Improving Outcomes in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Sequencing Therapy

Author(s):  
Manuela Schmidinger

Targeted agents have substantially improved outcomes in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. However, due to multiple mechanisms of evasive resistance, almost all patients progress at some point and may require subsequent therapies. Various agents have been explored after failure of first-line treatment in randomized clinical trials. However, so far few questions about the optimal sequence have been answered. Both everolimus and axitinib have been considered standard of care after failure of first-line VEGF-TKI; sorafenib has been proposed as an additional option. In clinical practice, several factors may influence the choice of subsequent treatment: these include considerations on appropriate drug exposure in first-line, gained insights on prognostic and predictive factors as well as mechanisms of resistance. Once the decision in second-line has been made and treatment has been initiated, treating physicians may already be challenged by the question of what to offer in third- and later lines. Treatment beyond second-line treatment isn't supported by strong evidence, and at this stage of disease, retrospective reports on rechallenge may help to guide decisions. In addition, local treatment approaches including metastasectomy and stereotactic radiosurgery may help to optimize outcomes in all treatment lines.

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1028-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Rothermundt ◽  
Alexandra Bailey ◽  
Linda Cerbone ◽  
Tim Eisen ◽  
Bernard Escudier ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14002-e14002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angélique Brunot ◽  
Jean-Christophe Bernhard ◽  
Mokrane Yacoub ◽  
Julien Edeline ◽  
Gregory Verhoest ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (29) ◽  
pp. 2307-2328
Author(s):  
Peter J Goebell ◽  
Philipp Ivanyi ◽  
Jens Bedke ◽  
Lothar Bergmann ◽  
Dominik Berthold ◽  
...  

The therapy of advanced (clear-cell) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has recently experienced tremendous changes. Several new treatments have been developed, with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibition being the backbone of therapy. Diverse immunotherapy combinations change current first-line standards. These changes also require new approaches in subsequent lines of therapy. In an expert panel, we discussed the new treatment options and how they change clinical practice. While first-line immunotherapies introduce a new level of response rates, data on second-line therapies remains poor. This scenario poses a challenge for clinicians as guideline recommendations are based on historical patient cohorts and agents may lack the appropriate label for their in guidelines recommended use. Here, we summarize relevant clinical data and consider appropriate treatment strategies.


ESMO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 100030 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Aeppli ◽  
M. Schmaus ◽  
T. Eisen ◽  
B. Escudier ◽  
V. Grünwald ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document