scholarly journals Condomless Group Sex Is Associated With HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Knowledge and Interest Uptake: A Cross-Sectional Study of Gay and Bisexual Men in Paris, France

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denton Callander ◽  
Su Hyun Park ◽  
Yazan A. Al-Ajlouni ◽  
John A. Schneider ◽  
Maria R. Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Gay And Bisexual Men ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Recent Experience ◽  
Bisexual Men ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
And Bisexual ◽  
Group Sex ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis

As a prevention strategy, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may benefit men who participate in group sex, but little is known about PrEP among this group internationally and virtually nothing is known of the European context. This study used an online survey of gay men living in Paris, France to assess associations between group sex and awareness of, use and interest in PrEP in its once-daily, episodic, injectable, and microbicidal forms. Men reporting recent (within 3 months) condomless group sex were much more likely to report once-daily PrEP use than men with no group sex experience (41.5% vs 7.7%, p < .001). Uptake was similarly low among men who had group sex with condoms (8.0%) and those with less-recent experience (6.43%). Overall, willingness to use PrEP—including its non-daily forms—was high among men reporting group sex, suggesting opportunities for outreach and implementation.

scholarly journals P517 Do sexual practices differ by age among gay and bisexual men? A cross-sectional study in melbourne, australia

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Kilner ◽  
Christopher Fairley ◽  
Sam Burrell ◽  
Catriona Bradshaw ◽  
Marcus Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gay And Bisexual Men ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sexual Practices ◽  
Bisexual Men ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
And Bisexual

Awareness and knowledge of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among Australian gay and bisexual men: results of a national, online survey

Sexual Health ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Holt ◽  
Toby Lea ◽  
Susan Kippax ◽  
Johann Kolstee ◽  
Jeanne Ellard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Gay And Bisexual Men ◽  
Capital City ◽  
Hiv Positive ◽  
Post Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
Bisexual Men ◽  
Post Exposure ◽  
And Bisexual ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
University Degree

Background Expanded access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is being actively debated in Australia. Awareness and knowledge of this HIV-prevention method have not been assessed in detail in the primary affected population, gay and bisexual men. Methods: Awareness and knowledge of PrEP were assessed among Australian gay and bisexual men, who were asked to complete a national, anonymous, online survey in 2015. Associations with PrEP awareness were identified with multivariate logistic regression and associations with PrEP knowledge were identified using multivariate linear regression. Results: Among 1251 participants, 954 (77%) were aware of PrEP. The most common sources of information were gay community media, Australian websites and friends. Awareness of PrEP was independently associated with older age, living in a capital city, having a university degree, being tested for HIV, being HIV-positive, having condomless anal intercourse with regular male partners, and ever having taken post-exposure prophylaxis. Men in monogamous relationships were less likely to be aware of PrEP. Among men who were aware of PrEP, the mean PrEP knowledge score was 6.8 out of 13. Relatively few participants knew that taking PrEP involved regular clinical monitoring and that in Australia PrEP was only recommended for people at risk of HIV. Better knowledge was independently associated with living in a capital city, having a university degree, being in full-time employment, being HIV-positive, and ever having taken post-exposure prophylaxis or PrEP. Conclusions: To assist in appropriate PrEP uptake, we recommend educating gay and bisexual men about current Australian prescribing guidelines and how PrEP is accessed in Australia.

scholarly journals Kissing may be an important and neglected risk factor for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea: a cross-sectional study in men who have sex with men

2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 516-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric P F Chow ◽  
Vincent J Cornelisse ◽  
Deborah A Williamson ◽  
David Priest ◽  
Jane S Hocking ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Centre ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Gay And Bisexual Men ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Bisexual Men ◽  
Sex Partners ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
And Bisexual ◽  
Sex With Men

ObjectivesA mathematical model suggested that a significant proportion of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea cases are acquired via oropharynx-to-oropharynx transmission (ie, tongue-kissing), but to date, no empirical study has investigated this. This study aimed to examine the association between kissing and oropharyngeal gonorrhoea among gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (MSM).MethodsMSM attending a public sexual health centre in Melbourne, Australia, between March 2016 and February 2017 were invited to participate in a brief survey that collected data on their number of male partners in the last 3 months, in three distinct categories: kissing-only (ie, no sex including no oral and/or anal sex), sex-only (ie, any sex without kissing), and kissing-with-sex (ie, kissing with any sex). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations between oropharyngeal gonorrhoea positivity by nucleic acid amplification tests and the three distinct partner categories.ResultsA total of 3677 men completed the survey and were tested for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea. Their median age was 30 (IQR 25–37) and 6.2% (n=229) had oropharyngeal gonorrhoea. Men had a mean number of 4.3 kissing-only, 1.4 sex-only, and 5.0 kissing-with-sex partners in the last 3 months. Kissing-only and kissing-with-sex were associated with oropharyngeal gonorrhoea, but sex-only was not. The adjusted odds for having oropharyngeal gonorrhoea were 1.46-fold (95% CI 1.04 to 2.06) for men with ≥4 kissing-only partners and 1.81-fold (95% CI 1.17 to 2.79) for men with ≥4 kissing-with-sex partners.ConclusionsThese data suggest that kissing may be associated with transmission of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea in MSM, irrespective of whether sex also occurs.

scholarly journals Exploring the role of sex-seeking apps and websites in the social and sexual lives of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: a cross-sectional study

Sexual Health ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiffer G. Card ◽  
Nathan J. Lachowsky ◽  
Zishan Cui ◽  
Susan Shurgold ◽  
Maya Gislason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensation Seeking ◽  
Gay And Bisexual Men ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Bisexual Men ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Social Interventions ◽  
Gay Community ◽  
Social Time ◽  
And Bisexual ◽  
Sex With Men

Background The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between online sex-seeking, community/social attachment and sexual behaviour. Methods: Respondent-driven sampling was used to recruit 774 sexually active gay and bisexual men in Vancouver, Canada, aged ≥16 years. Multivariable logistic regression compared men who had used online sex-seeking apps/websites in the past 6 months (n = 586) with those who did not (n = 188). Results: Multivariable results showed that online sex seekers were more likely to be younger [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.95, 95% CI: (0.93–0.96)], college educated [aOR = 1.60, 95% CI: (1.07, 2.40)], have more Facebook friends [aOR = 1.07, 95% CI: (1.01, 1.13)], spend more social time with other gay men [aOR = 1.99, 95% CI: (1.33–2.97)], and were less likely to identify emotionally with the gay community [aOR = 0.93, 95% CI: (0.86–1.00)]. Further, they had displayed high sensation-seeking behaviour [aOR = 1.08, 95% CI: (1.03–1.13)], were more likely to engage in serodiscordant/unknown condomless anal sex [aOR = 2.34, 95% CI: (1.50–3.66)], use strategic positioning [aOR = 1.72, 95% CI: (1.08–2.74)], ask their partner’s HIV-status prior to sex [aOR = 2.06, 95% CI: (1.27–3.37)], and have ever been tested for HIV [aOR = 4.11, 95% CI: (2.04–8.29)]. Conclusion: These findings highlight the online and offline social behaviour exhibited by gay and bisexual men, pressing the need for pro-social interventions to promote safe-sex norms online. We conclude that both Internet and community-based prevention will help reach app/web users.

scholarly journals Experiences of homophobia among gay and bisexual men: results from a cross-sectional study in seven countries

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1174-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna N. Chard ◽  
Catherine Finneran ◽  
Patrick S. Sullivan ◽  
Rob Stephenson
Keyword(s):  
Gay And Bisexual Men ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Bisexual Men ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
And Bisexual
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document