Design of extractive distillation process with mixed entrainer

2015 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Yu. Sazonova ◽  
Valentina M. Raeva ◽  
Alla K. Frolkova

AbstractThe separation of two systems containing minimum boiling azeotropes (acetone-methanol and tetrahydrofuran (THF)-water) was performed using extractive distillation with a heavy boiling mixed entrainer consisting of two compounds. The entrainer constituents did not form new azeotropes with each other and with the components of the original mixture. An analysis of the mixed entrainer influence on the vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) and relative volatility provides an understanding of the cases in which the separation by extractive distillation (ED) in the presence of the mixed entrainer revealed energy benefits over their individual constituents. New results for application of the mixed entrainer monoethanolamine (MEA)-ethylene glycol (EG) and dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO)-glycerol for the separation of THF-water and acetone-methanol, respectively, are presented for the first time. The individual selective agents were chosen from the efficient entrainers discussed in the literature. The calculations were performed using the platform Aspen Plus 7.3. Different extractive distillation flowsheets are provided for the zeotropic mixed agents, viz. with two or three columns. For the ED of the binary mixtures investigated, the structures of the different separation schemes, the operating parameters of the columns, and the energy consumptions are presented and compared. The application of the mixed entrainer MEA-EG fed into the ED column with pre-mixing can be recommended, providing up to 1.7 % of energy saving for acetone-methanol separation. In the case of THF-water, the mixed entrainer DMSO-glycerol provides 0.8 % of energy saving. The separate inputs of the individual constituents of the mixed entrainer led to a significant increase in the energy consumptions of the flowsheet because of the third regeneration column, hence this flowsheet cannot be recommended for use in the separation of both mixtures.

2019 ◽  
Vol 225 ◽  
pp. 41-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ao Yang ◽  
Tao Shi ◽  
Shirui Sun ◽  
Shun'an Wei ◽  
Weifeng Shen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 185-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.D. Brito ◽  
G.M. Cordeiro ◽  
M.F. Figueirêdo ◽  
L.G.S. Vasconcelos ◽  
R.P. Brito

2019 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 195-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang Ma ◽  
Mengxiao Yu ◽  
Yao Dai ◽  
Yixin Ma ◽  
Jun Gao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dmitry A. Ryzhkin ◽  
Valentina M. Raeva

A comparative analysis of energy consumption for extractive distillation flowsheets was carried out. This was done by the example of methanol - ethanol - acetonitrile - mixture. These solvents are used in pharmaceutical industries. The basic system methanol - ethanol - acetonitrile - water contains four binary and one ternary minimum-boiling azeotropes. Pressure change has almost no effect on the location of separatric surfaces. Therefore, extractive distillation should be used to separate solvents mixtures of any composition. Industrial entrainers dimethyl sulfoxide and glycerol are considered as selective agents. The effect of entrainer on vapor-liquid equilibrium at 30 and 101.32 kPa was evaluated by the relative volatility of the components forming azeotropes and the selectivity of the agents. The simulation was carried out on the Aspen Plus V.10.0 program environment. Two extractive distillation flosheets for the methanol - ethanol - acetonitrile - water separation are investigated. Both schemes include a two-column complex for the extractive distillation of the base mixture: in the first column, organic solvents are separated from water, and in the second column, the agent is regenerated. For subsequent separation of acetonitrile, extractive distillation with dimethyl sulfoxide or glycerol is also used. But separation of methanol-ethanol - entrainert zeotropic mixtures differs in the order of separation of components in schemes I and II. In scheme I, regeneration of the agent and further separation of the alcohol mixture is provided, in scheme II, methanol is first isolated, and then ethanol is separated from the agent. The optimized results for both schemes at columns pressures 30 and 101.32 kPa are performed. Different sets of selective agents introduced into extractive distillation columns are considered. The concept of an effective set of entrainers is introduced. The evaluation of the design alternatives need the assessment of energy demands. Total energy consumption for separation (reboiler duty) for the scheme II at 35-38% higher than values for scheme I. On the criterion of the minimum total energy consumption for the separation the scheme I was recommended: pressure columns 30 kPa, effective set of entrainers: glycerol for dehydration of the base mixture and dimethyl sulfoxide for acetonitrile isolation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document