scholarly journals Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery – a modern approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Bekkhan Bayalovich Khatsiev ◽  
Aleksandr Nikolaevich Kuzminov ◽  
Yuriy Ivanovich Yashkov ◽  
Nauruz Akhmatovich Uzdenov

Guidelines for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) are widely used and their efficiency was clearly demonstrated by numerous studies. Number of publications on this topic in bariatric surgery is significantly lower compared with other fields of surgery. However, the data accumulated allow to compose recommendations based on studies with high level of evidence. Authors review existing methods of enhanced recovery in their implementation into bariatric surgery. Enhanced recovery methods can be used to optimize all stages of perioperative care and include data on preoperative preparation, maintenance of electrolyte balance, prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting, sufficient analgesia and safe discharge form hospital. Suggested guidelines for bariatric surgery are implied to be used by a multidisciplinary team.

Author(s):  
Carol J. Peden ◽  
Geeta Aggarwal ◽  
Robert J. Aitken ◽  
Iain D. Anderson ◽  
Nicolai Bang Foss ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols reduce length of stay, complications and costs for a large number of elective surgical procedures. A similar, structured approach appears to improve outcomes, including mortality, for patients undergoing high-risk emergency general surgery, and specifically emergency laparotomy. These are the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of these patients using an ERAS approach. Methods Experts in aspects of management of the high-risk and emergency general surgical patient were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, and MEDLINE database searches on English language publications were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies on each item were selected with particular attention to randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and large cohort studies, and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on non-emergency patients when appropriate. The Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations. The guideline has been divided into two parts: Part 1—Preoperative Care and Part 2—Intraoperative and Postoperative management. This paper provides guidelines for Part 1. Results Twelve components of preoperative care were considered. Consensus was reached after three rounds. Conclusions These guidelines are based on the best available evidence for an ERAS approach to patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Initial management is particularly important for patients with sepsis and physiological derangement. These guidelines should be used to improve outcomes for these high-risk patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. S152
Author(s):  
Kevin J Bree ◽  
John Mitko ◽  
Lala Hussain ◽  
George M Kerlakian ◽  
Kevin M Tymitz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jeremy Prout ◽  
Tanya Jones ◽  
Daniel Martin

This chapter focuses on aspects of anaesthesia for complex, major surgery such as hepatic resection and oesophagectomy. The theories and practice of enhanced recovery after surgery and perioperative optimisation with goal directed therapy are included here. The systemic impact of malignancy and its treatment modalities are also discussed. The practical and ethical aspects of organ transplantation are discussed. Anaesthesia for renal and hepatic transplant is described, as well as considerations for anaesthetising the transplant recipient for non-transplant surgery. Recognition of transurethral resection syndrome in urological surgery is potentially life-saving; causes, management and avoidance are discussed. The NICE criteria for performing bariatric surgery, types of surgery, and conduct of anaesthesia for this challenging patient group is also covered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1134-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Stefura ◽  
Jakub Droś ◽  
Artur Kacprzyk ◽  
Mateusz Wierdak ◽  
Monika Proczko-Stepaniak ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 2065-2083 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Thorell ◽  
A. D. MacCormick ◽  
S. Awad ◽  
N. Reynolds ◽  
D. Roulin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document