scholarly journals Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. What is it?

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
A. V. Gordeev ◽  
Yu. A. Olyunin ◽  
E. A. Galushko ◽  
E. G. Zotkin ◽  
A. M. Lila

The widespread introduction into clinical practice of modern approaches to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the rational use of traditional and targeted antirheumatic drugs can effectively suppress inflammatory activity, restrain the progression of the disease and improve the quality of life of patients. At the same time, in some patients, even after the repeated change of targeted drugs, it is not possible to achieve the target level of RA activity. Serious difficulties arising in the management of such patients raised the question of identifying a special variant of the disease – difficult-to-treat (D2T) RA. The presence of various variants of D2T RA and the need to use a personalized approach to therapy justify the creation of special recommendations for the management of this category of patients. The first step in preparing these recommendations was the definition of D2T RA recently presented by the EULAR working group. It includes three criteria: 1) insufficient effectiveness of the therapy; 2) the presence of an active symptomatic disease; 3) clinical perception.

2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evo Alemao ◽  
Seongjung Joo ◽  
Hugh Kawabata ◽  
Maiwenn J. Al ◽  
Paul D. Allison ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Regina Nasyrova ◽  
Vera Dobrodeeva ◽  
Stanislav Skopin ◽  
Nataliya Shnayder ◽  
Nikolay Neznanov

The article discusses the current state of the use of pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice in the field of psychiatry, narcology and neurology in the Russian Federation. The active introduction of pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice contributes to a personalized approach to predicting the pharmacological response to drugs, increasing the safety and effectiveness of pharmacotherapy, complience and the quality of life of patients with neuropsychiatric disorders. In the future, an increase in the availability of pharmacogenetic testing in real clinical practice is expected.


2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 571-577
Author(s):  
V. N. Amirjanova ◽  
A. E. Karateev ◽  
E. Y. Pogozheva ◽  
A. A. Baranov ◽  
V. I. Mazurov ◽  
...  

Upadacitinib (UPA), a JAK inhibitor, is a new therapeutic option that allows patients with insufficient response to therapy with basic anti-inflammatory drugs (DMARDs) or genetically engineered biological drugs (GEBDs) to achieve the goals of therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the availability of convincing data from international randomized clinical trials, there is insufficient information about the efficacy and safety profile of UPA, the quality of life of patients receiving the drug in real clinical practice.Aim of the study – to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the UPA drug at a dose of 15 mg/day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with moderate and high disease activity and to assess their quality of life in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. The study included 41 patients with RA with insufficient effect of previous therapy with DMARDs or GEBDs, persisting moderate or high disease activity, who were initiated with UPA therapy in 7 rheumatological centers of the Russian Federation. To assess the activity of the disease, standard indices were used: DAS28- ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, CDAI. Functional ability was assessed according to the HAQ questionnaire, quality of life – according to the EQ-5D questionnaire, the activity of the disease according to the patient’s opinion – according to the RAPID-3 index. The HADS scale was used to identify the states of depression, anxiety and emotional disorder.Results. During the first week of taking the drug, there was a marked decrease in pain from 60 to 30 mm on a visual analogue scale, which lasted until the third month of therapy. There was a statistically significant decrease in morning stiffness, the number of painful and swollen joints, health assessments by the doctor and patient, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein (p≤0.001). A decrease in disease activity was also noted according to the dynamics of the activity indices DAS28, SDAI, CDAI (p<0.001). The goals of therapy (remission or low disease activity) by the 3rd month of therapy according to the combined indices of activity DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP reached 44.8 and 63.4% of patients, respectively, according to the SDAI index – 56.7%, according to the CDAI index – 25.9%. A pronounced improvement in joint function (70% improvement according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology) was noted by 33.3% of patients, population indicators of functional state (HAQ≤0.5) had 15.8% of patients. The difference in the HAQ index by the 3rd month of therapy compared to the indicator before treatment was –0.60 points. The quality of life, assessed by patients using the EQ-5D questionnaire, improved in 98.5% of patients, with a 70% improvement noted in more than a third of them (41.7%). The drug was well tolerated, no adverse reactions were registered by the 3rd month of therapy, all patients continued treatment.Conclusions. The first results of the use of UPA in RA patients with insufficient efficacy of previous therapy with DMARDs or GEBDs in real clinical practice indicate its efficacy and safety, an improvement in the functional state and quality of life of patients by the 12th week of the study.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. N. Amirdzhanova ◽  
E. Yu. Pogozheva ◽  
A. E. Karateev ◽  
R. R. Samigullina ◽  
O. B. Nesmeyanova ◽  
...  

Objective: to describe the portrait of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real clinical practice, to assess disease activity from the point of view of a physician and a patient, functional status, quality of life (QOL), and the efficiency of the therapy performed.Patients and methods. The investigation enrolled 976 RA patients from a cohort of patients in the TERMINAL-I multicenter study, who, when visiting a rheumatologist, independently assessed the disease activity and QOL using a computer system (the «Computer Terminals of SelfAssessment for Patients with Rheumatic Diseases» project). The mean age of the patients was 52.30±13.3 years; women accounted for 85%; the median disease duration 8.0 [4.0; 14.0] years. Baseline clinical parameters and pharmacotherapy were evaluated for 6 months. The disease activity was determined by the DAS28 and RAPID-3 indices; functional status and quality of life were evaluated by the HAQ and the EQ-5D, respectively.Results. 83% of the RA patients were positive for rheumatoid factor and 60% were for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies. There was a preponderance of patients with high (40.5%) and moderate (46.8%) RA activity; 6.9% were observed to have a low activity; 5.8% had clinical remission. The mean values of DAS28 and RAPID-3 were 4.7±1.3 and 13.7±3.6, respectively. Only 14.3% of patients had a good functional status that was comparable with the population-based control (HAQ≤0.5). The remaining patients were found to have a substantial decrease in joint functional parameters (median HAQ 1.88 [1.0; 2.5]) and EQ-5D QOL (0.60 [0.60; 0.74). Prosthetic joints were present in 7.4% of patients. At visit 1 to a rheumatologist, the therapy was changed in 15% of patients. During 6-month follow-up, conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were taken by almost all (91.2%) patients. Of them, 70.9% of the patients were treated with methotrexate (MTX): 77.0% received the latter at a dose of 15 mg/week and 23.0% had it at a dose of >15 mg (17.5 to 40 mg/week). Glucocorticoids could be stopped in 20.5% of the patients within six months. Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and anti-B-cell therapy were used in 6.6 and 16.2% of patients, respectively. At 6-month follow-up (Visit 2), 54% of patients achieved a 20% clinical improvement in the ACR criteria. At the same time, the DAS28 scores decreased substantially from 4.5±1.2 to 3.8±1.1 (p = 0.0001). There was a minimal functional improvement in the HAQ index in 64% of patients and a better EQ-D QOL scores in 16%.Conclusion. The majority of RA patients who came to the rheumatologists showed high to moderate disease activity. This was due to long disease duration, inadequate MTX dose, and insufficient patient monitoring in real clinical practice. Introduction of a computer system for selfassessment of their health status by RA patients in an outpatient setting could improve the interaction of physicians, nurses, and patients, better monitor disease activity, and enhance therapeutic efficiency. 


2003 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 574-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simcha M. Russak ◽  
Joseph D. Croft ◽  
Daniell E. Furst ◽  
Andriana Hohlbauch ◽  
Matthew H. Liang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document