scholarly journals Spinal cord stimulation for lower limb ischemic pain treatment

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Pedrini ◽  
F. Magnoni
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonietta Canna ◽  
Lauri J. Lehto ◽  
Lin Wu ◽  
Sheng Sang ◽  
Hanne Laakso ◽  
...  

AbstractEpidural spinal cord stimulation (ESCS) is widely used for chronic pain treatment, and is also a promising tool for restoring motor function after spinal cord injury. Despite significant positive impact of ESCS, currently available protocols provide limited specificity and efficiency partially due to the limited number of contacts of the leads and to the limited flexibility to vary the spatial distribution of the stimulation field in respect to the spinal cord. Recently, we introduced Orientation Selective (OS) stimulation strategies for deep brain stimulation, and demonstrated their selectivity in rats using functional MRI (fMRI). The method achieves orientation selectivity by controlling the main direction of the electric field gradients using individually driven channels. Here, we introduced a similar OS approach for ESCS, and demonstrated orientation dependent brain activations as detected by brain fMRI. The fMRI activation patterns during spinal cord stimulation demonstrated the complexity of brain networks stimulated by OS-ESCS paradigms, involving brain areas responsible for the transmission of the motor and sensory information. The OS approach may allow targeting ESCS to spinal fibers of different orientations, ultimately making stimulation less dependent on the precision of the electrode implantation.


1989 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 698-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. FIUME ◽  
M. PALOMBI ◽  
V. SCIASSA ◽  
M. TAMORRI

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-114
Author(s):  
A. S. Klinkova ◽  
A. V. Ashurkov ◽  
O. V. Kamenskaya ◽  
A. A. Karpenko ◽  
V. V. Lomivorotov ◽  
...  

Pain Practice ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose De Andrés ◽  
Jose Tatay ◽  
Amparo Revert ◽  
J. C. Valía ◽  
V. Villanueva

2020 ◽  
pp. rapm-2019-100859
Author(s):  
Nagy Mekhail ◽  
Diana S Mehanny ◽  
Sherif Armanyous ◽  
Shrif Costandi ◽  
Youssef Saweris ◽  
...  

Contemporary nonmalignant pain treatment algorithms commence with conservative non-invasive strategies, later progressing from minimally invasive interventions to invasive techniques or implantable devices. The most commonly used implantable devices are spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems or targeted drug delivery (TDD) devices. Historically, SCS had been considered in advance of TDD, positioning TDD behind SCS failures. Following Institutional Review Board approval, data were extracted from electronic medical records of patients who underwent SCS trial in the Department of Pain Management at Cleveland Clinic from 1994 to 2013. The sample size was analyzed in two cohorts: those who succeeded with SCS and those who failed SCS and consequently proceeded to TDD. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed and a predictive formula for successful outcomes was created. 945 patients were included in the cohort of which 119 (12.6%) subjects achieved adequate pain relief with TDD after failure of SCS. Gender, age, depression and primary pain diagnosis were significantly different in this subgroup. Males were 52% less likely to experience pain relief with SCS. The odds of SCS success decreased as age increased by 6% per year. Patients with comorbid depression, interestingly, were 63% more likely to succeed with SCS. A logistic model was created to predict SCS success which was used to create a predictive formula. Older male patients diagnosed with spine-related pain were more likely to benefit from TDD than SCS. This observation potentially identifies a subgroup in whom consideration for TDD in advance of SCS failure could prove more efficient and cost effective. These retrospective findings warrant prospective comparative studies to validate this derived predictive formula.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document