scholarly journals Polemika s expertním názorem na regulaci náhradního mateřství v České republice

AUC IURIDICA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 37-47
Author(s):  
Kateřina Burešová
Keyword(s):  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Medical Law ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Academic Discussion

As a key result of the three-year research project is labelled the expert opinion published in the Journal of Medical Law and Bioethics. The aim of the project was to identify and analyse problems related to surrogacy in Czech legislation. The key result does not take into account many aspects of surrogacy. Some stated opinions seem very problematic and most of them need to be explained or, at least, put to the ray of extensive consideration. This article shows other, polemic opinions with hopes to be noticed as an academic discussion on such an important topic.

Joint Construction of ‘Facts’ in Court: A Case Study of Microscopic Communication

2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Ohashi ◽  
Naohisa Mori
Keyword(s):  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Eyewitness Testimony ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Joint Construction ◽  
Final Verdict

Eyewitness testimony is generated through communication between the examiner and non-examiner (eyewitness) in interrogation rooms or public courts. In this analysis, the authors have studied the ‘fact-generating’ process microscopically, and the issue of credibility in testifying from one's experience. Specifically, they examined the Kabutoyama case, in which it took more than 20 years to render a final verdict of not guilty. They closely examined the credibility of testimony made by a key witness in the case. After analysing the testimony both qualitatively and quantitatively, they observed several characteristics in the witness-examiner exchanges and consider that non-empirical eyewitness testimony is a product of witness-examiner interactions. This paper is based on a research project carried out to report on expert opinion regarding credibility of eyewitness testimony. Part of the results of this project have already been published by Mori and Ohashi (1997).

Medical Law and Medical Ethics

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Hoppe ◽  
José Miola
Keyword(s):  
Medical Ethics ◽  
Medical Law

Reflections on the Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework

Methodology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Willis ◽  
Hennie Boeije
Keyword(s):  
Research Design ◽  
Cognitive Testing ◽  
Level Of Detail ◽  
Cognitive Interviewing ◽  
Research Groups ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Reporting Framework ◽  
Full Explanation ◽  
Key Steps

Based on the experiences of three research groups using and evaluating the Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework (CIRF), we draw conclusions about the utility of the CIRF as a guide to creating cognitive testing reports. Authors generally found the CIRF checklist to be usable, and that it led to a more complete description of key steps involved. However, despite the explicit direction by the CIRF to include a full explanation of major steps and features (e.g., research objectives and research design), the three cognitive testing reports tended to simply state what was done, without further justification. Authors varied in their judgments concerning whether the CIRF requires the appropriate level of detail. Overall, we believe that current cognitive interviewing practice will benefit from including, within cognitive testing reports, the 10 categories of information specified by the CIRF. Future use of the CIRF may serve to direct the overall research project from the start, and to further the goal of evaluation of specific cognitive interviewing procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document