scholarly journals Changing inpatient diabetes care in a district general hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-52
Author(s):  
Marie Wallner ◽  
Basharat Andrabi ◽  
David Russell-Jones ◽  
Roselle Herring
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Model Of Care ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Inpatient Diabetes ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Service Redesign ◽  
Evidence Based Care

Introduction: People with diabetes in hospital have longer lengths of stay and are at higher risk of experiencing avoidable harm. This has a significant impact on patient flow and capacity in any hospital Trust.Aims and Methods: A Trust-wide peripatetic inpatient diabetes service redesign was performed to deliver reduced medication errors, improved patient flow, reduced length of stay and reduced inpatient risk. The service redesign was delivered without new recurring expenditure on senior staff. The model of care was multidisciplinary and introduced consensus and evidence-based care with clear governance processes.Results: Following introduction of the new service on 7 December 2017 to 1 June 2018, a reduction in length of stay in both medicine and surgical divisions was seen with 2,168 ‘saved’ inpatient bed days compared with the same time period in the preceding year, which represented a significant cost saving for the Trust and improvement in patient flow. This was associated with a reduction in the number of diabetes-related Datix reports and serious untoward incidents.Conclusions: This is the first major diabetes service redesign in a small district general hospital. The introduction of a dedicated inpatient diabetes service has led to Trust-wide improvements in patient care and patient flow without additional cost to the Trust.

scholarly journals Frequent users of emergency departments and patient flow in Alberta and Ontario, Canada: an administrative data study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anqi Chen ◽  
Scott Fielding ◽  
X. Joan Hu ◽  
Patrick McLane ◽  
Andrew McRae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
Flow Characteristics ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Random Samples ◽  
High System ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background This paper describes and compares patient flow characteristics of adult high system users (HSUs) and control groups in Alberta and Ontario emergency departments (EDs), Canada. Methods Annual cohorts of HSUs were created by identifying patients who made up the top 10% of ED users (by count of ED presentations) in the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System during 2011–2016. Random samples of patients not in the HSU groups were selected as controls. Presentation (e.g., acuity) and ED times (e.g., time to physician initial assessment [PIA], length of stay) data were extracted and described. The length of stay for 2015/2016 data was decomposed into stages and Cox models compared time between stages. Results There were 20,343,230 and 18,222,969 ED presentations made by 7,032,655 and 1,923,462 individuals in the control and HSU groups, respectively. The Ontario groups had higher acuity than the Alberta groups: about 20% in the Ontario groups were from the emergent level whereas Alberta had 11–15%. Time to PIA was similar across provinces and groups (medians of 60 min to 67 min). Lengths of stay were longest for Ontario HSUs (median = 3 h) and shortest for Alberta HSUs (median = 2.2 h). HSUs had shorter times to PIA (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02,1.03), longer times from PIA to decision (HR = 0.84; 95%CI 0.84,0.84), and longer times from decision to leaving the ED (HR = 0.91; 95%CI 0.91,0.91). Conclusions Ontario HSUs had higher acuity and longer ED lengths of stay than the other groups. In both provinces, HSU had shorter times to PIA and longer times after assessment.

scholarly journals The Sydney triage to admission risk tool (START) to improve patient flow in an emergency department: a model of care implementation pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Ebker-White ◽  
Kendall J. Bein ◽  
Saartje Berendsen Russell ◽  
Michael M. Dinh
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Sample ◽  
Patient Admission ◽  
Implementation Study ◽  
Model Of Care ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Pilot Implementation

Abstract Background The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) is a validated clinical analytics tool designed to estimate the probability of in-patient admission based on Emergency Department triage characteristics. Methods This was a single centre pilot implementation study using a matched case control sample of patients assessed at ED triage. Patients in the intervention group were identified at triage by the START tool as likely requiring in-patient admission and briefly assessed by an ED Consultant. Bed management were notified of these patients and their likely admitting team based on senior early assessment. Matched controls were identified on the same day of presentation if they were admitted to the same in-patient teams as patients in the intervention group and same START score category. Outcomes were ED length of stay and proportion of patients correctly classified as an in-patient admission by the START tool. Results One hundred and thirteen patients were assessed using the START-based model of care. When compared with matched control patients, this intervention model of care was associated with a significant reduction in ED length of stay [301 min (IQR 225–397) versus 423 min (IQR 297–587) p < 0.001] and proportion of patients meeting 4 h length of stay thresholds increased from 24 to 45% (p < 0.001). Conclusion In this small pilot implementation study, the START tool, when used in conjunction with senior early assessment was associated with a reduction in ED length of stay. Further controlled studies are now underway to further examine its utility across other ED settings.

scholarly journals The impact of COVID-19 on elective and trauma spine service in a district general hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 281-286
Author(s):  
Wajiha Zahra ◽  
Monil Karia ◽  
Daniel Rolton
Keyword(s):  
General Hospital ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Acute Hospital ◽  
Retrospective Data ◽  
Spine Trauma ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Acute Hospital Admission ◽  
The Impact

Aims The aim of this paper is to describe the impact of COVID-19 on spine surgery services in a district general hospital in England in order to understand the spinal service provisions that may be required during a pandemic. Methods A prospective cohort study was undertaken between 17 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 and compared with retrospective data from same time period in 2019. We compared the number of patients requiring acute hospital admission or orthopaedic referrals and indications of referrals from our admission sheets and obtained operative data from our theatre software. Results Between 17 March to 30 April 2020, there were 48 acute spine referrals as compared to 68 acute referrals during the same time period last year. In the 2019 period, 69% (47/68) of cases referred to the on-call team presented with back pain, radiculopathy or myelopathy compared to 43% (21/48) in the 2020 period. Almost 20% (14/68) of spine referrals consisted of spine trauma as compared to 35% (17/48) this year. There were no confirmed cases of cauda equine last year during this time. Overall, 150 spine cases were carried out during this time period last year, and 261 spine elective cases were cancelled since 17 March 2020. Recommendations We recommend following steps can be helpful to deal with similar situations or new pandemics in future: 24 hours on-call spine service during the pandemic. Clinical criteria in place to prioritize urgent spinal cases. Pre-screening spine patients before elective operating. Start of separate specialist trauma list for patients needing urgent surgeries. Conclusion This paper highlights the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in a district general hospital of England. We demonstrate a decrease in hospital attendances of spine pathologies, despite an increase in emergency spine operations. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:281–286.

Effect on length of stay in a district general hospital after respiratory led pleural interventions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Naik ◽  
Ravi Ragatha ◽  
Ugo Ekeowa ◽  
Peter Russell ◽  
Alex Lupu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
District General Hospital

PTU-303 Impact of implementing a symptom-guided alcohol withdrawal regimen on length of stay in a district general hospital

Gut ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A194.2-A195
Author(s):  
F Rhodes ◽  
J Palit ◽  
K Greenan ◽  
I Nyathi ◽  
E Alstead
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Alcohol Withdrawal ◽  
District General Hospital

scholarly journals The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) to improve patient flow in an Emergency Department: A model of care implementation pilot study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Ebker-White ◽  
Kendall Bein ◽  
Saartje Berendsen Russell ◽  
Michael Dinh
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Sample ◽  
Patient Admission ◽  
Implementation Study ◽  
Model Of Care ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Pilot Implementation

Abstract Background The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) is a validated clinical analytics tool designed to estimate the probability of in-patient admission based on Emergency Department triage characteristics. Methods This was a single centre pilot implementation study using a matched case control sample of patients assessed at ED triage. Patients in the intervention group were identified at triage by the START tool as likely requiring in-patient admission and briefly assessed by an ED Consultant. Bed management were notified of these patients and their likely admitting team based on senior early assessment. Matched controls were identified on the same day of presentation if they were admitted to the same in-patient teams as patients in the intervention group and same START score category. Outcomes were ED length of stay and proportion of patients correctly classified as an in-patient admission by the START tool. Results One hundred and thirteen patients were assessed using the START-based model of care. When compared with matched control patients, this intervention model of care was associated with a significant reduction in ED length of stay [301 minutes (IQR 225-397) versus 423 minutes (IQR 297-587) p<0.001] and proportion of patients meeting four hour length of stay thresholds increased from 24% to 45% (p<0.001). Conclusion In this small pilot implementation study, the START tool, when used in conjunction with senior early assessment was associated with a reduction in ED length of stay. Further controlled studies are now underway to further examine its utility across other ED settings.

scholarly journals The impact of COVID-19 on elective and trauma spine service in a district general hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 281-286
Author(s):  
Wajiha Zahra ◽  
Monil Karia ◽  
Daniel Rolton
Keyword(s):  
General Hospital ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Acute Hospital ◽  
Retrospective Data ◽  
Spine Trauma ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Acute Hospital Admission ◽  
The Impact

Aims The aim of this paper is to describe the impact of COVID-19 on spine surgery services in a district general hospital in England in order to understand the spinal service provisions that may be required during a pandemic. Methods A prospective cohort study was undertaken between 17 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 and compared with retrospective data from same time period in 2019. We compared the number of patients requiring acute hospital admission or orthopaedic referrals and indications of referrals from our admission sheets and obtained operative data from our theatre software. Results Between 17 March to 30 April 2020, there were 48 acute spine referrals as compared to 68 acute referrals during the same time period last year. In the 2019 period, 69% (47/68) of cases referred to the on-call team presented with back pain, radiculopathy or myelopathy compared to 43% (21/48) in the 2020 period. Almost 20% (14/68) of spine referrals consisted of spine trauma as compared to 35% (17/48) this year. There were no confirmed cases of cauda equine last year during this time. Overall, 150 spine cases were carried out during this time period last year, and 261 spine elective cases were cancelled since 17 March 2020. Recommendations We recommend following steps can be helpful to deal with similar situations or new pandemics in future: 24 hours on-call spine service during the pandemic. Clinical criteria in place to prioritize urgent spinal cases. Pre-screening spine patients before elective operating. Start of separate specialist trauma list for patients needing urgent surgeries. Conclusion This paper highlights the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in a district general hospital of England. We demonstrate a decrease in hospital attendances of spine pathologies, despite an increase in emergency spine operations. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:281–286.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document