Strategic alliances for advanced materials' intellectual property value chain: research and technology organisation's perspective

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Bhardwaj ◽  
Gadhe Padmanabham ◽  
Karuna Jain ◽  
Kirankumar S. Momaya ◽  
Shrikant V. Joshi
2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (S6) ◽  
pp. BE43-BE46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bill Barrett ◽  
Dave Crawford

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Qiuyuan Lei ◽  
Cheng Liu ◽  
Wenjing Xie ◽  
Xinzhong Bao

Intellectual property comes with risks such as value evaluation and externalities. It is an intangible asset involving a large investment and a long return period; however, it plays an important role in enhancing the competitiveness of enterprises. Some companies see intellectual property as being a long-term development strategy, which makes evaluating the performance of corporate intellectual property particularly important. The TOPSIS method is widely used to evaluate the pros and cons, as well as the performance of various programs. It can make full use of the data to accurately reflect the gaps in various programs. This paper uses the TOPSIS method to evaluate the performance of the intellectual property value strategy of six typical technology companies based on three dimensions: financial performance, external performance, and value chain performance. The study found that the value chain performance was the most important in the performance evaluation of the intellectual property value strategy, followed by the external performance, and then by the financial performance. There were also significant differences in the intellectual property value strategy of the six technology companies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 586-595
Author(s):  
Fredah Wangui Maina ◽  
John Mburu ◽  
Chris Ackello-Ogutu ◽  
Henrik Egelyng

Abstract Kenya tea and coffee are major foreign exchange earners and have high reputation among consumers in the international market. Faced by declining prices and competition from other sub-sectors, production area under these commodities has been declining. Use of intellectual property (IP) rights to protect and market agricultural commodities has been on the increase. Geographical indications as IP have been successfully implemented in developed countries and increasingly in developing countries. The study assesses producers’ awareness and perceptions of territorial-based qualities and the influence on product profits from the two export beverage crops, tea and coffee. Factor analysis was conducted on Likert scale perception questions administered to producers of coffee and tea from Muranga and Kirinyaga, respectively, in the Central region of Kenya. Producers of the two products were aware of the uniqueness of their products and their geographical source. Only perceptions related to market access in coffee and tea, and policies and rules as well as role of county government in coffee positively influenced income. Rather than have GI as a certification trademark, a prescriptive sui generis law would provide the required streamlining needed for collective participation of various actors along the value chain of potential GI products.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheetal Chopra ◽  
Punkhuri Chawla

The article is an evaluation of the growth of the Indian telecom sector in light of its innovative capabilities and production of intellectual property. The low patent footprint and investment in research and development of the Indian telecom sector shows a lack of focus on innovation and intellectual property creation by the domestic telecom industry, and it is argued that this prevents the sector to tap into its full potential. The economic growth of the telecom sector must be seen holistically, meaning that domestic Indian telecom companies must be internationally competitive and occupy a higher place in the telecommunications value chain. This article argues that regulatory focus needs to shift towards encouraging and protecting intellectual property in India, so as to incentivize investment in expansion of technological capabilities through R&D.


2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Basant

Indian government has undertaken significant modifications in the Intellectual Property (IP) regime of the country. This is leading to a realignment of business strategies by firms in several sectors. Similarly, with liberalization and globalization, new opportunities for IP creation seem to be emerging for Indian firms. Unfortunately, writing on these issues has been more emotional and few are willing to look at the issues dispassionately and in a pragmatic manner. A more informed debate on what is required in the new Intellectual Property Act to facilitate active participation of Indian firms in the global technology and production networks is desirable. Given the fact that IT is a growth sector for the country, one needs to assess the utility of various TRIPS compatible policy alternatives. In this context, this paper attempts to document the emerging perspectives vis-�-vis IPRs in the Indian IT industry and explore factors that are driving the change in perspectives. This paper suggests that: Perspectives on IP are changing rapidly: Large IT firms and firms in high-end niche areas are proactively seeking IP-based growth strategies. While they typically seek IP protection in Western nations and not so much in India, this has led them to perceive restrictive IP regimes more positively. IP regimes in the West are more relevant for IP creating Indian IT firms today but this may change in the near future as Indian market expands. Significant IP creation by MNC subsidiaries in India is also contributing to this change in perception. Survey data show that an average IT firm in India also perceives IP protection as an important appropriability mechanism, but access to markets and relevant complementary assets continue to be more important for appropriating profits from their economic activity. The demands for IP policy change reflect these changing perceptions: A positive view of the restrictive IP regimes also gets reflected in the demands of Indian industry associations for changes in the Indian law. Broadly, these changes in perceptions seem to be linked to the evolving global production networks, changing activity profile of Indian IT firms, emerging business opportunities, and changes in the competitive scenario. The understanding of Indian IT firms of the complexities of IP regimes remains rudimentary: Indian firms need significant preparation to deal with IP-related challenges. The policy choice among available TRIPS compatible options needs to be careful: Policy needs to facilitate the participation of Indian IT firms in emerging complex segments of the sector and contribute to new IP creation. This requires a systematic understanding of trends in technologies and global production networks to ascertain the segments in which Indian firms can potentially participate effectively and move up the value chain. However, it also needs to ensure that this sector is not mired in unnecessary IP-related litigation instead of unleashing impulses for creating new enterprises in the sector and for sustainable growth of the incumbents.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-44
Author(s):  
DARSHANA KUMARI RAGUPATHY ◽  
SHAMSUDDIN BAHARIN ◽  
FAIZ MOHD TURAN

In developed countries, universities are reputed as hub of innovation, contrarily to developing countries, universities are intermediary platforms for the diffusion of technology from large manufacturing companies to the value chain. The Malaysian Government through its blueprints emphasize that public universities have an important role in supporting innovation and technology commercialization. Despite myriad initiatives created and executed to help universities in improving their ability to innovate, the outcomes have yet to meet national expectations. This suggests a lack of awareness on the influence of universities especially in University Industry Collaboration (UIC) towards sustainable development in the innovation ecosystem. On that grounds, it is important to address this research gap, for it will provide insights to manufacturing companies and help universities themselves in being instrumental towards the intensification of UIC. The intent of this paper is to determine the role of public universities in UIC within the Malaysian manufacturing landscape. This paper is based on findings of a quantitative approach through survey questionnaire. A total of 20 public universities and 40 large manufacturing companies were surveyed and analysed using Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. For further evidence, registered intellectual property was analysed using One sample T-test. The percentage of expenditure of R&D per export value by large manufacturing companies in Malaysia was used as test value to determine the current role of public universities within the Malaysian manufacturing landscape. The findings reveal, public universities in Malaysia remain as intermediary platforms for large manufacturing companies to share their technology with the value chain. As intermediaries, public universities fortify knowledge and product development for large manufacturing companies. The findings further reveal, registered intellectual property by large manufacturing companies is a significant indicator of UIC outcomes through R&D processes. The findings of this paper add to the dimensions of empirical research on the significance of public universities in intensifying UIC. The importance of public universities in creating relevant and sustainable technology is paramount. Only when universities are solicited as hub of innovation by the manufacturing landscape, Malaysia will move up the value chain in manufacturing.  


Marketing ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bojan Krstic ◽  
Suzana Djukic ◽  
Ana Popovic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document