scholarly journals S1091 Barriers to Hepatitis C Virus Testing According to Latest CDC Recommendations Among Trainees of Internal Medicine and Family Medicine at a Single Tertiary Academic Medical Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. S515-S516
Author(s):  
Naren Nallapeta ◽  
Mary Mikhael ◽  
Jennie Keum ◽  
Eric Hilker ◽  
Emily Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Virus Testing

scholarly journals 864. Adolescent Primary Care Provider Knowledge of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Universal Screening at a Midwest Academic Medical Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S523-S524
Author(s):  
Genevieve Allen ◽  
Jamie Riddell
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis

Abstract Background HIV remains a problem for adolescents with 21% of new infections in the United States in 2018 occurring in youth. In this study we attempted to assess the knowledge of and comfort with pre-exposure prophylaxis and universal HIV testing among adolescent primary care providers affiliated with one academic medical center. Methods We conducted a survey of internal medicine/pediatrics, pediatrics, and family medicine residents and attending physicians affiliated with an academic medical center. Data collected included provider prescribing and referring habits for PrEP and information on their universal HIV testing habits. A “test your knowledge” section followed the survey which asked participants to name PrEP medications and to correctly select laboratory monitoring required for PrEP. Correct answers and prescribing resources were provided on completion of the survey. Results 138 (76%) respondents were aware that PrEP is approved for adolescents. There was no significant difference across specialties or between residents and attendings. 44.8% of respondents felt uncomfortable prescribing PrEP and two thirds had never prescribed PrEP. Reasons for not prescribing PrEP included: not seeing adolescents who qualify (n=80), not having enough training (66), confidentiality concerns (22), forgetting to address PrEP (19), and concern incidence of HIV is too low to recommend PrEP (15). Pediatricians were the least likely to test for HIV with 11% of pediatrician, 32% of internal medicine/pediatric, and 38% of family medicine respondents reported universal HIV testing for patients 15 years and older (p < 0.05). Residents were more likely to test for HIV than attendings (33.3% versus 16%, p < 0.05). 111 participants completed the “test your knowledge” section. 31.5% correctly named two approved PrEP medications. There were 183 responses to the survey (49% response rate). Conclusion Adolescent primary care providers are aware that PrEP is FDA approved for adolescents but a gap in PrEP prescribing and HIV testing persists. There remain perceptions that HIV incidence is too low to discuss PrEP and that providers are not seeing patients who qualify. Next steps include developing an institutional PrEP guideline and creating an electronic medical record order set to facilitate PrEP prescribing. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Preliminary Screening Results Outside the 1945–1965 Birth Cohort: A Forgotten Population for Hepatitis C?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Winetsky ◽  
Jason Zucker ◽  
Jacek Slowikowski ◽  
Matthew Scherer ◽  
Elizabeth C Verna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Birth Cohort ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Preliminary Screening ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Virus Screening

Abstract In December 2017, our academic medical center implemented universal hepatitis C virus screening among adult hospitalized patients. We reviewed charts of patients screening positive outside the birth cohort (1945–1965) in the first 6 months after implementation. Documented risk factors were common in younger patients but rare in patients born before 1945.

scholarly journals Patient Centered Medical Home transformation at an academic medical center

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Randy Wexler ◽  
Jennifer Lehman ◽  
Mary Jo Welker
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Medical Home ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Patient Centered Medical Home ◽  
Model Of Care ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Academic Medical

Background: Primary care is playing an ever increasing role in the design and implementation of new models of healthcare focused on achieving policy ends as put forth by government at both the state and federal level. The Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model is a leading design in this endeavor.Objective: We sought to transform family medicine offices at an academic medical center into the PCMH model of care with improvements in patient outcomes as the end result.Results: Transformation to the PCMH model of care resulted in improved rates of control of diabetes and hypertension and improved prevention measures such as smoking cessation, mammograms, Pneumovax administration, and Tdap vaccination. Readmission rates also improved using a care coordination model.Conclusions: It is possible to transform family medicine offices at academic medical centers in methods consistent with newer models of care such as the PCMH model and to improve patient outcomes. Lessons learned along the way are useful to any practice or system seeking to undertake such transformation.

scholarly journals Family Medicine Patients Have Shorter Length of Stay When Cared for on a Family Medicine Inpatient Service

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 215013271984051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory M. Garrison ◽  
Rachel L. Keuseman ◽  
Christopher L. Boswell ◽  
Jennifer L. Horn ◽  
Nathaniel T. Nielsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Inpatient Service ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
The Family ◽  
Hospital To Home

Introduction: Hospitalists have been shown to have shorter lengths of stays than physicians with concurrent outpatient practices. However, hospitalists at academic medical centers may be less aware of local resources that can support the hospital to home transition for local primary care patients. We hypothesized that local family medicine patients admitted to a family medicine inpatient service have shorter length of stay than those admitted to general hospitalist services which also care for tertiary patients at an academic medical center. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an academic medical center with a department of family medicine providing primary care to over 80 000 local patients. A total of 3100 consecutive family medicine patients admitted to either the family medicine inpatient service or a general medicine inpatient service over 3 years were studied. The primary outcome was length of stay, which was adjusted using multivariate linear regression for demographics, prior utilization, diagnosis, and disease severity. Results: Adjusted length of stay was 33% longer (95% CI 24%-44%) for local family medicine patients admitted to general medicine inpatient services as compared with the family medicine inpatient service. Readmission rates within 30 days were not different (19% vs 16%, P = .14). Conclusions: Local primary care patients were safely discharged from the hospital sooner on the family medicine inpatient service than on general medicine inpatient services. This is likely because the family physicians staffing their inpatient service are more familiar with outpatient resources that can be effectively marshaled to help local patients with the transition from hospital to home.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document