National Audit of Transition in Endocrinology: joint between Society for Endocrinology and the British Society of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Gleeson ◽  
Avril Mason ◽  
Colin Perry ◽  
Guftar Sheikh ◽  
Lorraine Albon ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
John Schulga ◽  
Heather Mitchell ◽  
S. Faisal Ahmed ◽  
Assunta Albanese ◽  
Justin Warner ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Independent peer review of healthcare services can complement existing internal-, institutional-, and national-level regulatory mechanisms aimed at improving quality of healthcare. However, this has not been reported for paediatric endocrinology services in the UK. We aimed to test feasibility and acceptability through a first cycle of a national peer review of paediatric endocrine services. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Tertiary centres in paediatric endocrinology across the UK were assessed against 54 quality standards, developed by the British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes (BSPED) in five domains of healthcare by a team comprising paediatric endocrinologists and specialist nurses. The evaluation was supported by a self-assessment. A post-peer-review questionnaire was used as feedback. <b><i>Results:</i></b> All 22 centres in the UK underwent independent peer review between 2011 and 2017. Each served a median population of 2.6 million (range 1–8 million) and offered 1,872 (range 779–6,738) outpatient consultations annually. A total of 43 (range 30–49) standards were met in combined evaluation of all centres. Variance of adherence for essential standards ranged from 52 to 97% at individual centres with 90% adherence demonstrated by 32% of centres. Post-review feedback showed 20/22 (95%) validating the utility of the peer review. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The BSPED peer review of all UK centres providing paediatric endocrine services is shown to be feasible and provides a quality benchmark for replication by national services.


2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. 870-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Jane Elder ◽  
Pooja Sachdev ◽  
Neil Peter Wright

BackgroundSupported by meta-analyses, the low-dose Synacthen test (LDST) has gained in popularity, with many believing it to be more sensitive than the supraphysiological standard (250 µg) short ST (SSST), particularly when assessing children prescribed high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (HDICS). However, consensus is lacking about its specific clinical application, what is considered ‘low dose’ and how that dose is made up.MethodsTo ascertain current use of the short Synacthen test (SST), a questionnaire was emailed to members of the British Society of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes in the UK and Ireland (N=257), requesting a response from each department (N=92). A reminder was sent a month later to members of departments which had not responded.ResultsThe authors received 39 replies, giving a response rate of 42%. All departments use the SST: 82% use an LDST, 87% use the SSST and 69% use both. The 1 µg dose was used by 44% of hospitals, with the other 56% using seven different doses based on age, weight and body surface area. There were 14 different methods of preparing the low dose test. Additionally, variations in the timings of cortisol sampling and the diagnostic cut-offs for adrenal insufficiency were found. Increased requests for SSTs in children with asthma prescribed HDICS were noted by 44% of respondents, with 67% reporting the detection of adrenal suppression in this group.ConclusionStandardisation of the SST is required to address the considerable variation in the methodology and application of this test in the UK and Ireland.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-33
Author(s):  
Ketan Dhatariya ◽  
Peter Winocour ◽  
Andrew Raffles

Background: The standard of care of 16–18-year-olds presenting with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is uncertain. It is unknown who looks after them or what guidelines are used to manage their DKA.Methods: We carried out a survey using a standardised questionnaire sent to diabetes and emergency care teams across the UK using mailing lists from the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists, The Diabetes Specialist Nurse Group (UK) and the British Society of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes.Results: There was a relatively poor response rate; only 32 completed questionnaires were received between May and November 2018. The data suggest that the care was highly variable across the UK. There were no consistencies on how ‘16–18 years old’ was defined; who looked after them either during the acute phase once they had been triaged through the emergency department or during the later stages of their admission; or what guideline was used to treat their DKA. Several other aspects of care were also varied.Conclusions: The care of 16–18-year-olds presenting with DKA needs to be standardised across the UK. Furthermore, because a large number are looked after by adult non- specialist general medical teams, there is a clear need to ensure a consistent straightforward joint guideline that can be readily applied in all acute clinical settings regardless of whether care takes place in a paediatric or an adult clinical setting.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madeleine Macdonald ◽  
John H. F. Smith ◽  
John A. Tidy ◽  
Julia E. Palmer

2019 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1276-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon G. Anderson ◽  
Ahmad Shoaib ◽  
Phyo Kyaw Myint ◽  
John G. Cleland ◽  
Suzanna M. Hardman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document