Collective negotiation of rural insurance in Brazil: conditions, opportunities, and challenges of a model supported by cooperatives

Author(s):  
Pedro Augusto Martins Loyola <suffix>Junior</suffix> ◽  
Vilmar Rodrigues Moreira ◽  
Claudimar Pereira Da Veiga
Author(s):  
Elisangela Coco Dos Santos ◽  
Francis Sodré ◽  
Luiz Henrique Borges

Description of the collective negotiation process brokered by the Municipal Permanent Negotiation Board


1999 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-200
Author(s):  
Chuks Okpaluba

When the Industrial Relations Act was enacted in Swaziland in 1980 its express object was to provide for the collective negotiation of terms and conditions of employment and for the establishment of an Industrial Court for the settlement of disputes arising out of employment. In turn, the avowed purpose for the establishment of the Industrial Court as the nerve centre and most important institution established by the legislative scheme was, and still is, “for the furtherance, securing and maintenance of good industrial relations and employment conditions in Swaziland”. As in the case of other industrial courts and labour adjudicatory institutions with special and limited jurisdiction elsewhere, issues surrounding the jurisdiction of the Industrial Court of Swaziland have given rise to a measure of controversy.


2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Cangelosi

The double function of language, as a social/communicative means, and as an individual/cognitive capability, derives from its fundamental property that allows us to internally re-represent the world we live in. This is possible through the mechanism of symbol grounding, i.e., the ability to associate entities and states in the external and internal world with internal categorical representations. The symbol grounding mechanism, as language, has both an individual and a social component. The individual component, called the “Physical Symbol Grounding”, refers to the ability of each individual to create an intrinsic link between world entities and internal categorical representations. The social component, called “Social Symbol Grounding”, refers to the collective negotiation for the selection of shared symbols (words) and their grounded meanings. The paper discusses these two aspects of symbol grounding in relation to distributed cognition, using examples from cognitive modeling research on grounded agents and robots.


ILR Review ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 455
Author(s):  
Robert E. Doherty ◽  
Robert E. Woodworth ◽  
Richard B. Peterson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document