scholarly journals Extended DNA analyses: surveillance technology at the intersection of racism and sexism

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Bartram ◽  
Tino Plümecke ◽  
Andrea zur Nieden
Planta Medica ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Monschein ◽  
T Holzer ◽  
V Wolkinger ◽  
H Heuberger ◽  
R Seidenberger ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Felicity Amaya Schaeffer

I argue that we are entering an automated era of border control that I label a border-biosecurity industrial complex. Funded in great part by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), scientific research and automated surveillance technologies promise the state innovative and supposedly unbiased solutions to the challenge of border control and security. This article spotlights a border surveillance technology called AVATAR (Automated Virtual Agent for Truth Assessment in Real-Time). Analyzing this technology, which was funded by the DHS and developed by faculty at the University of Arizona’s National Center for Border Security and Immigration (BORDERS), allows me to assess how the emphasis on novel technologies to detect terrorists unleashes the search for ubiquitous surveillance devices programmed to detect deviant behavioral and physiological movements. I offer a wider view of this technology-in-the-making by analyzing how university research in aerial defense, the psychology of deception, the life sciences, and computer engineering influences the development of surveillance devices and techniques. I explore how, during a posthuman era, automated technologies detect and racialize “suspect life” under the guise of scientific neutrality and supposedly free from human interference. Suspect life refers to the racial bias preprogrammed into algorithms that compute danger or risk into certain human movements and regions such as border zones. As these technologies turn the body into matter, they present biological life as a more scientifically verifiable truth than human verbal testimony, moving border control from the adjudication of law through the subjective interview to the automated body that speaks a truth more powerful than a complex story can tell.


Pathology ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Smyth ◽  
Megan A. Helmer ◽  
Luciano Dalla Pozza ◽  
Peter B Rowe

2021 ◽  
pp. 1329878X2110058
Author(s):  
Neil Selwyn ◽  
Chris O’Neill ◽  
Gavin Smith ◽  
Mark Andrejevic ◽  
Xin Gu

The COVID-19 pandemic has seen the rapid but sometimes controversial take-up of ‘online examination proctoring’ systems by universities keen to maintain their assessment schedules during times of campus closure. Following the theoretical tradition of media ‘domestication’, this article examines the mainstream adoption of different online proctoring systems in Australian higher education during the first year of the pandemic. Through analysis of interviews, documents, news, social media and marketing materials, the article examines the ‘appropriation’, ‘objectification’, incorporation’ and ‘conversion’ of proctoring technology from the perspective of commercial providers, university authorities, university staff and student groups. This raises a number of critical issues underpinning the adoption of this exam surveillance technology – not least the surrender of control to commercial providers, the hidden labour required to sustain ‘automated’ systems and the increased vulnerabilities of ‘remote’ studying.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Rojahn ◽  
Luke Pearce ◽  
Dianne M. Gleeson ◽  
Richard P. Duncan ◽  
Dean M. Gilligan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document