Accounting for Depressive Realism in Contingency Judgments: Attentional Processing Differences

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-201
Author(s):  
Shannon Hyder ◽  
Ross M. King
Keyword(s):  
Attentional Processing ◽  
Depressive Realism ◽  
Processing Differences ◽  
Contingency Judgments

scholarly journals Depressive Realism and Outcome Density Bias in Contingency Judgments: The Effect of the Context and Intertrial Interval.

2005 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel M. Msetfi ◽  
Robin A. Murphy ◽  
Jane Simpson ◽  
Diana E. Kornbrot
Keyword(s):  
Intertrial Interval ◽  
Depressive Realism ◽  
Outcome Density ◽  
Contingency Judgments

Depressive Symptoms Account for Loss of Positive Attention Bias in ADHD Patients: An Eye-Tracking Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 108705472110636
Author(s):  
Cassandra C. Schuthof ◽  
Indira Tendolkar ◽  
Maria Annemiek Bergman ◽  
Margit Klok ◽  
Rose M. Collard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Attention Bias ◽  
Attention Allocation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Comorbid Depression ◽  
Emotional Information ◽  
Attentional Processing ◽  
Emotional Faces ◽  
Processing Differences

Objectives: Depression and ADHD often co-occur and are both characterized by altered attentional processing. Differences and overlap in the profile of attention to emotional information may help explain the co-occurence. We examined negative attention bias in ADHD as neurocognitive marker for comorbid depression. Methods: Patients with depression ( n = 63), ADHD ( n = 43), ADHD and depression ( n = 25), and non-psychiatric controls ( n = 68) were compared on attention allocation toward emotional faces. The following eye-tracking indices were used: gaze duration, number of revisits, and location and duration of first fixation. Results: Controls revisited the happy faces more than the other facial expressions. Both the depression and the comorbid group showed significantly less revisits of the happy faces compared to the ADHD and the control group. Interestingly, after controlling for depressive symptoms, the groups no longer differed on the number of revisits. Conclusion: ADHD patients show a relative positive attention bias, while negative attention bias in ADHD likely indicates (sub)clinical comorbid depression.

Instruction Using Augmentative and Alternative Communication Supports: Description of Current Practices by Speech-Language Pathologists Who Work With Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 586-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaitlyn A. Clarke ◽  
Diane L. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Autism Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Communication Systems ◽  
Diagnostic Category ◽  
Children With Autism ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
Processing Differences

Purpose The aim of this research study was to examine common practices of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who work with children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with respect to whether or not SLPs consider processing differences in ASD or the effects of input during their instruction. Method Following a qualitative research method, how SLPs instruct and present augmentative and alternative communication systems to individuals with ASD, their rationale for method selection, and their perception of the efficacy of selected interventions were probed. Semistructured interviews were conducted as part of an in-depth case report with content analysis. Results Based on completed interviews, 4 primary themes were identified: (a) instructional method , (b) input provided , (c) decision-making process , and (d) perceived efficacy of treatment . Additionally, one secondary theme, training and education received , was identified . Conclusions Clinicians reported making decisions based on the needs of the child; however, they also reported making decisions based on the diagnostic category that characterized the child (i.e., ASD). The use of modeling when teaching augmentative and alternative communication to individuals with ASD emerged as a theme, but variations in the method of modeling were noted. SLPs did not report regularly considering processing differences in ASD, nor did they consider the effects of input during instruction.

Probing the puzzling workings 'depressive realism*

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Adelson
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Realism

Eye Movements Reveal Processing Differences Between Modal Verbs Should and Must

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Huette ◽  
Teenie Matlock ◽  
Michael Spivey
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Modal Verbs ◽  
Processing Differences

The influence of natural and urban environments on attentional processing of emotional stimuli

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chrono Nu ◽  
Katie Mullin ◽  
Hailey Edwards ◽  
Kailey Kornhauser ◽  
Russell Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urban Environments ◽  
Emotional Stimuli ◽  
Attentional Processing

Information Processing Differences Among Variants of Psychopathy

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Clark ◽  
Jennifer Skeem
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Processing Differences

Learning Effects and Cell Information Use In Contingency Judgments

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irwin P. Levin ◽  
Shu-Fang Kao ◽  
Edward A. Wasserman
Keyword(s):  
Information Use ◽  
Learning Effects ◽  
Contingency Judgments

Contingency judgments are conditionalized on the constancy of other causes

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobbie Spellman
Keyword(s):  
Contingency Judgments
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document