Effects of High Intensity / Low Volume and Low Intensity / High Volume Isokinetic Resistance Exercise on Postexercise Glucose Tolerance

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 330
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Miller ◽  
Brent C. Ruby ◽  
James J. Laskin ◽  
Steven E. Gaskill
2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (10) ◽  
pp. 1889-1897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke J. Connolly ◽  
Nikolai B. Nordsborg ◽  
Michael Nyberg ◽  
Pál Weihe ◽  
Peter Krustrup ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S166
Author(s):  
Todd A. Crowder ◽  
Mark A. Rice ◽  
Nancy C. Jensen

Retos ◽  
2016 ◽  
pp. 180-183
Author(s):  
Roberto Andrés González-Fimbres ◽  
Héctor Griego Amaya ◽  
Claudia Selene Cuevas-Castro ◽  
Germán Hernández Cruz

Cuantificar los componentes de volumen e intensidad de la carga de entrenamiento es importante para garantizar la mejora del rendimiento. El objetivo de este estudio fue el comparar los efectos del volumen y la intensidad de la carga de entrenamiento sobre la Frecuencia Cardiaca de Recuperación (FCR). Dos mujeres y cuatro hombres, (edad M: 21 ± 1.41, H: 25.75 ± 4.57 años) entrenados en deportes de resistencia llevaron a cabo dos tratamientos con la misma carga interna (TRIMP = 52 unidades arbitrarias) pero con variación en volumen e intensidad (T1 = intensidad alta y volumen bajo [86-91% FCres, 14.5 min, T2 = intensidad baja y volumen alto [72-78% FCres, 30.5 min]). Posterior al ejercicio se monitoreó la FCR en cinco momentos: al finalizar el esfuerzo (R1), 10 (R2), 20 (R3), 30 (R4) y 40 (R5) minutos después del esfuerzo. Se encontraron diferencias significativas (p ≤ .05) entre los valores de FCR en los cinco momentos. Los resultados sugieren que tratamientos de la misma carga interna existen diferencias entre la carga interna de los tratamientos, observando que la intensidad afecta de mayor manera a la FCR que el volumen. Abstract. Quantifing the effects of volume and intensity components of training load (TL) is essential in order to guarantee performance enhancement. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of training load volume and intensity on Heart Rate Recovery (HRR). Two women (age = 21 ± 1.41) and four men (age = 25.75 ± 4.57 years) trained in endurance sports performed two different treatments with equal TL (TRIMP = 52 arbitrary units) but different volume and intensity (Training 1 = high intensity, low volume [86-91% HRres, 14.5 min], Training 2 = low intensity, high volume [72-78% HRres, 30.5 min]). HRR was monitored after exercise in five moments: at the end of training (R1), and 10 (R2), 20 (R3), 30 (R4), and 40 (R5) minutes after effort. Significant differences were found in HRR values at each of the five intervals (p ≤ .05). Results suggest the existence of significant differences in TL between the two treatments. Outcomes also evidenced that intensity has a greater effect than volume on HRR.


2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna B. Gillen ◽  
Martin J. Gibala

Growing research suggests that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a time-efficient exercise strategy to improve cardiorespiratory and metabolic health. “All out” HIIT models such as Wingate-type exercise are particularly effective, but this type of training may not be safe, tolerable or practical for many individuals. Recent studies, however, have revealed the potential for other models of HIIT, which may be more feasible but are still time-efficient, to stimulate adaptations similar to more demanding low-volume HIIT models and high-volume endurance-type training. As little as 3 HIIT sessions per week, involving ≤10 min of intense exercise within a time commitment of ≤30 min per session, including warm-up, recovery between intervals and cool down, has been shown to improve aerobic capacity, skeletal muscle oxidative capacity, exercise tolerance and markers of disease risk after only a few weeks in both healthy individuals and people with cardiometabolic disorders. Additional research is warranted, as studies conducted have been relatively short-term, with a limited number of measurements performed on small groups of subjects. However, given that “lack of time” remains one of the most commonly cited barriers to regular exercise participation, low-volume HIIT is a time-efficient exercise strategy that warrants consideration by health practitioners and fitness professionals.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. e8
Author(s):  
Pedro Fatela ◽  
Joana F. Reis ◽  
Goncalo V. Mendonca ◽  
Toma´ s Freitas ◽  
Maria J. Valamatos ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (9) ◽  
pp. 1663-1670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam M. Gonzalez ◽  
Jay R. Hoffman ◽  
Jeremy R. Townsend ◽  
Adam R. Jajtner ◽  
Carleigh H. Boone ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 393-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Wells ◽  
Jay R. Hoffman ◽  
Adam R. Jajtner ◽  
Alyssa N. Varanoske ◽  
David D. Church ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. S199
Author(s):  
K Goto ◽  
S Nagasawa ◽  
O Yanagisawa ◽  
F Kaneko ◽  
T Kizuka ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Tiberiu Puta ◽  
Alexandra Mihaela Stănilă ◽  
Remus Datcu

AbstractIntroduction: The blood flow restriction method is a training method that is based on the partial occlusion of circulation during a workout. This technique combines low-intensity exercise with the occlusion of the bloodstream which produces results similar to high-intensity training.Aim: We aimed to identify the areas in which this method is applicable, its potential benefits and effects, recommendations regarding the rules of use for maximal effects (dosage, intensity, etc.), and also possible contraindications or warnings regarding the use of this method.Methods: We have analyzed a number of 20 articles on this topic from the field literature of the last 10 years, using ”google academic” as a search engine.Results: After this study we concluded that blood flow restriction is a method with wide applicability in the field of sports training, but also in the recovery process; however, it requires attention in choosing the necessary equipment. For healthy individuals, best training adaptations occur when combining low-load blood flow restriction resistance exercise with traditional high-load resistance exercise.Conclusion: Low-intensity resistance exercise with blood flow restriction is as effective as high-intensity training (for strength and muscle mass gains), but only the high-intensity protocol promotes significant hypotensive responses after exercise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document