scholarly journals A representational similarity analysis of cognitive control during color-word Stroop

2021 ◽  
pp. JN-RM-2956-20
Author(s):  
Michael C. Freund ◽  
Julie M. Bugg ◽  
Todd S. Braver
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Freund ◽  
Julie M. Bugg ◽  
Todd S. Braver

AbstractProgress in understanding the neural bases of cognitive control has been supported by the paradigmatic color-word Stroop task, in which a target response (color name) must be selected over a more automatic, yet potentially incongruent, distractor response (word). From this platform, models of control have postulated complementary coding schemes: dorsomedial frontal cortex (DMFC) is proposed to evaluate control demand via incongruency-related coding, whereas dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is proposed to implement control via goal and target-related coding. But, mapping these theorized schemes to measured neural activity within this task has been challenging. Here, we tested for these coding schemes relatively directly, by decomposing an event-related color-word Stroop task via representational similarity analysis (RSA). Three coding models were fit to the similarity structure of multi-voxel patterns of fMRI activity, acquired from 66 healthy, young-adult male and female humans. Incongruency coding was predominant in DMFC, whereas both target and incongruency coding were present with indistinguishable strength in DLPFC. Distractor coding, in contrast, was not detected within any frontoparietal region, but was instead strongly encoded within early visual cortex. Further, these coding schemes were differentially related to behavior: individuals with stronger DLPFC (and lateral posterior parietal cortex) target coding, but weaker DMFC incongruency coding, exhibited less behavioral Stroop interference. These results highlight the utility of the RSA framework for investigating neural mechanisms of cognitive control and point to several promising directions to extend the Stroop paradigm.Significance StatementHow the human brain enables cognitive control — the ability to override behavioral habits to pursue internal goals — has been a major focus of neuroscience research. This ability has been frequently investigated by using the Stroop color-word naming task. With the Stroop as a test-bed, many theories have proposed specific neuroanatomical dissociations, in which medial and lateral frontal brain regions underlie cognitive control by encoding distinct types of information. Yet providing a direct confirmation of these claims has been challenging. Here, we demonstrate that representational similarity analysis (RSA), which estimates and models the similarity structure of brain activity patterns, can successfully establish the hypothesized functional dissociations within the Stroop task. RSA may provide a useful approach for investigating cognitive control mechanisms.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Crawley Freund ◽  
Joset A. Etzel ◽  
Todd Samuel Braver

Cognitive control relies on distributed and potentially high-dimensional frontoparietal task representations. Yet the classical cognitive neuroscience approach in this domain has focused on aggregating and contrasting neural measures — either via univariate or multivariate classification methods — along highly abstracted, one-dimensional factors (e.g., Stroop congruency). Here, we argue for representational similarity analysis (RSA) as a more suitable alternative approach, which is better aligned to evaluate current, representational theories of control. We highlight several exemplary uses of RSA in this regard. We further show that most classical paradigms, given their factorial structure, can be optimized for RSA with minimal modification. Our aim is to illustrate how RSA can be incorporated into cognitive control investigation to shed new light on old questions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 571
Author(s):  
Ming Bo Cai ◽  
Nicolas Schuck ◽  
Michael Anderson ◽  
Jonathan Pillow ◽  
Yael Niv

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Wang ◽  
Edward Wlotko ◽  
Edward Alexander ◽  
Lotte Schoot ◽  
Minjae Kim ◽  
...  

AbstractIt has been proposed that people can generate probabilistic predictions at multiple levels of representation during language comprehension. We used Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and Electroencephalography (EEG), in combination with Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA), to seek neural evidence for the prediction of animacy features. In two studies, MEG and EEG activity was measured as human participants (both sexes) read three-sentence scenarios. Verbs in the final sentences constrained for either animate or inanimate semantic features of upcoming nouns, and the broader discourse context constrained for either a specific noun or for multiple nouns belonging to the same animacy category. We quantified the similarity between spatial patterns of brain activity following the verbs until just before the presentation of the nouns. The MEG and EEG datasets revealed converging evidence that the similarity between spatial patterns of neural activity following animate constraining verbs was greater than following inanimate constraining verbs. This effect could not be explained by lexical-semantic processing of the verbs themselves. We therefore suggest that it reflected the inherent difference in the semantic similarity structure of the predicted animate and inanimate nouns. Moreover, the effect was present regardless of whether a specific word could be predicted, providing strong evidence for the prediction of coarse-grained semantic features that goes beyond the prediction of individual words.Significance statementLanguage inputs unfold very quickly during real-time communication. By predicting ahead we can give our brains a “head-start”, so that language comprehension is faster and more efficient. While most contexts do not constrain strongly for a specific word, they do allow us to predict some upcoming information. For example, following the context, “they cautioned the…”, we can predict that the next word will be animate rather than inanimate (we can caution a person, but not an object). Here we used EEG and MEG techniques to show that the brain is able to use these contextual constraints to predict the animacy of upcoming words during sentence comprehension, and that these predictions are associated with specific spatial patterns of neural activity.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e0135697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blair Kaneshiro ◽  
Marcos Perreau Guimaraes ◽  
Hyung-Suk Kim ◽  
Anthony M. Norcia ◽  
Patrick Suppes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document