X-ray and electron microscopic determination of Debye characteristic temperature, stacking fault energy and other microstructural parameters in zinc telluride films

1990 ◽  
Vol 193 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 33-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Pal ◽  
S. Saha ◽  
B. K. Samantaray ◽  
A. K. Chaudhuri ◽  
H. D. Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Characteristic Temperature ◽  
Zinc Telluride ◽  
Stacking Fault ◽  
Stacking Fault Energy ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Debye Characteristic Temperature ◽  
Microstructural Parameters

On effects of non-systematic reflections on weak-beam images of partial dislocations

1991 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 688-689
Author(s):  
K. Z. Botros ◽  
S. S. Sheinin
Keyword(s):  
High Precision ◽  
Stacking Fault ◽  
Important Application ◽  
Stacking Fault Energy ◽  
Sharp Peak ◽  
Weak Beam ◽  
Partial Dislocations ◽  
Deviation Parameter ◽  
Beam Diffraction

The main features of weak beam images of dislocations were first described by Cockayne et al. using calculations of intensity profiles based on the kinematical and two beam dynamical theories. The feature of weak beam images which is of particular interest in this investigation is that intensity profiles exhibit a sharp peak located at a position very close to the position of the dislocation in the crystal. This property of weak beam images of dislocations has an important application in the determination of stacking fault energy of crystals. This can easily be done since the separation of the partial dislocations bounding a stacking fault ribbon can be measured with high precision, assuming of course that the weak beam relationship between the positions of the image and the dislocation is valid. In order to carry out measurements such as these in practice the specimen must be tilted to "good" weak beam diffraction conditions, which implies utilizing high values of the deviation parameter Sg.

Polarity Determination in Sphalerite and Wurtzite Structures

1990 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 500-501
Author(s):  
Stuart McKernan ◽  
C. Barry Carter
Keyword(s):  
Opposite Polarity ◽  
Single Domain ◽  
Polar Material ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Dynamical Interaction ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Polarity Determination ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Microscopic Techniques

The determination of the absolute polarity of a polar material is often crucial to the understanding of the defects which occur in such materials. Several methods exist by which this determination may be performed. In bulk, single-domain specimens, macroscopic techniques may be used, such as the different etching behavior, using the appropriate etchant, of surfaces with opposite polarity. X-ray measurements under conditions where Friedel’s law (which means that the intensity of reflections from planes of opposite polarity are indistinguishable) breaks down can also be used to determine the absolute polarity of bulk, single-domain specimens. On the microscopic scale, and particularly where antiphase boundaries (APBs), which separate regions of opposite polarity exist, electron microscopic techniques must be employed. Two techniques are commonly practised; the first [1], involves the dynamical interaction of hoLz lines which interfere constructively or destructively with the zero order reflection, depending on the crystal polarity. The crystal polarity can therefore be directly deduced from the relative intensity of these interactions.

scholarly journals On the determination of the stacking fault energy from extended nodes in Cu2NiZn

1980 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1125-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. L. Wegen ◽  
P. M. Bronsveld ◽  
J. Th. M. Hosson
Keyword(s):  
Stacking Fault ◽  
Stacking Fault Energy

On the determination of stacking fault energy in epitaxial f.c.c. films

1972 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 765-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Kramer ◽  
J. A. Venables
Keyword(s):  
Stacking Fault ◽  
Stacking Fault Energy

scholarly journals The Determination of Stacking Fault Energy by the Tetrahedron Method

1968 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 941 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Humble ◽  
CT Forwood
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Stacking Fault ◽  
Stacking Fault Energy ◽  
The Other ◽  
Dislocation Loops ◽  
The Third ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Length Measurements ◽  
Incomplete Theory

At present there are three methods for obtaining values of the stacking fault energy y of face-centred cubic (f.c.c.) materials by direct observation of dislocationstacking fault configurations in the electron microscope. These are based on measurements of extended three-fold dislocation nodes (e.g. Whelan 1958; Brown and ThOlen 1964), faulted dipole configurations (e.g. Haussermann and Wilkens 1966; Steeds 1967), and triangular Frank dislocation loops and stacking fault tetrahedral (e.g. Silcox and Hirsch 1959; Loretto, Clarebrough, and Segall 1965). The main advantages of the third method over the other two are that it is applicable to materials of a very wide range of stacking fault energy and involves only simple length measurements of defects that are easily recognized. However, it has suffered from the disadvantage that the values of y deduced from these measurements relied on an incomplete theory. The present authors have reconsidered this problem and, subject to the limitations of isotropic linear elasticity, have taken into account the major variables that may affect the values of y. It is the purpose of this note to present the results of this theory in a form in which values of y may easily be obtained from measurements of Frank dislocation loops and stacking fault tetrahedral without the resources of a large digital computer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document