Low Blood Pressure ◽  
Low Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Objectives: to evaluate the fluid responsiveness according to fluid bolus triggers and their combination in severe sepsis and septic shock. Design: observational study. Patients and Methods: patients with severe sepsis and septic shock who already received fluid after rescue phase of resuscitation. Fluid bolus (FB) was prescribed upon perceived hypovolemic manifestations: low central venous pressure (CVP), low blood pressure, tachycardia, low urine output (UOP), hyperlactatemia. FB was performed by Ringer lactate 500 ml/30 min and responsiveness was defined by increasing in stroke volume (SV) ≥15%. Results: 84 patients were enrolled, among them 30 responded to FB (35.7%). Demographic and hemodynamic profile before fluid bolus were similar between responders and non-responders, except CVP was lower in responders (7.3 ± 3.4 mmHg vs 9.2 ± 3.6 mmHg) (p 0.018). Fluid response in low CVP, low blood pressure, tachycardia, low UOP, hyperlactatemia were 48.6%, 47.4%, 38.5%, 37.0%, 36.8% making the odd ratio (OR) of these triggers were 2.81 (1.09-7.27), 1.60 (0.54-4.78), 1.89 (0.58-6.18), 1.15 (0.41-3.27) and 1.27 (0.46-3.53) respectively. Although CVP < 8 mmHg had a higher response rate, the association was not consistent at lower cut-offs. The combination of these triggers appeared to raise fluid response but did not reach statistical significance: 26.7% (1 trigger), 31.0% (2 triggers), 35.7% (3 triggers), 55.6% (4 triggers), 100% (5 triggers). Conclusions: fluid responsiveness was low in optimization phase of resuscitation. No fluid bolus trigger was superior to the others in term of providing a higher responsiveness, their combination did not improve fluid responsiveness as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document