scholarly journals Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 2424-2433 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Aron
2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Eagle ◽  
C. Baunez ◽  
D. M. Hutcheson ◽  
O. Lehmann ◽  
A. P. Shah ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1775-1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Dambacher ◽  
Alexander T. Sack ◽  
Jill Lobbestael ◽  
Arnoud Arntz ◽  
Suzanne Brugman ◽  
...  

The ability of inhibiting impulsive urges is paramount for human behavior. Such successful response inhibition has consistently been associated with activity in pFC. The current study aims to unravel the differential involvement of different areas within right pFC for successful action restraint versus action cancellation. These two conceptually different aspects of action inhibition were measured with a go/no-go task (action restraint) and a stop signal task (action cancellation). Localization of relevant prefrontal activation was based on fMRI data. Significant task-related activation during successful action restraint was localized for each participant individually in right anterior insula (rAI), right superior frontal gyrus, and pre-SMA. Activation during successful action cancellation was localized in rAI, right middle frontal gyrus, and pre-SMA. Subsequently, fMRI-guided continuous thetaburst stimulation was applied to these regions. Results showed that the disruption of neural activity in rAI reduced both the ability to restrain (go/no-go) and cancel (stop signal) responses. In contrast, continuous thetaburst stimulation-induced disruption of the right superior frontal gyrus specifically impaired the ability to restrain from responding (go/no-go), while leaving the ability for action cancellation largely intact. Stimulation applied to right middle frontal gyrus and pre-SMA did not affect inhibitory processing in neither of the two tasks. These findings provide a more comprehensive perspective on the role of pFC in inhibition and cognitive control. The results emphasize the role of inferior frontal regions for global inhibition, whereas superior frontal regions seem to be specifically relevant for successful action restraint.


NeuroImage ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola J. Ray ◽  
John-Stuart Brittain ◽  
Peter Holland ◽  
Raed A. Joundi ◽  
John F. Stein ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S180
Author(s):  
NC Swann ◽  
N Tandon ◽  
RT Canolty ◽  
TM Ellmore ◽  
LK McEvoy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document