Phytotoxic and Photosynthetic Activities of Maduramicin and Maduramicin Methyl Ester

1999 ◽  
Vol 54 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 325-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Teresa Gutiérrez-Lugo ◽  
Blas Lotina-Hennsen ◽  
Amelia Farrés ◽  
Sergio Sánchez ◽  
Rachel Mata

Abstract The polyether antibiotic maduramicin and its methyl ester derivative inhibited photophos­ phorylation and proton uptake in isolated spinach chloroplasts. Both compounds also en­ hanced basal and phosphorylating electron transport and stimulated Mg2+-dependent AT­ Pase activity, therefore, they behave as uncouplers of photophosphorylation being the methyl ester derivative more potent than the parent compound. On the other hand, maduramicin inhibited germination and radicle elongation of several crop and weed species. In addition, the antibiotic caused phytotoxic injury and fresh weight reduction to 4-to-6 week old seed­ lings of two weed and two crop species when applied at 10-4 ᴍ by foliar application in the greenhouse.

1976 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1732-1734 ◽  
Author(s):  
B H Kroening ◽  
M Weintraub

Abstract Between-sample variation in tracer binding in the 125I-labeled digoxin radioimmunoassay was investigated with two tracers, 3-O-succinyl-digoxigenin-[125I]-labeled tyrosine and [125I]-labeled tyrosine-methyl-ester-digoxin. Digoxin-free serum samples having various concentrations of thyroxine were assayed with both tracers. The percentage of tracer bound when the samples were assayed with the first-mentioned tracer was increased significantly for the low thyroxine groups when compared to the normal (P less than 0.001) or the high thyroxine groups (P less than 0.05). Little difference existed when the latter tracer was used. There was variation in tracer binding when serum from dogs dosed with thyrotropin was assayed with the first tracer, but there was little variation with the second. Tracer binding may be influenced by thyroxine-binding proteins. Variation in tracer binding appears to be reduced when [125I]-labeled tyrosine-methyl-ester-digoxin is used.


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Ramesh ◽  
N. Srinivasa Reddy ◽  
T. Prabakar Rao ◽  
J. Venkateswara Rao ◽  
Y. Venkateswarlu

1993 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
K R Reuhl ◽  
M Vapiwala ◽  
M T Ryzlak ◽  
C P Schaffner

2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 2206-2210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Hui Chao ◽  
An-Bang Wu ◽  
Chia-Jung Lee ◽  
Fu-An Chen ◽  
Ching-Chiung Wang

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 554-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Andreasen ◽  
Leif Hansen ◽  
Jens C. Streibig

Under greenhouse conditions, annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.), common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris L.), shepherd's purse [Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medicus], small nettle (Urtica urens L.), canola (Brassica napus L. ssp. napus), and pea (Pisum sativa L.) differed in sensitivity to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Of the weed species, annual bluegrass was the least sensitive; whereas, among the crop species, canola was about sevenfold more sensitive than was pea. The sensitivity of a species to UV radiation was highly dependent upon its stage of development. The study indicates some potential for using UV radiation to control weeds, but the method needs further investigation to unravel the selectivity of the methods and potential health hazards.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document