: The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History . Ibn Khaldun, Franz Rosenthal.

1962 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-201
Author(s):  
Alfred McClung Lee
Keyword(s):  
Ibn Khaldun

SENTRALISASI ISLAM MARJINAL

2017 ◽  
pp. 83-112
Author(s):  
Lukmanul Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Primary Sources ◽  
Historical Criticism ◽  
Islamic History ◽  
Ibn Khaldun ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
The Third ◽  
Work First

This paper aims to analyze the thoughts of Hamka in Malay Islamic Nysties Historiography. The method used is historical method, especially historiography approach. Characteristic of Hamka's work; First, writing techniques; Not using footnotes, style of language; Simple, alive, and communicative. The sources used by Hamka can be grouped into three groups; Primary sources, historical books composed by Muslim authors themselves; Second, the second source of material is the Dutch and British writers' writings on Indonesia and the Malay Land; Third, the third source of material materials that allegedly most of the writers of Islamic history in Indonesia did not get it. While from the Method of Historical Criticism, according to Hamka there are two ways to write history among Muslims; First collecting all the facts wherever it comes from, no matter whether the facts make sense or not, what needs to be taken care of is where this history is received. Second, judging the facts and giving their own opinions, after the facts were collected, this is the system used by Ibn Khaldun.

Ibn Khaldun’s Theory of Social Change

1998 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fida Mohammad
Keyword(s):  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
Natural World ◽  
Social Knowledge ◽  
Philosophical Tradition ◽  
Historical Process ◽  
Ibn Khaldun ◽  
Historical Processes ◽  
The Will ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Compare And Contrast

In this article I shall compare and contrast Ibn Khaldun’s ideas aboutsociohistorical change with those of Hegel, Marx, and Durkheim. I willdiscuss and elaborate Ibn Khaldun’s major ideas about historical andsocial change and compare them with three important figures of modemWestern sociology and philosophy.On reading Ibn Khaldun one should remember that he was living in thefourteenth century and did not have the privilege of witnessing the socialdislocation created by the industrial revolution. It is also very difficult tocategorize Ibn Khaldun within a single philosophical tradition. He is arationalist as well as an empiricist, a historicist as well as a believer inhuman agency in the historical process. One can see many “modem”themes in his thinking, although he lived a hundred years beforeMachiavelli.Lauer, who considers Ibn Khaldun the pioneer of modem sociologicalthought, has summarized the main points of his philosophy.’ In his interpretationof Ibn Khaldun, he notes that historical processes follow a regularpattern. However, whereas this pattern shows sufficient regularity, itis not as rigid as it is in the natural world. In this regard the position ofIbn Khaldun is radically different from those philosophies of history thatposit an immutable course of history determined by the will of divineprovidence or other forces. Ibn Khaldun believes that the individual isneither a completely passive recipient nor a full agent of the historicalprocess. Social laws can be discovered through observation and datagathering, and this empirical grounding of social knowledge represents adeparture from traditional rational and metaphysical thinking ...

La Voie du soufisme selon Ibn Khaldûn

1989 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-296
Author(s):  
Éric CHAUMONT
Keyword(s):  
Ibn Khaldun

Pemikiran Ibn Khaldun Mengenai Sifat dan Amalan Negatif yang Boleh Meruntuhkan Kepimpinan Islam

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-166
Author(s):  
Mohamad Kamil Ab. Majid ◽  
Mohd Fauzi Hamat
Keyword(s):  
Ibn Khaldun

The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History Ibn Khaldun Franz Rosenthal

1962 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-201
Author(s):  
Alfred McClung Lee
Keyword(s):  
Ibn Khaldun

The Islamic Philosophy of Labor and Crafts

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-51
Author(s):  
Yasien Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Philosophy ◽  
Ibn Khaldun ◽  
Indirect Influence ◽  
Separate Treatment

The purpose of this essay is to compare the views of the Ikhwan al-Safa’, Isfahani, and Ibn Khaldun on labor, not to trace their influences, which would require separate treatment. However, we could presume the direct or indirect influence of figures such as the Ikhwan al-Safa’. A study into the attitudes toward labor is important for understanding a society’s economic rise or decline.

The Image of the Jews in the Opinion of Ibn Khaldun through the Book of Lessons (Al’ibar)

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (43) ◽  
pp. 238-245
Author(s):  
Weshah , Gassan Mahmud
Keyword(s):  
Ibn Khaldun
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document