scholarly journals Long-term efficacy and safety of netakimab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: results of Phase III international, multicenter, randomized double-blind clinical trial BCD-085-5/ASTERA

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-49
Author(s):  
V. I. Mazurov ◽  
Sh. F. Erdes ◽  
I. Z. Gaydukova ◽  
T. V. Dubinina ◽  
A. M. Pristrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Interleukin 17A ◽  
Asas Criteria ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Tract Infections

Netakimab (NTK) is a humanized anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody. To date, the drug has been approved to treat ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis, and plaque psoriasis. The paper gives the data obtained during 52-week follow-up of AS patients in the phase III ASTERA study.Objective: to study the efficacy and safety of NTK when used long in patients with active AS.Patients and methods. The investigation enrolled 228 patients with active AS, in whom nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or biological agents were ineffective. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive NTK 120 mg or placebo. The drug was administered subcutaneously at weeks 0, 1, 2, and then once every 2 weeks. Patients who received placebo and achieved a 20% improvement according to the ASAS criteria (ASAS20) were excluded from the study at week 16. At this week, patients who took placebo and did not achieve an ASAS20 response were switched to subcutaneous NTK at 120 mg dose once every two weeks. The follow-up period was 52 weeks.Results and discussion. Patients with active AS who received NTK were more likely to respond to treatment than those who took placebo. The proportion of people who achieved 40% improvement (ASAS40) during treatment with NTK increased throughout the follow-up period and amounted to 80.7% at week 52. Positive changes were achieved in all used clinical and laboratory parameters of AS activity. There was also a decrease in inflammatory changes, as shown by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The adverse events (AEs) were mainly laboratory abnormalities and upper respiratory tract infections. Treatment-related AEs were recorded in no more than one third of patients and they were mild to moderate. Severe AEs were singular.Conclusion. Response to NTK therapy generates in the first weeks of drug use and increases throughout a year. The safety profile of NTK when used long is generally favorable.

scholarly journals POS0928 NETAKIMAB EFFICACY IN ANTI-TNF-NAIVE AND ANTI-TNF-EXPERIENCED PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS: RESULTS OF SUBANALYSIS OF PHASE 3 ASTERA TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 726.2-727
Author(s):  
S. Erdes ◽  
V. Mazurov ◽  
T. Dubinina ◽  
I. Gaydukova ◽  
A. Kundzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Interleukin 17 ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Asas Criteria

Background:According to previous studies, the effectiveness of interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors was higher in anti-TNF-naïve patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) [1,2]. Netakimab (NTK) is a humanized anti-IL-17A antibody approved for the treatment of AS, psoriatic arthritis, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Russia and Belarus.Objectives:To compare the efficacy of NTK in anti-TNF-naïve patients with anti-TNF-experienced patients with active AS at week 16 of therapy.Methods:ASTERA (NCT03447704) is an ongoing phase 3 placebo (PBO)-controlled clinical study, aimed at evaluating NTK efficacy in AS [3]. 228 adult patients with active AS (BASDAI ≥ 4) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 120 mg NTK or PBO subcutaneously at week 0,1,2 and then q2w. This analysis includes 112 patients in NTK group. Efficacy endpoints included ASAS20/40, ASAS5/6 and ASAS partial remission (PR) at week 16 of therapy.Results:28 (25.0%) of 112 patients in NTK group had previous inadequate response/intolerance to anti-TNF (anti-TNF-IR): 24 (21.4%) – one anti-TNF, and 4 (3.6%) – two anti-TNF. 84 (75.0%) patients were TNF-naive. Achievement of ASAS criteria response at week 16 was similar in both groups (Table 1).Table 1.Efficacy of NTK at week 16ParameterTNF-naïve (n = 84)anti-TNF-IR (n = 28)p-value*ASAS20, n (%)52 (61.9%)17 (60.7%)0.91ASAS40, n (%)35 (41.7%)11 (39.3%)0.82ASAS5/6, n (%)39 (46.4%)11 (39.3%)0.51ASAS(PR), n (%)15 (17.9%) 4 (14.3%)0.78*- Fisher’s exact testConclusion:NTK 120 mg provided sustained improvements in signs and symptoms of AS in anti-TNF-naive and anti-TNF-IR patients at 16 weeks of therapy.References:[1]Blair HA, Dhillon S. Secukinumab: A Review in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Drugs. 2016;76(10):1023-30.[2]Dougados M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab through 52 weeks in two phase 3, randomised, controlled clinical trials in patients with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (COAST-V and COAST-W). Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(2):176-185.[3]Mazurov VI, et al. Efficacy and safety of Netakimab, anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Results of phase III international, multicenter, randomized double-blind clinical trial BCD-085-5/ASTERA. Nauchno-Practicheskaya Revmatologia=Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2020;58 (4):376–386 (In Russ).Acknowledgements:This study was sponsored by JSC BIOCAD.Disclosure of Interests:Shandor Erdes: None declared, V Mazurov: None declared, Tatiana Dubinina: None declared, Inna Gaydukova Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Biocad, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Alena Kundzer: None declared, Nikolaj Soroka: None declared, Anna Eremeeva Employee of: Biocad

Etanercept in the Longterm Treatment of Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1256-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
BEN DIJKMANS ◽  
PAUL EMERY ◽  
MARKKU HAKALA ◽  
MARJATTA LEIRISALO-REPO ◽  
EMILIO MARTIN MOLA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Tract Infections

Objective.To evaluate the 2-year efficacy and safety of etanercept in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Methods.A 96-week open-label extension study, which followed a 12-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial, was designed to provide longterm efficacy and safety data, including radiographic outcomes, for patients treated with etanercept 25 mg twice weekly (NCT00421980). In all, 81 patients were enrolled (96% of the participants from the double-blind study). Key efficacy measures included improvement using the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20% (ASAS20) criteria, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Radiographic progression was evaluated using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) method. Paired t tests were used to test within-group changes from baseline.Results.The percentage of responders, by ASAS20 criteria, remained relatively constant in patients who received etanercept during the 12-week double-blind study (60% at Week 0 and 83% at Week 96 of the open-label extension); more patients from the placebo group became responders after being switched to etanercept (23% and 74%, respectively). A similar trend was also observed using the ASAS40 and ASAS5/6 criteria, the BASFI, and the BASDAI. Most patients had no change from baseline in mSASSS values. Etanercept was well tolerated; the most frequent adverse events were injection site reactions (n = 30; 37.0%) and headache (n = 18; 22.2%), and the most frequent infections were upper respiratory tract infections (n = 43; 53.1%) and flu syndrome (n = 22; 27.2%).Conclusion.For 2 years, etanercept was clinically effective and well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings.

Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial

2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 3402-3412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Inman ◽  
John C. Davis ◽  
Désirée Van Der Heijde ◽  
Laura Diekman ◽  
Joachim Sieper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

scholarly journals Switching from branded to generic glatiramer acetate: 15-month GATE trial extension results

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (14) ◽  
pp. 1909-1917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Selmaj ◽  
Frederik Barkhof ◽  
Anna N Belova ◽  
Christian Wolf ◽  
Evelyn RW van den Tweel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glatiramer Acetate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Mri Scans ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri

Background: Open-label 15-month follow-up of the double-blind, placebo-controlled Glatiramer Acetate clinical Trial to assess Equivalence with Copaxone® (GATE) trial. Objective: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prolonged generic glatiramer acetate (GTR) treatment and to evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching from brand glatiramer acetate (GA) to GTR treatment. Methods: A total of 729 patients received GTR 20 mg/mL daily. Safety was assessed at months 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 and Expanded Disability Status Scale and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at months 12, 18, and 24. The presence of glatiramer anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) was tested at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24. Results: The mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions in the GTR/GTR and GA/GTR groups was similar at months 12, 18, and 24. The change in other MRI parameters was also similar in the GTR/GTR and GA/GTR groups. The annualized relapse rate (ARR) did not differ between the GTR/GTR and GA/GTR groups, 0.21 and 0.24, respectively. The incidence, spectrum, and severity of reported adverse events did not differ between the GTR/GTR and GA/GTR groups. Glatiramer ADA titers were similar in the GTR/GTR and GA/GTR groups. Conclusion: Efficacy and safety of GTR is maintained over 2 years. Additionally, switching from GA to GTR is safe and well tolerated.

scholarly journals Dual neutralisation of interleukin-17A and interleukin-17F with bimekizumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: results from a 48-week phase IIb, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
Lianne S Gensler ◽  
Atul Deodhar ◽  
Xenofon Baraliakos ◽  
Denis Poddubnyy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
End Point ◽  
Interleukin 17A ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Dose Ranging ◽  
Interleukin 17F

ObjectivesBimekizumab selectively neutralises both interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F. We report efficacy and safety in a phase IIb dose-ranging study in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsAdults with AS (fulfilling modified New York criteria) were randomised 1:1:1:1:1 to bimekizumab 16 mg, 64 mg, 160 mg, 320 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 weeks (double-blind period). At week 12, patients receiving bimekizumab 16 mg, 64 mg or placebo were re-randomised 1:1 to bimekizumab 160 mg or 320 mg every 4 weeks to week 48; other patients continued on their initial dose (dose-blind period). The primary end point was Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 40 response at week 12 (non-responder imputation (NRI) for missing data).Results303 patients were randomised: bimekizumab 16 mg (n=61), 64 mg (n=61), 160 mg (n=60), 320 mg (n=61) or placebo (n=60). At week 12, significantly more bimekizumab-treated patients achieved ASAS40 vs placebo (NRI: 29.5%–46.7% vs 13.3%; p<0.05 all comparisons; OR vs placebo 2.6–5.5 (95% CI 1.0 to 12.9)). A significant dose-response was observed (p<0.001). The primary end point was supported by all secondary efficacy outcomes. At week 48, 58.6% and 62.3% of patients receiving bimekizumab 160 and 320 mg throughout the study achieved ASAS40, respectively (NRI); similar ASAS40 response rates were observed in re-randomised patients. During the double-blind period, treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 26/60 (43.3%) patients receiving placebo and 92/243 (37.9%) receiving bimekizumab.ConclusionsBimekizumab provided rapid and sustained improvements in key outcome measures in patients with active AS, with no unexpected safety findings versus previous studies.Trial registration numberNCT02963506.

Ixekizumab: A Review of Its Use for the Management of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sydney K. Shelton ◽  
Sandra R. Bai ◽  
Joseph K. Jordan ◽  
Amy Heck Sheehan
Keyword(s):  
Plaque Psoriasis ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Biological Agents ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Interleukin 17 ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Severe Plaque Psoriasis ◽  
Tract Infections

Objective: To review the efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of ixekizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Data Sources: PubMed (1966 to July 2018) and clinicaltrials.gov were searched using the terms ixekizumab, LY2439821, interleukin-17, and psoriasis. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Human studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals in English were used. Data Synthesis: The efficacy and safety of ixekizumab has been primarily reported by 4 phase III trials (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3, and UNCOVER-J) and multiple post hoc analyses. The average proportions of patients achieving a 75%, 90%, and 100% reduction in their Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) were 89%, 70%, and 38%, respectively, after 12 weeks of therapy. PASI75 was maintained for up to 3 years in 80.5% of participants. Ixekizumab was statistically significantly more effective than ustekinumab, with 76.5%, compared with 59%, of patients achieving PASI90 in 52 weeks. The most common adverse events include nasopharyngitis (14.1%), upper respiratory tract infections (7.9%), and injection-site reactions (6.8%), which are similar to that for other biological agents. The risk of inflammatory bowel disease may be increased with ixekizumab. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review summarizes and evaluates clinical data regarding the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and discusses relevant differences compared with other biological agents used for the management of chronic plaque psoriasis. Conclusions: Ixekizumab is a highly efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document