Data for "Assessing Monitoring Program Design Options for Koalas in South East Queensland"

UQ eSpace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Rhodes ◽  
Peter Baxter ◽  
Matthew Holden
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 7346-7359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tse‐Lynn Loh ◽  
Stephanie K. Archer ◽  
Anya Dunham

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 193-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vince R. Vermeul ◽  
James E. Amonette ◽  
Chris E. Strickland ◽  
Mark D. Williams ◽  
Alain Bonneville

ILR Review ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 873-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi L. Short ◽  
Michael W. Toffel ◽  
Andrea R. Hugill

Activism seeking to improve labor conditions in global supply chains has led many transnational corporations to adopt codes of conduct and to monitor suppliers for compliance. Drawing on thousands of audits conducted by a major social auditor, the authors identify structural contingencies in the institutional environment and program design under which codes and monitoring are more likely to be associated with improvements in conditions. At the institutional level, suppliers improve more when they face greater risk that nongovernmental organizations and the press will expose harmful working conditions. They also improve more when their buyers have experienced negative publicity for supply chain labor abuses. At the program design level, suppliers improve more on average when audits are pre-announced, when auditors are highly trained, and especially when both elements are present. Extended analysis of variations across violation types reveals nuances to these findings. For instance, pre-announced audits were followed by greater improvement in occupational safety and health practices but not child labor practices. These findings can inform strategies for improving supply chain working conditions.


1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1935-1948 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Dixon ◽  
Barry Chiswell

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 90-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marissa Bongiovanni Schmitz ◽  
Erin Clover Kelly

In 2013 the state of California launched a cap-and-trade program with a groundbreaking protocol for improved forest management (IFM), providing a framework to monetize carbon sequestration in managed forests. Through in-depth interviews and document review, this research examines California's IFM program development as a case study in stakeholder-engaged ecosystem commodification. We consider how diverse, vested-interest actors contested rival program design options by using the familiar narratives of ecological modernization, green governmentality, and civic environmentalism. The results reveal the benefits and complexities of delegating methodological design to stakeholders who seek direct participation in the market, and highlight the challenges of balancing multiple program objectives, including environmental benefits, legitimacy and market reception, and landowner participation potential. This research provides a unique window into the complex process of forest-offset program design and offers broader lessons for ecosystem markets currently being designed and implemented globally.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document