Hyperechoic amniotic membranes in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes (p-PROM) and pregnancy outcome

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Volpe ◽  
Elvira di Pasquo ◽  
Alice Ferretti ◽  
Andrea Dall’Asta ◽  
Stefania Fieni ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesThe early identification of women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (p-PROM) who are at higher risk of imminent delivery remains challenging. The aim of our study was to evaluate if an increased echogenicity of the amniotic membranes may represent a sonographic marker of impending delivery in women with p-PROM.MethodsThis was a prospective study including women with singleton pregnancies and diagnosis of p-PROM between 22 and 37 gestational weeks. A sonographic examination was performed within 24 h from the hospital admission and the appearance of the amniotic membranes close to the internal os was specifically evaluated. The membranes were defined as hyperechoic when their echogenicity was similar to that of the fetal bones or normoechoic in the other cases. The primary aim of the study was to compare the admission to spontaneous onset of labor interval and the pregnancy outcome between the cases of p-PROM with and without hyperechoic membranes.ResultsOverall, 45 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria with similar characteristics at admission. In women with hyperechoic membranes, the admission to spontaneous onset of labor interval was significantly shorter (11.5 [5.3–25.0] vs. 3.0 [1.5–9.0] p=0.04) compared to women with normo-echoic membranes. At binomial logistic regression after adjustment for GA at hospital admission, the presence of hyperechoic membranes was found as the only independent predictor of spontaneous onset of labor ≤72 h (aOR: 6.1; 95% CI: 1.0–36.9)ConclusionsThe presence of hyperechoic membranes is associated with a 6-fold higher incidence of spontaneous onset of labor within 72 h independently from the gestational age at p-PROM.

2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 375-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dunja Tabs ◽  
Tihomir Vejnovic ◽  
Nebojsa Radunovic

Women conceiving by assisted reproduction are at higher risk for preterm and premature rupture of membranes. The aim of our study was to estimate and compare incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes in singleton pregnancies of women who conceived by intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization, from 1999 to 2003. We investigated 87 women from the intrauterine insemination, and 102 from the in vitro fertilization program. There were no statistically significant differences in regard to preterm and premature rupture of membranes: p>0.75 in two groups. The incidence of premature rupture of membranes was 2.30% (after intrauterine insemination) and 2.94% (after in vitro fertilization). There was no statistically significant differences in regard to preterm and premature rupture of membranes in women who conceived by insemination and in vitro fertilization. Estimated incidence of preterm and premature rupture of membranes was similar to the literature data and also similar to incidence after natural conception.


Author(s):  
Alberto Muniz Rodriguez ◽  
Andrew Pastor ◽  
Nathan S. Fox

Objective The aim of this study was to estimate if preterm premature rupture of membranes in women with cerclage is due to the cerclage itself or rather the underlying risk factors for preterm birth in this population. Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies who underwent Shirodkar cerclage by a single maternal–fetal medicine practice between 2005 and 2019. The control group was an equal number of randomly selected women with a singleton gestation who had a prior preterm birth and were treated with 17-OH-progesterone but no cerclage. Patients with major uterine anomalies or fetal anomalies were excluded. The primary outcome was preterm premature rupture of membranes prior to 34 weeks. Chi-square and logistic regression were used. Results A total of 350 women with cerclage (154 [44%] history-indicated, 137 [39%] ultrasound-indicated, and 59 [17%] exam-indicated) and 350 controls were included. Preterm premature rupture of membranes prior to 34 weeks did not differ between the groups (8.9% in cerclage vs. 6.0% in controls, p = 0.149, adjusted odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.24–1.64) nor between the different cerclage indications (9.1% of history-indicated, 7.3% of ultrasound-indicated, and 11.9% of exam-indicated, p = 0.582). This study had 80% power with an α error of 0.05 to detect an increase in preterm premature rupture of membranes prior to 34 weeks from 6.0% in the control group to 12.0% in the cerclage group. Conclusion Cerclage does not increase the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes prior to 34 weeks compared with other women at increased risk of preterm birth. The observed association between cerclage and preterm premature rupture of membranes is likely due to underlying risk factors and not the cerclage itself. The risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes prior to 34 weeks in women with cerclage is 10% or less and does not appear to differ based on cerclage indication. Key Points


2005 ◽  
Vol 193 (3) ◽  
pp. 1132-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Fuks ◽  
Lance A. Parton ◽  
Satya Polavarapu ◽  
Denise Netta ◽  
Sonya Strassberg ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1102-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Appiagyei ◽  
Megan Templin ◽  
Heather Mertz ◽  
Matthew Finneran

Objective To assess the impact on the duration of latency to delivery when a single oral dose of azithromycin is substituted for erythromycin in the standard antibiotic regimen used in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Study Design A retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM between 23 and 33 6/7 weeks of gestation from January 2012 to June 2016. Patients prior to June 2014 received a standard antibiotic regimen of 7 days of erythromycin and ampicillin/amoxicillin. After this period, patients received a single oral dose of azithromycin 1 g substituted for erythromycin in this regimen. Primary outcome was latency from PPROM to delivery. Results One hundred sixty-two women met the inclusion criteria, 84 in the erythromycin group and 78 in the azithromycin group. There was no difference in the median latency from PPROM to delivery between the groups (erythromycin: 6.37 days, interquartile range [IQR]: 3.59–10.93 vs. azithromycin: 5.86 days, IQR: 3.12–12.05, p = 0.75). There was a higher rate of cesarean delivery (48.8 vs. 29.5%, p = 0.01) and positive neonatal blood cultures (13.6 vs. 4.1%, p = 0.05) in the erythromycin group. Conclusion There is no difference in latency to delivery when a single oral dose of azithromycin 1 g is substituted for erythromycin in the standard antibiotic regimen used in singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM.


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 658-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Ehsanipoor ◽  
Neelu Arora ◽  
David C. Lagrew ◽  
Deborah A. Wing ◽  
Judith H. Chung

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document