scholarly journals Biosimilar medicines and patient registries – expectations, limitations, and opportunities

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 39-51
Author(s):  
R Sutka ◽  
J Pec ◽  
T Pecova

Abstract Introduction: Biology therapies in a various medical specializations and for a broad spectrum of indications were launched during last two decades. As a new in class the therapies were obliged to provide additional data re gar ding efficacy and safety after their real medical practice integration. Patient registries, databases collecting various patient data, were introduced to grant data on the treatment effectiveness, safety, and long-term on treatment survival. Satisfactory treatment effect and acceptable safety profile were confirmed after couple of years of careful observation. However, the benefits were usually offered at much higher treatment costs compared to the standard therapies. Biologically similar drugs, so-called biosimilars (B.S), are being launched after original molecule patent protection expiry during recent years. They were expected as an ideal solution to avoid distinct impact on the medical budget: comparable effect for less money. The unsubstantiated doubts about biosimilar efficacy and safety were the reason of the late launch in many markets. Since biosimilars are considered as new therapy entities, the cautiousness to certain extent should be required. Information gained from post-marketing observations and patient registries over several years, confirmed the biosimilar product comparable quality. Healthcare budget savings could secure easier therapy access for more new patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ponzio ◽  
M Trojano ◽  
M Capobianco ◽  
M Pugliatti ◽  
M Ulivelli ◽  
...  

Abstract While the safety and efficacy of Disease Modifying Therapy (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) are assessed in clinical trials, these are of relatively short duration and always confined to highly selected patient groups. The evaluation of real-world data such as patient registries, is vital as it offers long-term data collection and is patient rather than product-focused during the lifetime of MS, and allows to document a patient's treatment history throughout the disease course. Patient registries can play an important role in monitoring the safety of drus. Regulators and the pharmaceutical industry have shown interest in complementing or even replacing phase 4 clinical studies with data from MS registries. The Italian MS Register (IMSR), in collaboration with the Big MS Data initiative, that also includes the national MS registries of Denmark, France, and Sweden and the international database network MSBase, came together with industry to conduct studies on post-authorization safety (PASS) and treatment effectiveness. The IMSR includes the clinical history of approximately 55,000 patients, or approximatively 45% of the estimated cases of MS in Italy. More than 10,000 patients have a follow-up duration of over 10 years. A Core Protocol outlining principles of PASS projects was created in which aggregated results made available to sponsors and health authorities. The Core Protocol specifies variables, emphasizes improved capture of adverse events, in particular cancer, non-melanoma skin cancers and immunosuppression-related infections, all MedDRA-coded. EUROCAT codes for pregnancy outcomes are also documented. Regulators, the pharmaceutical industry and national-level registries have jointly identified a format of collaboration on PASS for DMT in MS to benefit patients and the larger society. In this way, we hope to contribute to a framework that will include emerging and existing registries with the common goal of contributing to the advancement of knowledge in MS. Key messages The real-world data can contribute to understanding of the impact of disease-modifying therapy on long term. A format of collaboration among clinical research, regulators and pharmaceutical industry could be a winning framework to improve the knowledge on safety and treatment effectiveness in MS.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A572-A572
Author(s):  
F JABOLI ◽  
E RODA ◽  
C FABBRI ◽  
S MARCHETTO ◽  
F FERRARA ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Kohoutova ◽  
A Tringali ◽  
G Paparella ◽  
V Perri ◽  
I Boškoski ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kungel ◽  
A Engelhardt ◽  
T Spevakné-Göröcs ◽  
M Ebrecht ◽  
C Werner ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1129-P
Author(s):  
SILVINA GALLO ◽  
BERNARD CHARBONNEL ◽  
ALLISON GOLDMAN ◽  
HARRY SHI ◽  
SUSAN HUYCK ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. S25
Author(s):  
Benjamin Ehst ◽  
George Han ◽  
Scott Guenthner ◽  
Kimberly Eads ◽  
Abby Jacobson

Abstract not available.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document