QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY IN SIMULATION MODELING

Author(s):  
Jace Thibault ◽  
Simaan AbouRizk

Uncertainty can be defined as a state of either incomplete or otherwise bounded knowledge. Simulation models, and the engineering systems that they represent, often contain various types of uncertainty. Different approaches and theories can be applied to model these various types of uncertainty with a range of degrees in difficulty and accuracy. The objective of this paper is to explain the various types of uncertainty found in simulation models and to examine where uncertainty can be better represented or potentially reduced. To achieve this objective, a Monte Carlo Simulation model called the As-Planned Model is developed to estimate both cost and schedule using a risk-based approach for a simplified, Light Rail Transit construction project. After the project is complete, the As-Planned model is then compared to the project’s actual results. The resulting conclusions about various types of uncertainty are derived through both output comparison as well as uncertainty analysis.

Author(s):  
Thomas Oscar

The first step in quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) is to determine distribution of pathogen contamination among servings of the food at some point in the farm-to-table chain. In the present study, distribution of Salmonella contamination among servings of chicken liver for use in QMRA was determined at meal preparation. A combination of five methods: 1) whole sample enrichment; 2) quantitative polymerase chain reaction; 3) cultural isolation; 4) serotyping; and 5) Monte Carlo simulation were used to determine Salmonella prevalence (P), number (N), and serotype for different serving sizes. In addition, epidemiological data were used to convert serotype data to virulence (V) values for use in QMRA. A Monte Carlo simulation model based in Excel and simulated with @Risk predicted Salmonella P, N, serotype, and V as a function of serving size from one (58 g) to eight (464 g) chicken livers. Salmonella P of chicken livers was 72.5% (58/80) per 58 g. Four serotypes were isolated from chicken livers: 1) Infantis (P = 28%, V = 4.5); 2) Enteritidis (P = 15%, V = 5); 3) Typhimirium (P = 15%, V = 4.8); and 4) Kentucky (P = 15%, V = 0.8). Median Salmonella N was 1.76 log per 58 g (range: 0 to 4.67 log/58 g) and was not affected ( P > 0.05) by serotype. The model predicted a non-linear increase ( P ≤ 0.05) of Salmonella P from 72.5% per 58 g to 100% per 464 g, minimum N from 0 log per 58 g to 1.28 log per 464 g, and median N from 1.76 log per 58 g to 3.22 log per 464 g. Regardless of serving size, predicted maximum N was 4.74 log, mean V was 3.9, and total N was 6.65 log per lot (10,000 chicken livers). The data acquired and model developed in this study fill an important data and modeling gap in QMRA for Salmonella and chicken liver.


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 2388-2393
Author(s):  
王翔 Wang Xiang ◽  
裴香涛 Pei Xiangtao ◽  
邵鹏 Shao Peng ◽  
黄文浩 Huang Wenhao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document