scholarly journals Are Improvements in Cognitive Content and Depressive Symptoms Correlates or Mediators during Acute-Phase Cognitive Therapy for Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder?

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Vittengl ◽  
Lee Anna Clark ◽  
Michael E. Thase ◽  
Robin B. Jarrett
2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (15) ◽  
pp. 3191-3204 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Vittengl ◽  
L. A. Clark ◽  
M. E. Thase ◽  
R. B. Jarrett

Background.The cognitive model of depression suggests that cognitive therapy (CT) improves major depressive disorder (MDD) in part by changing depressive cognitive content (e.g. dysfunctional attitudes, hopelessness). The current analyses clarified: (1) the durability of improvements in cognitive content made by acute-phase CT responders; (2) whether continuation-phase CT (C-CT) or fluoxetine (FLX) further improves cognitive content; and (3) the extent to which cognitive content mediates continuation treatments’ effects on depressive symptoms and major depressive relapse/recurrence.Method.Out-patients with recurrent MDD who responded to acute-phase CT (n = 241) were randomized to 8 months of C-CT, FLX or pill placebo (PBO) and followed for an 24 additional months. Cognitive content was assessed approximately every 4 months using five standard patient-report measures.Results.Large improvements in cognitive content made during acute-phase CT were maintained for 32 months, with 78–90% of patients scoring in normal ranges, on average. Cognitive content varied little between C-CT, FLX and PBO arms, overall. Small, transient improvements in cognitive content in C-CT or FLX compared with PBO patients did not clearly mediate the treatments’ effects on depressive symptoms or on major depressive relapse/recurrence.Conclusions.Outpatients with recurrent MDD who respond to acute-phase CT show durable improvements in cognitive content. C-CT or FLX may not continue to improve patient-reported cognitive content substantively, and thus may treat recurrent MDD by other paths.


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 778-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Trombello ◽  
Jeffrey R. Vittengl ◽  
Wayne H. Denton ◽  
Abu Minhajuddin ◽  
Michael E. Thase ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 221-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin B. Jarrett ◽  
Abu Minhajuddin ◽  
Julie L. Kangas ◽  
Edward S. Friedman ◽  
Judith A. Callan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Takuya Oka ◽  
Jun Watanabe ◽  
Yasushi Tsujimoto

We read the article by Ninomiya et al. with great interest and appreciate the author's efforts to analyze the effect of primary mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) in patients with anxiety disorder in secondary-care settings, compared with a waiting-list group. However, we have concerns about baseline imbalance of depressive symptoms that may influence the conclusion of the trial. Comorbid major depressive disorder can have caused an underestimation of anxiety symptoms in the waiting-list group and distort effectiveness of MBCT. The wait-list group had more severe depressive symptoms than the intervention group, about 7 points more in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) scores, and that group might have more major depressive disorder. Indeed, the rate of antidepressant use in the wait-list group was 25% higher than the intervention group. It is well known that major depressive disorder is associated with cognitive errors and underestimation of self-report outcomes. Baseline imbalance of depressive symptoms may therefore weaken the conclusion of the study, because all outcome measures were self-report questionnaires. The authors should acknowledge the limitation and provide information about the diagnosis of major depressive disorder.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne C. van Bronswijk ◽  
Lotte H.J.M. Lemmens ◽  
John R. Keefe ◽  
Marcus J.H. Huibers ◽  
Robert J. DeRubeis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document