D2. Human Rights Watch, Statement on Error in Its 22 November 2006 Press Release on the Gaza Strip, New York, 19 December 2006

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-200
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Gaza Strip ◽  
Press Release ◽  
The Gaza Strip

D3. Human Rights Watch, ““Razing Gaza: Mass Home Demolitions in the Gaza Strip,”” New York, 19 October 2004 (excerpts)

2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-214
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Gaza Strip ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Security Personnel ◽  
Complete Report ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Gaza Strip ◽  
Foreign Ministry

This 135-page report, which focuses primarily on home demolitions in Rafah, was compiled by a team of three researchers who spent a total of one month in the Gaza Strip, Egypt, and Israel interviewing more than 89 individuals, including Rafah residents, PA security personnel, municipal officials, representatives of local and international human rights groups in Gaza and Israel, IDF officers, Israeli Foreign Ministry officials, military specialists, and journalists. The following is excerpted from the summary of the report. Footnotes have been omitted for space considerations. The complete report is available at www.hrw.org.

scholarly journals Living under siege: resilience, hopelessness, and psychological distress among Palestinian students in the Gaza Strip

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Veronese ◽  
Alessandro Pepe ◽  
Marwan Diab ◽  
Yasser Abu Jamey ◽  
Ashraf Kagee
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Gaza Strip ◽  
Mental Symptoms ◽  
The Gaza Strip ◽  
Anxiety Depression ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Moving from an approach oriented to adaptation and functioning, the current paper explored the network of cumulative associations between the effects of the siege and resilience on mental health. Methods We sought to explore the impact of the siege on psychological distress (anxiety, depression, and stress) and the moderating effect of resilience and hopelessness in a sample of 550 Palestinian university students. We hypothesized that the siege effect would impact psychological distress so that the more people were affected by the siege, the more mental symptoms of common mental disorders they would report. We also expected that the siege would negatively impact both resilience and participants' hopelessness. Results Findings showed that higher scores on the scale measuring effect of the siege were associated with hopelessness. Furthermore, living under siege compromised participants’ resilience. The more the siege affected individuals, the lower resilience were protecting participants mental health and the more hopelessness was exposing them to anxiety, stress, and depression. Conclusion Our findings draw attention to how the ongoing violation of human rights influences people's mental health in Gaza. Implications for clinicians and policymakers are discussed.

Disengagement from the Gaza Strip and Post-Occupation Duties

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 528-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Prime Minister ◽  
Gaza Strip ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Humanitarian Law ◽  
Human Rights Organizations ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Gaza Strip ◽  
Israeli Occupation

Israel's disengagement from the Gaza Strip has created a situation in which this territory is dependent on the supply of various necessities by Israel, in particular the supply of electricity, In 2008 Israel decided to withhold 5% of the supply of electricity to the Gaza Strip, prompting several Gaza residents as well as human rights organizations to petition the Supreme Court of Israel against this decision. In Jaber Al-Bassiouni Ahmed v. The Prime Minister the Court assumed that the Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip had ended with the disengagement and treated this issue on the basis of general humanitarian law. The basic questions of whether the occupation had ended, and whether certain duties remained with Israel, even assuming that Gaza is no longer occupied, have not been explored. This Article addresses these two questions.It is the conclusion of this Article that regardless of the terms imposed by Israel after disengagement and other reservations that have been raised in this regard, occupation ended following the complete withdrawal of any Israeli presence in the Gaza Strip. Israel's disengagement raised difficulties that are not only unique to the Gaza Strip; these difficulties emerge in most cases when occupation is replaced by a process of self-determination rather than the return of the former sovereign. The contention presented herein is that Israel continues to have certain post-occupation duties even after the occupation of Gaza. These duties correspond to the occupant's duties to care for order and civil life in the territory during the occupation. These obligations will end once the new regime in the area is able to perform the duties that fell upon the shoulders of the occupant during the occupation, or until the non-performance of the new regime is attributable to its own failures and not to the ending of the occupation. In light of these contentions, Israel is still under certain obligations regarding the Gaza Strip, among them the regular supply of electricity to that area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document