Der anlagenexterne nukleare Notfallschutz ein Überblick / Off-site nuclear emergency management - an overview

Kerntechnik ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 128-135
Author(s):  
A. Bayer
Risk Analysis ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raimo P. Hamalainen ◽  
Mats R. K. Lindstedt ◽  
Kari Sinkko

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. S169-S174 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Perko ◽  
L. Benighaus ◽  
Y. Tomkiv ◽  
H.V. Wolf

Within the European project CONFIDENCE, an extensive research programme has been conducted on a range of different tools, including Apps, SMS, numerical, narrative or mixed news messages and videos linked to uncertainty communication following potential nuclear or radiological emergencies. For this purpose, qualitative and quantitative research methods were applied in different European countries. Based on the results of these studies, we have formulated guidelines for efficient and effective communication about uncertainties that can be used in nuclear or radiological emergencies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tudor B. Ionescu ◽  
Walter Scheuermann

AbstractWe present the architecture of the new ABR-KFUE decision-support system for nuclear emergency management used in Germany. Such systems assist decision makers in taking countermeasures in case of releases of radioactive materials into the environment. The specificity of these systems is that they use simulation software in a safety-critical application context. The new architecture of the system thus aims at fulfilling non-functional requirements for improved reliability, performance, availability, and maintainability. The proposed solutions are evaluated using a stimulus/response analysis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 2247-2260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyri Mustajoki ◽  
Raimo P. Hämäläinen ◽  
Kari Sinkko

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1302
Author(s):  
Tudor B. Ionescu

Grounded in a social scientific research approach, the present case study traces the shift in the German nuclear regulatory culture from prevention to preparedness, the latter of which builds upon decision support systems for nuclear emergency management. These systems integrate atmospheric dispersion models for tracing radioactive materials released accidentally from nuclear facilities. For atmospheric dispersion modelers and emergency managers, this article provides a critical historical perspective on the practical, epistemic, and organizational issues surrounding the use of decision support systems for nuclear emergency management. This perspective suggests that atmospheric dispersion models are embedded within an entire assemblage of institutions, technologies, and practices of preparedness, which are challenged by the uniqueness of each nuclear accident.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document