Analisis Sistem Skoring APACHE II dan SOFA Terhadap Outcome di Intensive Care Unit RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-113
Author(s):  
Habibah Teniya Ariq Fauziyah ◽  
Bambang Pujo Semedi ◽  
Pudji Lestari ◽  
Maulydia Maulydia
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Chronic Health Evaluation ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Health Evaluation ◽  
Scatter Plot ◽  
Chronic Health ◽  
Failure Assessment

Latar belakang: Intensive care unit (ICU) adalah suatu ruangan dari rumah sakit yang khusus untuk merawat pasien yang menderita penyakit, cedera, atau komplikasi yang mengancam jiwa. Pasien yang sedang dilakukan perawatan di ICU dapat diperkirakan prognosisnya menggunakan sistem skoring.Tujuan: Untuk mengetahui hubungan antara sistem skoring acute physiological chronic health evaluation (APACHE II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) hari pertama, SOFA hari ketiga, SOFA hari kelima dengan outcome pasien di ICU RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya.Metode: Prospektif studi analitik observasional. Pengumpulan data dari rekam medis ICU RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya. Subjek penelitiannya adalah pasien berumur ≥17 tahun yang dirawat di ICU minimal lima hari untuk kemudian dibandingkan sistem skoring APACHE II, SOFA hari pertama, SOFA hari ketiga dan SOFA hari kelima terhadap outcome pasien. Sampel penelitian bulan September 2019 hingga Januari 2020 sebanyak 110 pasien, namun yang masuk kriteria inklusi hanya 30 pasien. Data dianalisis menggunakan software SPSS 16 menggunakan uji spearman dan scatter plot.Hasil: Dari 30 pasien ICU, 56.7% berjenis kelamin laki-laki dan 43.3% berjenis kelamin perempuan, kelompok umur terbanyak 46-65 tahun (50%), indeks massa tubuh (IMT) tertinggi pada kategori IMT Normal (60%), diagnosis terbanyak adalah Sepsis sebanyak 14 pasien. (46.7%), pasien tanpa komorbiditas lebih dominan 15 pasien (50%), kondisi akhir pasien lebih banyak pada pasien yang hidup 18 pasien (60%). Hasil uji Spearman dan scatter plot menunjukkan adanya hubungan antara SOFA hari kelima dengan outcome ICU (p <0.05).Kesimpulan: Sistem penilaian SOFA hari kelima dapat memprediksi outcome ICU. Sedangkan APACHE II dan SOFA pada hari pertama dan ketiga tidak dapat memprediksi outcome ICU.

scholarly journals Συγκριτική αξιολόγηση των δεικτών βαρύτητας APACHE II και SOFA στην εκτίμηση της πρόγνωσης σε ασθενείς καρδιολογικών μονάδων

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Γεώργιος Αργυρίου
Keyword(s):  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Chronic Health Evaluation ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Brier Score ◽  
Health Evaluation ◽  
Chronic Health ◽  
Failure Assessment

Σκοπός: Η συγκριτική αξιολόγηση των προγνωστικών δεικτών βαρύτητας acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II και sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) σε καρδιολογικές μονάδες εντατικής θεραπείας (ΚΜΕΘ).Μέθοδος: Πρόκειται για μονοκεντρική, προοπτική μελέτη παρατήρησης, σε ασθενείς με οξέα καρδιολογικά προβλήματα που εισήχθησαν σε ΚΜΕΘ. Τα APACHE II και SOFA υπολογίσθηκαν κατά την είσοδο των ασθενών στην ΚΜΕΘ λαμβάνοντας υπόψη τις χειρότερες τιμές του πρώτου 24ώρου νοσηλείας. Η περιοχή κάτω από την καμπύλη (AUC) χρησιμοποιήθηκε για να αξιολογήσει τη διακριτική ικανότητα των δεικτών στην πρόβλεψη της επιβίωσης στην ΚΜΕΘ, στο νοσοκομείο και 6 μήνες μετά την έξοδο από αυτό. Η βαθμονόμηση και η ακρίβεια των δεικτών ελέχθησαν με τη χρήση του Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test και του Brier score. Οι αναλύσεις έγιναν στο σύνολο του δείγματος και χωριστά σε ασθενείς με οξύ στεφανιαίο σύνδρομο (ΟΣΣ).Αποτελέσματα: Από τους 300 ασθενείς που εισήχθησαν οι 206 είχαν ΟΣΣ. Και οι δύο δείκτες παρουσίασαν καλή διακριτική ικανότητα (AUC εύρος 0,84-0,92) και οι AUC δε διέφεραν σημαντικά μεταξύ τους. Οι τιμές του HL test ήταν υψηλότερες (0,151-0,949 έναντι 0,033-0,531) και του Brier score κοντά στο μηδέν (0,0864-0,1570 έναντι 0,1039-0,1264) για το APACHE II σε σύγκριση με το SOFA. To APACHE II αποτέλεσε τον καλύτερο παράγοντα κινδύνου για την αξιολόγηση της θνησιμότητας στην ΚΜΕΘ (OR=1,24, 95% CI: 1,13-1,37, p<0,001).Συμπέρασμα: Τα APACHE II και SOFA έχουν καλή και συγκρίσιμη διακριτική ικανότητα για την πρόβλεψη της έκβασης. Η βαθμονόμηση και οι δείκτες ακρίβειας είναι καλύτεροι για το APACHE II.

scholarly journals Traqueostomia precoce versus traqueostomia tardia em pacientes com lesão cerebral aguda grave

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno do Valle Pinheiro ◽  
Rodrigo de Oliveira Tostes ◽  
Carolina Ito Brum ◽  
Erich Vidal Carvalho ◽  
Sérgio Paulo Santos Pinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Chronic Health Evaluation ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Health Evaluation ◽  
Chronic Health ◽  
Failure Assessment

OBJETIVO: Comparar os efeitos da traqueostomia precoce e da traqueostomia tardia em pacientes com lesão cerebral aguda grave. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo com 28 pacientes admitidos na UTI do Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora com diagnóstico de lesão cerebral aguda grave e apresentando escore na escala de coma de Glasgow (ECG) < 8 nas primeiras 48 h de internação. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos: traqueostomia precoce (TP), realizada em até 8 dias; e traqueostomia tardia (TT), realizada após 8 dias. Dados demográficos e os escores Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, ECG e Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) do dia da admissão foram coletados. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferenças significativas em relação aos dados demográficos ou aos escores coletados nos grupos TP e TT: APACHE II (26 ± 6 vs. 28 ± 8; p = 0,37), SOFA (6,3 ± 2,7 vs. 7,2 ± 3,0; p = 0,43) e ECG (5,4 ± 1,7 vs. 5,5 ± 1,7; p = 0,87). A mortalidade em 28 dias foi menor no grupo TP (9% vs. 47%; p = 0,04). Pneumonia nosocomial precoce (até 7 dias) foi menos frequente no grupo TP, mas essa diferença não foi significativa (0% vs. 23%, p = 0,13). Não houve diferenças em relação à ocorrência de pneumonia tardia ou ao tempo de ventilação mecânica entre os grupos. CONCLUSÕES: Baseado nesses achados, a traqueostomia precoce deve ser considerada em pacientes com lesão cerebral aguda grave.

scholarly journals Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Pada Angka Kematian Pasien Gagal Nafas

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bambang Suryadi ◽  
Nurul Ainul Shifa
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Chronic Health Evaluation ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Health Evaluation ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Chronic Health

Pendahuluan: dalam penentuan kebutuhan dan prognosis kematian pasien diperlukan skoring kematian di Intensive care unit (ICU). Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan skoring Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) terhadap angka kematian pada pasien gagal nafas di Ruang ICU Rumah Sakit PMI Bogor Tahun 2019. Metode: rancangan dalam penelitian ini adalah cross sectional. Jumlah sampel yaitu 56 pasien gagal nafas. Intrumen menggunakan lembar cheklist apache dan uji statistik menggunakan uji Chi Square. Hasil:Ada hubungan skoring APACHE II terhadap angka kematian pasien gagal nafas di Ruang ICU Rumah Sakit PMI Bogor dengan Pvalue 0,02 dan OR 4,63. Kesimpulan:Ada hubungan skoring APACHE II terhadap angka kematian pasien gagal nafas. Diharapkan perawat membuat integrasi ICU dengan perhitungan APACHE II di ruang ICU.

Does Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Provide a Valid Metric to Directly Compare Disease Severity in Trauma versus Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients?

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 1261-1269
Author(s):  
Robert D. Becher ◽  
Michael C. Chang ◽  
J. Jason Hoth ◽  
Jennifer L. Kendall ◽  
H. Randall Beard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Chronic Health Evaluation ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Health Evaluation ◽  
Chronic Health ◽  
Risk Of Death

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score has never been validated to risk-adjust between critically ill trauma (TICU) and general surgical (SICU) intensive care unit patients, yet it is commonly used for such a purpose. To study this, we evaluated risk of death in TICU and SICU patients with pneumonia. We hypothesized that mortality for a given APACHE II would be significantly different and that using APACHE II to directly compare TICU and SICU patients would not be appropriate. We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted to the TICU or SICU at a tertiary medical center over an 18-month period with pneumonia. Admission APACHE II scores, in-hospital mortality, demographics, and illness characteristics were recorded. One hundred eighty patients met inclusion criteria, 116 in the TICU and 64 in the SICU. Average APACHE II scores were not significantly different in the TICU versus SICU (25 vs 24; P = 0.4607), indicating similar disease severity; overall mortality rates, however, were significantly different (24 vs 50%; P = 0.0004). Components of APACHE II, which contributed to this mortality differential, were Glasgow Coma Score, age, presence of chronic health problems, and operative intervention. APACHE II fails to provide a valid metric to directly compare the severity of disease between TICU and SICU patients with pneumonia. These groups represent distinct populations and should be separated when benchmarking outcomes or creating performance metrics in ICU patients. Improved severity scoring systems are needed to conduct clinically relevant and methodologically valid comparisons between these unique groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document