Active queue management based congestion control protocol for wireless networks

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Manikandan ◽  
M.A. Saleem Durai
Author(s):  
Md. Shohidul Islam ◽  
Md. Niaz Morshed ◽  
Sk. Shariful Islam ◽  
Md. Mejbahul Azam

Congestion is an un-avoiding issue of networking, and many attempts and mechanisms have been devised to avoid and control congestion in diverse ways. Random Early Discard (RED) is one of such type of algorithm that applies the techniques of Active Queue Management (AQM) to prevent and control congestion and to provide a range of Internet performance facilities. In this chapter, performance of RED algorithm has been measured from different point of views. RED works with Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), and since TCP has several variants, the authors investigated which versions of TCP behave well with RED in terms of few network parameters. Also, performance of RED has been compared with its counterpart Drop Tail algorithm. These statistics are immensely necessary to select the best protocol for Internet performance optimization.


SIMULATION ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 95 (10) ◽  
pp. 979-993
Author(s):  
Carlo Augusto Grazia ◽  
Natale Patriciello ◽  
Martin Klapez ◽  
Maurizio Casoni

Most Internet traffic is carried by the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) nowadays, even in the case of real-time services. Detecting and mitigating the congestion is one of the primary tasks of this protocol, in fact, different TCP versions are defined by their congestion control algorithms. Furthermore, Active Queue Management (AQM) algorithms share the same goal of congestion mitigation with TCP; in particular, the most efficient congestion control occurs when AQM and TCP work together. This paper presents a brief survey and a cross-comparison of the latest and most important TCP and AQM variants, then provides an evaluation of a different kind of performance on the ns-3 network simulator over various types of environments (multiple Round Trip Time, long delay, different congestion levels, etc.). In any shared bottleneck, the choice of the TCP-AQM couple to adopt is crucial. We will show that the results are not univocal and the “one size fits all” solution does not exist. Moreover, the proper couple depends on the performance that we want to boost and on the environment that we have to deal with.


SIMULATION ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 437-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seungwan Ryu ◽  
Byunghan Ryu ◽  
Myoungki Jeong ◽  
Seikwon Park

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document