scholarly journals Analyser et évaluer la relation entre doctorant et directeur de thèse

Author(s):  
Pascale Haag

La relation entre doctorant et directeur de thèse constitue l’un des principaux déterminants de la réussite du parcours doctoral. Elle est encore peu étudiée, et les instruments de mesure permettant de l’évaluer demeurent peu nombreux dans le champ de la psychologie. Le présent article présente une synthèse des instruments de mesure qui existent aujourd’hui, accompagnée d’une introduction au cadre théorique dans lequel a été construit chacun d’entre eux : Advisory working alliance inventory (AWAI–S) (Schlosser, Gelso, 2001) ; Graduate Studies Supervision Scale – Student Perception (G3S-SP) (Bravo, Saint-Mieux, Dubois, 2007) ; Questionnaire on supervisor–doctoral student interaction (QSDI) (Mainhard, van der Rijst, van Tartwijk, Wubbels, 2009) ; Échelle de mesure du soutien aux besoins fondamentaux (Litalien, Guay, 2015). Des pistes de recherche pour l’avenir faisant usage de tels questionnaires sont proposées.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bárbara Figueiredo ◽  
Pedro Dias ◽  
Vânia Sousa Lima ◽  
Diogo Lamela

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 33-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
G J Ghosh ◽  
P M Mclaren ◽  
J P Watson

The use of videoconferencing in psychotherapy remains largely unexplored. Videoconferencing compromises the range and quality of interactional information and thus might be expected to affect the working alliance (WA) between client and therapist, and consequently the process and outcome of therapy. A single case study exploring the effect of videoconferencing on the development of the WA in the psychological treatment of a female–male transsexual is described. The self-rated Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) was used to measure client and therapist perceptions of the WA after each session over 10 sessions of eclectic therapy conducted over a videolink. The serial WAI measurements charting the development of the WA in 4 cases of 10-session, face-to-face therapy by Horvath and Marx1 were used as a quasi-control. Therapist and client impressions of teletherapy are described. WAI scores were essentially similar to the face-to-face control group except for lower client-rated bond subscale scores. It is suggested that client personality factors accounted for this difference and that videoconferencing did not impair the development of an adequate working alliance or successful therapeutic outcome.


Author(s):  
Olga María Fernandez ◽  
Mariane Krause ◽  
Janet Carola Pérez

Psychotherapy research focusing on adults as well as on children and adolescents has revealed a positive association between the quality of the therapeutic alliance (TA) in the first sessions and therapeutic outcomes. Nevertheless, there is controversy regarding which perspective (of the adolescents, therapists, or parents) and what moment of evaluation (first, second, or third session) is most strongly associated with outcome. This study aims to describe the TA during the initial phase of psychotherapy with adolescents, from several perspectives, and relate it to the intermediate and final outcomes of the therapy. The study is descriptive-correlational and was conducted in naturalistic settings. The sample comprised 20 individual psychotherapeutic processes (15 females, 5 males; average age: 15.8 years; standard deviation=1.04). The variables studied were: TA, measured with the Working Alliance Inventory, applied to adolescents, therapists, and parents, and therapeutic outcomes, measured using Lambert’s Outcome Questionnaire (OQ- 45.2). The results show that the TA improved from session one to session three, both in the adolescents and the therapists. The TA, as perceived by the adolescents in the third session, is positively correlated with final outcomes (r=-.732*, P=.025). The TA evaluated from the therapists’ perspective in the third session, specifically the bond component of the TA, predicts the final success of psychotherapy with adolescent patients [β=0.426, Exp. (B)=1.531, degree of freedom=1, P=0.034]. The importance of the initial construction of the working alliance by both participants is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document