scholarly journals JUDICIALIZATION OF HEALTH IN RONDONIA STATE: CASE STUDY

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cláudia Ribeiro Pereira Nunes
2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-279
Author(s):  
Willow S. Jacobson ◽  
Sharon R. Paynter

This article examines precursors to leadership practice, specifically through the lens of role identity. The assumption explored is that people are unlikely to engage in the hard work of leadership if they do not see that challenge as part of who they are and what they do, especially collaborative or system-level leadership. Role identity is, then, a critical building block in developing a deeper understanding of leadership intentions and actions especially in collaborative settings. Multiple judicial players, termed here “public service lawyers,” are investigated in this single-state case study that examines individuals’ view of their role and primary focus. Factors are examined that contribute to the construction of role perception. Results reveal that leadership training, the position one holds, and motivational orientation all influence the extent to which public service lawyers develop a view of their role that includes a broader system or collaborative orientation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megean Garvin ◽  
Michael Neary ◽  
Marie Desjardins

1978 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Z. Garcia ◽  
Cal Clark ◽  
Janet Clark
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Eloá Carneiro Carvalho ◽  
Pedro Hugo Dantas de Oliveira Souza ◽  
Thereza Christina Mó y Mó Loureiro Varella ◽  
Norma Valéria Dantas de Oliveira Souza ◽  
Sheila Nascimento Pereira de Farias ◽  
...  

Objective to identify the reasons that led to the judicialization of health care in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic; describe the outcomes of lawsuits concerning health care involving the COVID-19; and analyze the cases of health care judicialization intended to ensure the population’s right to health. Method qualitative, explanatory case study. Data were collected from the websites of the Federal Prosecution Service, Regional Labor Court (1st Region), and the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro. The inclusion criterion was public civil actions that concerned health care and situations involving the COVID-19 pandemic. Two categories emerged from data analysis. Results four cases were identified. Conclusion the judicialization of health care consists of obtaining assets and rights in the courts. These assets and rights are essential to ensure the health of citizens but have been denied in various instances, often due to the omission of the executive and legislative powers. Analyzing the judicialization of health care amidst the pandemic brings focus and highlights the importance of giving voice and visibility to the enormous contingent of the Brazilian society unassisted by public authorities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document